期刊文献+

Factors influencing outcomes of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in elderly patients 被引量:5

Factors influencing outcomes of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in elderly patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) is a mechanical cardiac-assist device that is used for cardiac support. There are no published reports about the use of IABP in elderly Chinese patients, especially for those over 80 years old. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical outcomes, influencing factors, and complications in patients 〉80 years old and requiring IABP. Methods We performed a retrospective study of 134 consecutive patients who received IABP therapy. Based on age, we defined two groups; those 〉80 years old and those 〈80 years old. Results The overall mortality was 41.8%. Patients -〉80 years old had higher mortality rates than those 〈80 years old (47.9% vs. 30.2%). Patients 〉80 years old had fewer successful revascularizations (45.8%) and more pulmonary infections (47.9%) than patients 〈80 years old (60.3% and 30.2%, respectively); these differences were statistically significant. The most common non-cardiac complication was pulmonary infection. Cardiogenic shock and pulmonary infection were risk factors for all-cause, in-hospital mortality, whereas revascularization success was a negative risk factor for the -〉80 years old patients. Conclusions IABP may be successfully and safely employed in patients 〉80 years old, having severe heart disease, with few complications. Patients 〉80 years old who need IABP therapy are less likely to have a successful revascularization and are more likely to develop pulmonary infections than patients 〈80 years old. Background Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) is a mechanical cardiac-assist device that is used for cardiac support. There are no published reports about the use of IABP in elderly Chinese patients, especially for those over 80 years old. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical outcomes, influencing factors, and complications in patients 〉80 years old and requiring IABP. Methods We performed a retrospective study of 134 consecutive patients who received IABP therapy. Based on age, we defined two groups; those 〉80 years old and those 〈80 years old. Results The overall mortality was 41.8%. Patients -〉80 years old had higher mortality rates than those 〈80 years old (47.9% vs. 30.2%). Patients 〉80 years old had fewer successful revascularizations (45.8%) and more pulmonary infections (47.9%) than patients 〈80 years old (60.3% and 30.2%, respectively); these differences were statistically significant. The most common non-cardiac complication was pulmonary infection. Cardiogenic shock and pulmonary infection were risk factors for all-cause, in-hospital mortality, whereas revascularization success was a negative risk factor for the -〉80 years old patients. Conclusions IABP may be successfully and safely employed in patients 〉80 years old, having severe heart disease, with few complications. Patients 〉80 years old who need IABP therapy are less likely to have a successful revascularization and are more likely to develop pulmonary infections than patients 〈80 years old.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第14期2632-2635,共4页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation ELDERLY OUTCOME COMPLICATION intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation elderly outcome complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Kantrowitz A, Tjonneland S, Freed PS, Phillips S J, Butner AN, Sherman JL. Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. JAMA 1968; 203: 113-118.
  • 2Etienne PY, Papadatos S, Glineur D, Mairy Y, E1 Khoury E, Noirhomme P, et al. Reduced mortality in high-risk coronary patients operated off pump with preoperative intraaortic balloon counterpulsation. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 498-502.
  • 3Sauren LD, Accord RE, Hamzeh K, de Jong M, van der Nagel T, van der Veen FH, et al. Combined impella and intra-aortic balloon pump support to improve both ventficular unloading and coronary blood flow for myocardial recovery: an experimental study. Artif Organs 2007; 31: 839-842.
  • 4Vijayalakshmi K, Kunadian B, Whittaker VJ, Wright RA, Hall JA, Sutton A, et al. Intra-aortic counterpulsation does not improve coronary flow early after PCI in a high-risk group of patients: observations from a randomized trial to explore its mode of action. J Invasive Cardiol 2007; 19: 339-346.
  • 5Chang SN, Hwang JJ, Chen YS, Lin JW, Chiang FF. Clinical experience with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation over 10 years: a retrospective cohort study of 459 patients. Resuscitation 2008; 77:316-324.
  • 6Iakobishvili Z, Behar S, Boyko V, Battler A, Hasdai D. Does current treatment of cardiogenic shock complicating the acute coronary syndromes comply with guidelines? Am Heart J 2005; 149: 98-103.
  • 7Szatmay LJ, Marco J. Haemodynamic and antiischaemic protective effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in high risk coronary heart patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cor Vasa 1987; 29: 183-191.
  • 8Blackman DJ, Ferguson JD, Sprigings DC, Banning AE Revascularization for acute coronary syndromes in older people. Age Ageing 2003; 32: 129-135.
  • 9Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Thompson CA, Gurwitz JH. Recent magnitude of and temporal trends (1994-1997) in the incidence and hospital death rates of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: the second national registry of myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2001; 141: 65-72.
  • 10Smith SC, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ,King SB, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006; 113: e166-e286.

共引文献1

同被引文献23

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部