期刊文献+

中国农产品应对碳关税策略的理论分析 被引量:2

Theoretical Analyses of China’s Response Strategies for Carbon Tariffs on Agri-products
下载PDF
导出
摘要 碳关税是在全球气候变暖和人类环境压力与日俱增的背景下由欧盟等发达国家提出的,是发达国家以环境保护之名的一种新型绿色贸易壁垒。中国是一个农产品生产和出口大国,碳关税的实施必将影响中国的农产品出口。本文首先运用进化博弈理论分析了发展中国家和发达国家对征收碳关税问题上可能采取的最终策略;然后采用古诺模型探讨了在发达国家征收碳关税的背景下,中国应采取哪些策略可以减少对农产品出口的影响;最后,基于情景分析和蒙特卡洛模拟的结果,提出了全球碳关税背景下中国应该采取的最优策略。研究结果显示:①发达国家很可能会强硬征收碳关税,而发展中国家很有可能会妥协。②中国可采取多种措施减轻发达国家征收碳关税对农产品出口的影响。这些措施包括向发达国家征收报复性碳关税、对内征收碳税以及开发低碳农业技术等。③在发达国家征收碳关税的情景下,中国的最优策略是对内征收碳税。基于本文的研究结论,提出了相应的政策建议。 Carbon tariff is proposed by the European Union and other developed countries in the context of global warming and increasing human environmental pressure, which is a new green trade barrier in the name of environmental protection. China is a big country of agricultural production and export. Therefore, the implementation of carbon tariffs is bound to affect China' s agricultural exports. In this paper, we firstly utilize the evolutionary game theory to analyze the final strategy that may be taken by the developing countries and developed countries for carbon tariffs. Then, by using the Coumot model, we discuss what strategies China should adopt on the background of imposing carbon tariffs by developed countries. Finally, we put forward the optimal strategy that China should take in the context of global carbon tariffs based on the results of the scenario analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. The research results indicate that: (~) developed countries are likely to impose carbon tariffs toughly, while developing countries are likely to compromise; (~) China can take many measures to mitigate the impact of the developed countries' imposing carbon tariffs on agricultural exports, including imposing retaliatory carbon tariffs to the developed countries, levying domestic carbon taxes and developing low carbon agricultural technology ; and (~)in the scenario of the developed countries ' imposing carbon tariffs, China' s optimal strategy is to levy domestic carbon taxes. We also propose corresponding policy recommendations based on the conclusions of this research.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期33-41,共9页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"碳关税和碳标签对农产品贸易和减排的影响机制研究"(编号:71173201)
关键词 碳关税 农产品出口 博弈分析 古诺模型 蒙特卡罗模拟 carbon tariffs agricultural exports game analysis Cournot model Monte Carlo simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献108

  • 1周骏宇.世贸组织谈判与利益分配——一种非对称进化博弈论分析[J].国际贸易问题,2005(6):65-69. 被引量:8
  • 2Charnovitz, S. Beyond Kyotcs (2003) “Trade and Climate: Potential Conflicts and Synergies,” PEW Centre on Global Climate Change.
  • 3Cosbey, A., (1999) "The Kyoto Protocol and the WTO, Note for IISD and RIIA Seminar during the Third WTO Ministerial in Seattle," Available at: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/kyoto.pdf.
  • 4Muller, F. and A. Hoemer, (1997) "Using A Border Adjustment To Take The Lead On Climate Change Without Encouraging Runaway Shops," Available at: http://www.ies.unsw.edu.au/ aboutJst aff/fran ksFiles/Policy N otes/BorderAdj ust ment, pdf#search =%22border%20tax%20adjustment%20cl.
  • 5Wysham, D, (2003) "Climate Change Policy Coherence in Global Trade and Financial Flows," Transnational Institute, Available at: http://www.tni.org/reports/seen/climatepolicy.pdf#search=%22border%20tax%20adjustment%20cl.
  • 6Lorraine Mallinder, (2004) "Carbon border taxes could be brought out of the freezer," European Voice, Vol. 10 No. 43: 9.
  • 7EU moots border tax to offset costs of climate action, available at: http://euractiv.cabestan.com/Go/index.cfm?WL=46300&WS=64436_271979&WA=4380, 10 October, 2006.
  • 8Mandelson rejects CO2 border tax, 18 December 2006, http://www.euractiv.com/ensustainabilitymandelson-rejects-co2 -border-taxarticle- 160543.
  • 9Pearce, D.W., (1991) "The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming," Economic Journal 101 (407) : 938- 48.
  • 10Stigler,Gorge.J,潘振民译.《产业组织与政府管制》,上海三联出版社,1989年出版.

共引文献319

同被引文献78

引证文献2

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部