摘要
目的探讨并对比左室急性心肌梗死后急诊介入治疗与择期介入治疗的疗效。方法将在我科治疗的120名左室急性心肌梗死患者分为2组,急诊组60例进行急诊PCI,择期组60例择期PCI手术治疗。观察手术效果和术后并发症等临床指标。结果急诊组痊愈率88.3%,优于常规组65.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急诊介入治疗在左室急性心肌梗死治疗中比择期介入治疗更有效。
Objective To investigate and compare the efficacy of left ventricular acute myocardial infarction after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and elective interventional treatment. Methods In our department treated 120 lett ventricular acute myocardial infarction were divided into two groups, emergency group of 60 patients, emergency PCI, elective group of 60 patients undergoing elective PCI surgical treatment. Observe the effect of surgery and post-operative complications, such as clinical indicators. Results Emergency group cure rate of 88.3%, 65.0% better than the conventional group, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The emergency intervention more effectively than elective interventional treatment of left ventricular acute myocardial infarction.
出处
《中国医药指南》
2013年第19期418-419,共2页
Guide of China Medicine
关键词
心肌梗死
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
择期
Myocardial infarction
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Elective
