摘要
我国通说认为不可抗力的判定标准采"折中说",在责任承担上法律规定可以免责。通过不可抗力制度历史渊源的追溯,原因力介入的考量,法理基础的评论,认为在司法实务中不可抗力的判断标准宜依具体情况灵活适用"主观说""客观说"与"折中说",在责任承担上应考虑原因力在损害中的比例,并且根据实际情况以公平责任原则分担损失。
The standard of force majeure in China is believed by Compromise Saying, and accountability could be exempted on law. By tracing back to the historical origin , the cause of the intervention and the comment legal basis , it is reasonable that the application of force majeurc criteria should be in accordance with the specific situation in the judi- cial practice flexibly, that is subjective or objective saying, compromise saying. The proportion should be considered as the reasons for the accountability, and it is better to share losses according to equitable liability in special situation.
出处
《成都师范学院学报》
2013年第7期20-23,共4页
Journal of Chengdu Normal University
关键词
不可抗力
原因力
责任承担
公平责任
Force majeure
casual force
accountability
fair responsibility