期刊文献+

莱考夫-约翰逊概念隐喻理论:批评质疑与发展 被引量:1

Lakoff & Johnson's Conceptual Metaphor Theory:Criticism and Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 莱考夫-约翰逊的概念隐喻理论自问世以来引发了学术界的批评质疑与讨论。讨论围绕"哲学新纪元"、"循环论证"、研究方法以及理论解释力等问题展开。尽管该理论的哲学贡献及"隐喻概念建构人类行为"的观点仍备受争议, 但是关于其研究方法和理论解释力的讨论则推动了理论的发展和完善。 Ever since it was proposed by Lakoff and Johnson, the conceptual metaphor theory ( CMT ) has aroused intense debate, which primarily concerns its theoretical status as "a new era in philosophy", the criticism of its circular argumentation, and the inquiry about its methodology and explanatory value. Despite the controversy over the philosophical significance of the CMT and its claim of "behavior ( partially ) structured by metaphorical concept", the discussions about its methodology and explanatory value have contributed to the development of the theory itself.
作者 孙旻 郭翠
出处 《东方论坛(青岛大学学报)》 2013年第3期94-100,共7页 Eastern Forum(JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY)
基金 山东省高等学校优秀青年教师国内访问学者项目
关键词 《我们赖以生存的隐喻》 概念隐喻理论 质疑 发展 Metaphors We Live By conceptual metaphor theory criticism development.
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Black, Max. Metaphors we live by (Book Review) [J]. Journal ofAesthetics & Art Criticism, 1981,(2): 208-211.
  • 2Dancygier, Barbara. Metaphors we live by (Book Review) [J].Canadian Literature^ 2005,(4): 142-143.
  • 3Dobrovolskij, D. & E. Piirainen. Figurative language: Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic perspective [M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier,2005.
  • 4Gibbs, R. W. Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory [J]. DiscourseProcesses, 2011,(48): 529-562.
  • 5Goodman, Nelson. Languages of art [M]. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.
  • 6Grady, J. Theories are buildings revisited [J]. Cognitive Linguistics,1997,(8): 267 - 290.
  • 7Grady, J. A typology of motivation for metaphor: Correlations vs.resemblances [A]. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (eds. ), Metaphor incognitive linguistics [C]. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1999.
  • 8Haser, Verena. Metaphor, metonymy, and experientialistphilosophy: Challenging cognitive semantics [M]. Berlin & NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005.
  • 9Kertesz, A.,& Rakosi, C. Cyclic vs. circular argumentation inconceptual metaphor theory [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 2009, (20):703 - 732.
  • 10Kovecses, Zoltan. Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticismsand alternative proposals [J]. Annual Review of CognitiveLinguistics, 2008, (6): 168-184.

二级参考文献22

  • 1Grady, J., Primitive and Compound Metaphors[C]. In Goldberg,A.E. (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language.(ibid.). 1996.
  • 2Indurkhya, B. , Metaphor and Cognition [M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1992.
  • 3Jackendoff, R., A Review of More Than Cool Reason [J]. Language 67/2,1991.
  • 4Keysar, B. et. al., Swimming against the current:Do idioms reflect conceptual structure[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 31, 1559-1578.1999.
  • 5Langacker, R. A Review of Women, Fire and Dangerous Things [J]. Language 64/2. 1988.
  • 6Lakoff, G & Johnson, M. , Metaphors We Live by [M]. Chicago:Univeristy of Chicago Press. 1980.
  • 7Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things [M] . Chicago:University of Chicago Press. 1987.
  • 8Lakoff, G. & Turner, M., More Than Cool Reason: A field Guide to Poetic Metaphor [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1989.
  • 9Lakoff, G. The Invariance principle: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 1, 39-47. 1990.
  • 10Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought [C]. Second edition,Cambridge: CUP. 1993.

共引文献53

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部