期刊文献+

心脏死亡器官捐献供者应用血管活性药物对供肝质量及肝移植受者的影响 被引量:7

The impact of vasoactive drugs on liver transplant recipients and allografts in donors after cardiac death
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨心脏死亡器官捐献(DCD)供者维护中的血管活性药物应用对肝移植受者及移植物的影响。方法回顾分析2011年7月至2012年7月问19例DCD供肝移植的临床资料,依据DCD供者在器官切取前是否使用血管活性药物维持血压,将19例DCD供肝移植的供、受者分为血管活性药物组(用药组)和未使用血管活性药物组(未用药组)。观察和比较两组供、受者间的临床特征、术后并发症、受者和移植物存活时间等。结果术后两组受者间肝功能指标均无显著差异。两组受者均未出现与供者相关的胆道并发症、原发性移植物功能不全、门静脉狭窄、肝动脉血栓形成等。用药组受者及移植物的存活时间为(4.2±4.2)个月,未用药组为(6.2±4.2)个月,两组受者及移植物的存活时间基本相同(P〉0.05)。结论在DCD供者的维护中,血管活性药物的应用对肝移植后移植肝功能、胆道并发症、原发性移植物功能不全、门静脉狭窄、肝动脉血栓形成及受者和移植物的存活时间并无明显影响。 Objective To define the impact of vosoactive drugs on liver transplant recipients and allografts in donors after cardiac death (DCD). Method From July 2011 through July 2012,19 liver transplantations were performed from DCD. Donor and recipient characteristics, posttransplant complications, and patient and allograft survival time in both groups with or without use of vasoactive drugs were compared. Results No differences in liver functions (ALT,AST,GGT,TB,INR) ,primary graft disfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein stenosis, or biliary complications were noted between two groups. The survival time in vasoactive drugs group was 4. 2±4. 2 months and that in non-vasoactive drugs group was 6. 2±4. 2 months, respectively ( P〉0. 05). Conclusion The application of vasoactive drugs has no influence on liver function, primary graft disfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein stenosis, biliary complications and survival time in DCD in comparison with DCD not given vasoactive drugs.
出处 《中华器官移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期411-414,共4页 Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
基金 广东省科技计划(20108031600205 2012IR)31800296) 广东省医学科研基金(A12010158)
关键词 肝移植 心脏死亡器官捐献 血管活性药物 Liver transplantation Donation after cardiac death Vasoactive agonists
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Fujita S, Mizuno S, Fujikawa T, et al. Liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death a single center experience. Transplantation, 2007,84 ( 1 ) 46-49.
  • 2] Institute of Medicine. Organ donation:opportunities for action. Washington,DC: National Academy Press,2006.
  • 3Abt P,Crawford M, De sai N, et al. Liver transplantation from controlled nonheart-beating donors an increased incidence ofbiliary complications. Transplantation, 2003, 75 (10): 1659- 1663.
  • 4Nathan HM, Jarrell BE, Broznik B, et al. Estimation and characterization of the potential renal organ donor pool in Pennsylvania: report of the Pennsylvania Statewide Donor Study. Transplantation, 1991,51(1): 142-149.
  • 5Casavilla A,Ramirez C, Shapiro R, et al. Experience with liver and kidney allografts from nonheart-beating donors. Transplantation, 1995,59 (2) : 197-203.
  • 6D'Alessandro AM, Hoffmann RM, Kneehtle SJ, et al. Liver transplantation from controlled non-heart-beating donors. Surgery, 2000,128 (4) : 579.
  • 7DAlessandro AM, Fernandez LA, Chin LT, et al. Donation after Cardiac Death:The University of Wisconsin Experience. Ann Transplant,2004,9(1) :68-71.
  • 8Grewal HP, Willingham DL, Nguyen J, et al. Liver transplantation using controlled donation after cardiac death donors: an analysis of a large single-center experience. Liver Transpl,2009,15(9) : 1028-1035.
  • 9Abt PL, Desai NM, Crawford MD, et al. Survival following liver transplantation from nonheart-beating donors. Ann Surg, 2004,239(1) : 87-92.
  • 10Reich DJ, Hong JC. Current status of donation after cardiac death liver transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2010, 15(3) : 16-321.

同被引文献117

引证文献7

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部