概念、规范与事实——在争鸣和探索中前行的中国宪法监督

Conception,Norm and Fact——Chinese supervision of constitution marching in controversy and exploration

我国宪法监督的发展无论在理论预设、制度构建还是相关事件或案例的处理上都一直处于探索与争鸣之中。宪法监督的概念总是和各种相关的术语纠缠在一起,宪法监督的法律关系尚未完全厘清,对宪法监督制度的模式选择也是观点纷呈、见仁见智,而现实生活中发生的相关宪法性事例更是反映了理论研究与制度供给方面的不足。因此,我们需要在概念的把握上进行文字和学理的双重梳理,为宪法监督的发展提供逻辑前提;在制度规范的建设上不仅要做好模式识别和比较工作,还要进一步做出中国式的制度安排;在对宪法监督事例的处理上则要充分发挥主导机关的权威功能和调动各类参与主体的积极性,为我国宪法监督的发展积累有益的经验素材。

The development about supervision of constitution in China has always been in exploration and controversy,whatever in theory presupposition,system construction or management about related events and cases.We are facing kinds of contradiction： the conception of constitution supervision is always confused with various correlative norms;the legal nexus of constitution supervision hasn＇t been differentiated totally;the views about pattern selection towards constitution supervision＇s system are individual from individual;moreover correlative cases about constitution happened in real life reflect more clearly the defects in theory study and system provision.Therefore,in order to furnish logical premise for the development of constitution supervision,we need carry out reduplicative pectination on word and doctrine based on the grasp about conception firstly;then we not only pay more attention to pattern identification and comparison in the construction of system nomination but also make China-pattern system arrangement fatherly;last but not the least,the leading offices should exert their power function and stimulate all kinds of participants＇ enthusiasm towards the deal with cases about constitution supervision,gathering more beneficial experience for the development of constitution supervision of China.