期刊文献+

二维斑点追踪纵向应变评价不同部位右心室起搏患者心脏收缩同步性

Evaluation of two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging on left ventricular systolic desynchronization in patients with right ventricular pacing at different sites
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的利用二维斑点追踪超声纵向应变比较不同部位右心室起搏对左心室收缩不同步性的影响。方法有双腔起搏器植入指征的无器质性心脏病变患者共60例,按1:1随机数表法随机分为两组,根据分组结果分别将右心室电极植入右心室流出道间隔部(right ventricular outflow tract septum,RVOTs)及右心室心尖(right ventricular apex,RVA)。术后起搏器程控并保证心室完全起搏后,进行二维斑点超声成像分析,记录左心室收缩时纵向应变达峰时间的最大差(LS-TD)。结果 RVA组左心室收缩时纵向应变最大差大于RVOT组,差异有统计学意义[(161.6±43.9)ms vs.(74.3±13.7)ms,P<0.001]。结论二维斑点追踪超声纵向应变结果显示RVOT起搏时的左心室收缩同步性优于RVA起搏。 Objectives Using two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (STI) technology to compare the difference of left ventricular systolic desynchronization in patients with right ventricular pacing at different sites. Methods Totally 60 consecutive patients with indication of permanent pacemaker implantation were randomly (1:1 random number table) assigned into two groups. Right ventricular lead was placed in right ventricular outflow tract septum (RVOTs) or right ventrieular apex (RVA) accordingly. STI was analyzed under the condition of 100% ventricular pacing and time to peak longitude strain (LS) was recorded after implantation. Results Time difference (TD) of time to peak strain on longitude strain in RVA group was significantly larger than that in RVOT group [(161.6±43.9) ms vs. (74.3±13.7) ms, P〈 0.001 ]. Conclusions STI indicates that left ventricular synchronization of RVOT pacing is superior to RVA pacing.
出处 《岭南心血管病杂志》 2013年第4期435-437,520,共4页 South China Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases
关键词 生理性起搏 斑点追踪成像超声 纵向应变 心脏起搏 physical pacing speckle tracking imaging longitude strain cardiac pacing
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1INOUE K, OKAYAMA H, NISHIMURA K, et al. Right ventricular pacing from the septum avoids the acute exacerbation in left ventricular dyssynchrony and torsional behavior seen with pacing from the apex[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2010, 23 (2) : 195-200.
  • 2VLAY S C. Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: practical and beneficial: A 9-year experience of 460 consecutive implants[J]. PACE, 2006, 29(10) : 1055-1062.
  • 3NG A C, ALLMAN C, VIDAIC J, et al. long-term impact of fight ventricular septal versus apical pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in patients with second- or third-degree heart block[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2009, 103(8) : 1096-1101.
  • 4TANABE M, LAMIA B, TANAKA H, et al. Echocardiographic speckle tracking radial strain imaging to ventricular dyssynchrony in a pacing model of resynchronization therapy[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiography, 2008, 21(12) : 1382-1388.
  • 5BARIN E S, JONES S M, WARD D E, et al. The fightventricular outflow tract as an alternative permanent pacing site : long-term follow-up [ J ]. Pacing Clin Eleetrophysiol, 1991,14(1): 3-6.
  • 6MATSUOKA K, NISHINO M, KATO H, et al. Right ventricular apical pacing impairs left ventricular twist as well as synchrony: acute effects of right ventricular apical pacing[ J ]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2009, 22(8): 914-919.
  • 7FORNWALT B K, CUMMINGS R M, ARITA T, et al. Acute pacing-induced dyssynchronous activation of the left ventricle creates systolic dyssynchrony with preserved diastolic synchrony [J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2008, 19 (5): 483 -488.
  • 8BLESSBERGER H, BINDER T. NON-invasive imaging: Two dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: basic principles [J]. Heart, 2010, 96(9): 716-722.
  • 9CHO G Y, KIM M J, PARK J H, et al. Comparison of ventricalar dyssynchrony according to the position of right ventrieular pacing electrode : a multi-center prospective echocardiographic study [J]. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound, 2011, 19( 1 ) : 15-20.
  • 10YOSHIKAWA H, SUZUKI M, TEZUKA N, et al. Differences in left ventricular dyssynchrony between high septal pacing and apical pacing in patients with normal left ventricular systolic function[J]. J Cardiol, 2010, 56( 1): 44-50.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部