期刊文献+

从若即若离到分立制衡——对“司法强迁”中“裁执分离”模式的解读 被引量:2

From a Lukewarm Relationship to Discrete and Balance Relationship:A Reading on the Mode about Separating the Judicial Review Power from the Administrative Power in Judicial Demolition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 房屋征收与补偿领域中"司法强迁"的执行模式,由于强制执行主体不明,造成房屋拆迁监督体系的虚设和混乱。为此,最高法院在解读"司法强迁"时,明确提出"司法审查权与行政强制执行权分离"的模式,即"法院审查、政府实施"。但"裁执分离"在运行中,却面临行政权与司法权、中央立法与地方适法、立法现状与司法期望之间的冲突,导致两权的分离始终处于若即若离的状态。对此,建议在厘清司法与行政权力本质的基础上,理顺"裁"与"执"的关系,明确各环节分工和定位,充分发挥司法审查的制约功能,逐步剥离法院在执行环节的监督。同时,构建保障"裁执分离"模式良性运行的外在软性制度体系,并完善相应立法规制与体系。 Due to the fuzzy subject of executive mode about iudicial demolition in housing levy and compensation, the supervision system of house demolition is nominal and disordered. The supreme people's court of china clearly puts forwards the mode about separating the judicial review power from the administrative power which are that "the court reviews and the government execute". But in the operat- ing, there still exist the conflict of the administrative power and the judicial power, central legislation and legal application in local, current legislation and expectation of judicature which led to a lukewarm relationship between review power and administrative power. Hence, we should clear the relationship between the judicial review power and the administrative power based on definitize the nature of judicial and administrative power, give a clear division of labor and positioning, give full play to the restrictive function of the judicial review, detach gradually the supervision in the process of execution. At the same time, we should construct an external and flexible system to protect the mode to operate favorably and perfect the legislation and systemization.
出处 《福建行政学院学报》 2013年第3期62-68,共7页 Journal of Fujian Administration Institute
关键词 司法强迁 裁执分离 司法审查权 行政强制执行权 Judicial demolition Separation of two powers Judicial review power Administrative power
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献20

共引文献453

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部