期刊文献+

3M和5M液晶显示器对不同分辨率乳腺体模图影像显示质量的研究 被引量:5

Imaging quality comparison of 3- and 5-megapixel liquid crystal display monitors on high-and low-resolution breast phantom images
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不同分辨率乳腺机获得的专用模体测试结果,评估3M与5M医用专业显示器对乳腺影像显示质量的影响。方法使用70μm和100μm分辨率乳腺机分别拍摄对比度细节乳腺摄影(CDMAM)。由4名放射诊断医师和2名技师在标准和放大显示模式下,评估2种显示器所能显示的最小圆盘直径(Di)与厚度(Ci,th),并计算出影像质量因子反数值(IQFinv)。2种显示器及2种显示模式的比较均采用配对t检验。结果在使用100μm分辨率乳腺影像数据时,无论是标准显示模式还是放大显示模式,2种显示器的影像细节显示能力相仿(P>0.05);使用70μm分辨率乳腺影像数据时,在标准显示模式下,5M显示器可识别最小直径为(0.130±0.000)mm,小于3M显示器的(0.155±0.012)mm(P=0.004)。5M显示器的IQFinv值显著高于3M显示器(P=0.036)。在放大显示模式下,3M与5M显示器的可识别最小直径相同[(0.125±0.012)mm],5M显示器的IQFinv值高于3M显示器,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。无论哪种分辨率图像与显示器组合,在放大模式下阅片的影像质量均优于标准模式(P=0.010)。结论 70μm分辨率数据配备5M显示器可获得高质量图像,利用阅读时的放大模式在一定程度上可改善3M显示器对各种细节的显示。 Objective To Compare the imaging quality of 3- and 5-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on high- and low-resolution breast phantom images. Methods The contrast detail mammography (CDMAM) phantom was exposed at 70 IX m and 100 IX m resolution digital mammography respectively. Pour radiologists and two technicians evaluated the X-ray phantom in standard and magnification modes by recording the minimum diameter (mm) of every row (thickness, μ m), and calculating imaging quality figure inversion (IQPinv). Results The display capability of breast imaging at 100 μm resolution was similar in 3M and 5M LCD monitors, whether in standard or magnification mode (P〉0.05). On breast imaging at 70 μ m resolution, the minimum diameter observed by 5M monitor was (0.130 ± 0.000) mm, less than that of (0.155 ± 0.012) mm by 3M monitor (P=0.004). 5M monitor's IQPinv value was significantly higher than 3M monitor's (P=0.036) in standard mode. In magnification mode, the minimum diameter observed by both 5M and 3M monitors were equal [(0.125 ± 0.012) ram]. 5M monitor's IQPinv value was higher than 3M monitor's, but there was no significant difference (P〉0.05). Whatever the image resolution, the imaging quality in magnification mode was superior to standard mode (P=0.010). Conclusion The breast imaging at 70 μm resolution combined with 5M monitor can obtain high-quality images. The magnification mode can improve the display capabilities.
出处 《肿瘤影像学》 2013年第2期166-169,176,共5页 Oncoradiology
关键词 显示器 分辨率 乳腺 模型 影像质量 数字化X线摄影 Monitor Resolution Breast Phantom Imaging quality Digital radiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1曹厚德.“软阅读”及专业显示器[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2006,12(5):359-363. 被引量:9
  • 2BACHER K,SMEETS P,DE HAUWERE A. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems:influence of display resolution,magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection[J].European Journal of Radiology,2006,(03):471-479.doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.016.
  • 3CHIDA K,ZUGUCHI M,SAI M. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography:a contrast detail phantom study[J].Clinical Imaging,2006,(04):246-250.
  • 4SCHARITZER M,PROKOP M,WEBER M. Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs:comparison between liquid crystal display and highresolution cathode-ray tube monitors[J].Radiology,2005,(02):611-616.
  • 5BALASSY C,PROKOP M,WEBER M. Flatpanel display (LCD) versus high-resolution grayscale display (CRT) for chest radiography:an observer preference study[J].American Journal of Roentgenology,2005,(03):752-756.
  • 6UEMATSU T,KASAMI M,UCHIDA Y. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications:diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting[J].Acta Radiologica,2007,(07):714-720.
  • 7KAMITANI T,YABUUCHI H,SOEDA H. Detection of masses and microcalcications of breast screen on digital mammograms:comparison among hard copy lm,3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors:an observer performance study[J].European Journal of Radiology,2007,(05):1365-1371.
  • 8胡晓欣,顾雅佳,吴斌,李瑞敏,彭卫军,毛健,郑晓静.3M和5M显示器对不同分辨率乳腺影像图中微钙化识读的影响[J].生物医学工程学杂志,2013,30(2):245-248. 被引量:5
  • 9胡晓欣,顾雅佳,吴斌,李瑞敏,彭卫军,毛健,郑晓静.3M和5M显示器对不同分辨率乳腺影像图中微钙化诊断的影响[J].中国癌症杂志,2013,23(1):47-50. 被引量:1

