期刊文献+

Impact of comorbidity in elderly prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy

Impact of comorbidity in elderly prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective: To analyze the correlations among comorbidity and overall survival (OS), biochemical progression-free survival (b-PFS) and toxicity in elderly patients with localized prostate cancer treated with 125I brachytherapy. Methods: Elderly men, aged ≥65 years, with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer, were treated with permanent 125I brachytherapy as monotherapy. Comorbidity data were obtained from medical reports using age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (a-CCI). The patients were categorized into two age groups (〈75 and 〉75 years old), and two comorbidity score groups (a-CCI ≤3 and 〉3). Toxicity was scored with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. Results: From June 2003 to October 2009, a total of 92 elderly patients underwent prostate brachytherapy, including 57 men (62%) with low-risk prostate cancer, and 35 men (38%) with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. The median age of patients was 75 years (range, 65-87 years). Forty-seven patients (51%) bad a-CCI _〈3 and 45 patients (49%) a-CCI 〉3. With a median follow-up period of 56 months (range, 24-103 months), the 5-year actuarial OS and b-PFS were 91.3% and 92.4% respectively, without statistical significance between two Charlson score groups. Toxicity was mild. None of the patients experienced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and only 4 patiens (4%) experienced late genitourinary (GU) grade-3 (G3) toxicity. No correlation between acute GU and GI toxicity and eomorbidity was showed (P=0.50 and P=0.70, respectively). Conclusions: Our data suggest that elderly men with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer and comorbidity can be considered for a radical treatment as 12Sl low-dose rate brachytherapy. Objective: To analyze the correlations among comorbidity and overall survival (OS), biochemical progression-free survival (b-PFS) and toxicity in elderly patients with localized prostate cancer treated with 125I brachytherapy. Methods: Elderly men, aged ≥65 years, with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer, were treated with permanent 125I brachytherapy as monotherapy. Comorbidity data were obtained from medical reports using age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (a-CCI). The patients were categorized into two age groups (〈75 and 〉75 years old), and two comorbidity score groups (a-CCI ≤3 and 〉3). Toxicity was scored with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. Results: From June 2003 to October 2009, a total of 92 elderly patients underwent prostate brachytherapy, including 57 men (62%) with low-risk prostate cancer, and 35 men (38%) with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. The median age of patients was 75 years (range, 65-87 years). Forty-seven patients (51%) bad a-CCI _〈3 and 45 patients (49%) a-CCI 〉3. With a median follow-up period of 56 months (range, 24-103 months), the 5-year actuarial OS and b-PFS were 91.3% and 92.4% respectively, without statistical significance between two Charlson score groups. Toxicity was mild. None of the patients experienced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and only 4 patiens (4%) experienced late genitourinary (GU) grade-3 (G3) toxicity. No correlation between acute GU and GI toxicity and eomorbidity was showed (P=0.50 and P=0.70, respectively). Conclusions: Our data suggest that elderly men with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer and comorbidity can be considered for a radical treatment as 12Sl low-dose rate brachytherapy.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Cancer Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第3期274-280,共7页 中国癌症研究(英文版)
关键词 Prostate cancer braehytherapy ELDERLY COMORBIDITY TOXICITY overall survival biochemical control Prostate cancer braehytherapy elderly comorbidity toxicity overall survival biochemical control
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987,40:373-83.
  • 2Yan Y, Carvalhal GF, Catalona W-J, et al. Primary treatment choices for men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma detected by screening. Cancer 2000,88:1122-30.
  • 3Alibhai SM, Krahn MD, Cohen MM, et al. Is there age bias in the treatment of localized prostate carcinoma? Cancer 2004, 100:72-81.
  • 4Litwin MS, Greenfield S, Elkin EP, et al. Assessment of prognosis with the total illness burden index for prostate cancer: aiding clinicians in treatment choice. Cancer 2007,109:1777-83.
  • 5Mbertsen PC, Fryback DG, Storer BE, et al. The impact of co-morbidity on life expectancy among men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1996, 156:127-32.
  • 6Newschaffer CJ, Otani K, McDonald MK, et al. Causes of death in elderly prostate cancer patients and in a comparison nonprostate cancer cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000,92:613-21.
  • 7Pickles T, Keyes M, Morris WJ. Brachytherapy or conformal external radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a single-institution matched-pair analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010,76:43-9.
  • 8Kupelian PA, Potters L, Khuntia D, et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy <72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy > or =72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004,58:25-33.
  • 9Colberg JW, Decker RH, Khan AM, et al. Surgery versus implant for early prostate cancer: results from a single institution, 1992-2005. CancerJ 2007,13:229-32.
  • 10Morris WJ, Keyes M, Palma D, et al. Population- based study of biochemical and survival outcomes after permanent 125I brachytherapy for low- and intermediate- risk prostate cancer. Urology 2009,73:860-5, discussion 865-7.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部