期刊文献+

SIL方法比较及LOPA在海洋平台的应用 被引量:2

Comparison of the Evaluation Methods of SIL and LOPA Application in the Offshore Platform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文首先介绍了安全仪表系统在现代过程工业中的作用和地位,然后阐述了安全完整性等级的划分及对五种SIL等级的评估方法进行了综合比较,最后重点分析了LOPA方法的执行步骤及在海洋平台的应用案例,本研究成果取得了较好的应用,具有广阔的推广前景。 The paper first introduces the role and status of safety instrumented system (SIS) in modem industry pro- cess,and then elaborates classification of safety integrity level and comparison of five SIL evaluation methods,finally, focusing on analysis of LOPA method implementation steps and application in offshore platform,the research has a good application and with abroad prospects.
作者 李俊 刘鸿雁
出处 《自动化与仪表》 北大核心 2013年第7期5-7,共3页 Automation & Instrumentation
关键词 安全仪表系统 安全仪表功能 安全仪表等级 保护层分析 独立保护层 safety instrumented system (SIS) safety instrument functional (SIF) safety integrity level (SIL) layer ofprotection analysis(LOPA) independent protection layer(IPL)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1郭海涛,阳宪惠.安全系统的安全完整性水平及其选择[J].化工自动化及仪表,2006,33(2):71-75. 被引量:35
  • 2IEC 61508: Functional safety of electrical/ electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems.
  • 3ANSI/ISA 84.00.01-2004 (IEC61511): Function safety: Safety Instrumented Systems for the process sector.
  • 4中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会.SH/T3018-2003石油化工安全仪表系统设计规范[S].保定:中国石化集团公司工程建设标准发行站,2003.
  • 5IEC 61508,Functional Safety of Electrical/ Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related System [S]. 1998.
  • 6IEC 61511 , Functional Safety: Safety Instrumented System for the Process Industry Sector [S].2003.
  • 7IEC 61508,Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems,International Electrotechnical Commission[S].
  • 8IEC 61511,Functional Safety-Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Sector,International Electrotechnical Commission[S].
  • 9Marszal E.Tolerable Risk Guidelines[J].ISA Transactions,2001,40(4):391-399.
  • 10STAVRIANIDIS P,KBHIMAVARAPU K.Safety Instrumented Functions and Safety Integrity Levels (SIL)[J].ISA Transactions,1998,37 (4):337-351.

共引文献32

同被引文献21

  • 1卢卫,王延平.保护层分析方法[J].安全、健康和环境,2006,6(4):32-34. 被引量:23
  • 2Center for Chemical Process Safety. Guidelines for safe automation of chemical process[M]. New York : American Institu-te of Chemical Engineers, 1993 : 44 -70.
  • 3Baybutt P. Layers of protection analysis for human factors[J〕. Process Safety Progress, 2002,21 (2) : 119 - 129.
  • 4Markowskiex A S. LOPA for explosion risks assessment [j]. Journal of Loss Prevention in Process Industries, 2007 ,142(3) :669 -676.
  • 5Evenson G, Befus S, Dolfi M, et al. LOPA as practiced at a global manufacturing API facility [J]. Process SafetyProgress , 2009, 28(4) : 312-316.
  • 6Yun G W, Rogers W J, Mannan W S. Risk assessment of LNG importation terminals using the Bayesian-LOPA methodol-ogy[ J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in Process Industries, 2009 ,22( 1) : 91 -96.
  • 7MKhalil, MAAbdou, MSMansour, et al. A cascaded fuzzy-LOPA risk assessment model applied in natural gas industry [J].Journal of Loss Prevention in Process Industries, 2012,25(6) : 877 - 882.
  • 8Clementina Ramirez-Marengo, Julio de Lira-Flores, AntiocoL6pez-Molina, et al. Formulation to optimize the risk reductionprocess based on LOPA[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in Process Industries, 2013 , 26(3) : 489 -494.
  • 9Murphy J F, Chastain W, Bridges W B. Initiating events and independent protection layers[J]. Process Safety Progress,2009, 28(4〕: 374 -378.
  • 10Study K A, Champion J W. LOPA misapplied: Common errors can lead to incorrect conclusions [J]. Process Safety Pro-gress, 2009, 28(4) : 300 -307.

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部