二级参考文献15

  • 1Nawfel RD,Chan KH,Wagenaar DJ,et al.Evaluation of video grayscale display.Medical Physics,1992,19:561~567
  • 2NEMA.Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 14:Grayscale Standard Display Function.1999
  • 3Barten PGJ.Physical model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye.Proc,SPIE,1992,1666:57~72
  • 4Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems.Executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
  • 5MORGAN M P, COOKE M M, MCCARTHY G M. Micro-calcifications associated with breast cancer: an epiphenomenonor biologically signi. cant feature of selected tumours. [J]. JMammary Gland Biol Neoplasia, 2005, 10(2) : 181-187.
  • 6UEMATSU T,KASAMI M, UCHIDA Y. Soft-copy readingin digital mammography of microcalcifications : diagnostic per-formance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting[J].Acta Radiol, 2007, 48(7): 714-720.
  • 7KAMITANI T, YABUUCHI H, SOEDA H,et al. Detectionof masses and microcalcifications of breast screen on digitalmammograms: comparison among hard copy film. 3-megapixelliquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCDmonitors: an observer performance study [J]. Eur Radiol,2007, 17(5): 1365 - 1371.
  • 8American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaging repor-ting and data system (BI-RADS) [M]. 4th ed. Reston: AmCollege Radial, 2003.
  • 9DORFMAN D D, BERBAUM K S, METZ C E. Receiver op-erating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to thepopulation of readers and patients with the jackknife method[J], Invest Radiol, 1992, 27(9): 723-731.
  • 10SVANHOLM H, STARKLINT H, GUNDERSEN H J, et al.Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special ref-erence to the kappa statistic[J]. APMIS, 1989, 97(8) : 689-698.

共引文献12

同被引文献44

  • 1唐峰,谢晋东,赵雷.医学成像系统显示器性能评价方法[J].中国医学装备,2006,3(1):27-30. 被引量:9
  • 2杨燕敏,曹厚德.医疗环境下“软阅读”的质量管理研究[J].医学影像学杂志,2007,17(7):750-753. 被引量:4
  • 3[2]王汝涌.管理信息系统[M].北京:中国财经出版社,2001.
  • 4杨正汉,冯逢,王霄英.磁共振成像技术指南[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2010:273.
  • 5黄锋,刘建滨,熊建国,张伟.数字影像在非专业与医用专业显示器中显示效果的比较[J].放射学实践,2007,22(12):1338-1339. 被引量:1
  • 6Maskarinec G, Morimoto Y, Laguana MB, et al. Bioimpedence to assess breast density as a risk factor for breast cancer in adult women and adolescent girls[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2016, 17(1): 65-71.
  • 7Chen X, Moschidis E, Taylor C, et al. Breast cancer risk analysis based on a novel segmentation framework for digital mammograms[J]. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, 2014, 17(Pt 1): 536-543.
  • 8Hellquist BN, Czene K, Hjalm A, et al. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years with a high or low risk of breast cancer: socioeconomic status, parity, and age at birth of first child[J]. Cancer, 2015, 121(2): 251-258. DOI:10.1002/ encr.29011.
  • 9Marshall NW, van Ongeval C, Bosmans H. Performance evaluation of a retrofit digital detector-based mammography system[J]. Phys Med, 2016, 32(2): 312-322. DOI:10.1016/j. ejmp.2016.01.002.
  • 10Monnin P, Bosmans H, Verdun FR, et al. A comprehensive model for quantum noise characterization in digital mammography[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2016, 61(5): 2083-2108. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/2083.

引证文献5

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部