期刊文献+

事件相关电位P300和蒙特利尔认知评估量表对不同部位脑卒中患者早期认知功能的评估价值研究 被引量:15

The Value of Event Related Potential P300 and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Assessing Early Cognitive Function of Patients with Stroke in Different Brain Areas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨事件相关电位P300和蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)对不同部位脑卒中患者早期认知功能的评估价值。方法根据入选和排除标准选取2011年7月—2012年8月在我院神经内科住院部或门诊就诊的脑卒中患者101例为病例组,选取非脑卒中患者100例为对照组。根据梗死/出血灶的解剖部位,病例组患者又分为5组:额叶卒中组、颞叶卒中组、顶叶卒中组、枕叶卒中组、基底核区卒中组。应用MoCA、P300和简明精神状态检查表(MMSE)对所有受试者进行认知功能评估。结果病例组患者的MoCA评分、P300波幅均较对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);P300潜伏期较对照组延长,差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组比较:额叶、颞叶卒中组MoCA评分减低,P300波幅减低,P300潜伏期延长;顶叶卒中组MoCA评分减低;基底核区卒中组MoCA评分减低,P300潜伏期延长,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。组间比较:额叶、颞叶、基底核区卒中组与顶叶、枕叶卒中组比较,P300潜伏期延长;额叶、颞叶卒中组与基底核区卒中组比较,MoCA评分减低,P300潜伏期延长,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。病例组患者的执行功能/视空间、命名、延迟回忆、定向力得分较对照组低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。病例组MoCA和P300潜伏期最佳临界值为22分和397 ms,灵敏度和特异度分别为91.5%、85.7%和85.7%、55.3%。与MMSE比较Kappa值分别为0.712和0.654(P<0.01)。结论额叶、颞叶卒中患者认知功能受损最明显,MoCA和P300可识别不同部位脑卒中患者早期认知功能损害,截断值分别为22分和397 ms时,有较高的敏感度和特异度。 Objective To evaluate the value of event related potential P300(P300) and Montreal cognitive assessment(MoCA) in assessing early cognitive function of patients with stroke in different brain areas.Methods A total of 101 patients with stroke who visited the Inpatients and / or Outpatients of Neurology of our hospital between July 2011 and August 2012 were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and assigned as the study group,and another 100 patients without stroke were assigned as the control group.The patients in the study group were further divided according to the anatomic site of the infarction / bleeding lesion into five subgroups which were frontal lobe group,temporal lobe group,parietal lobe group,occipital lobe group,and basal ganglia group.The MoCA,P300,and mini mental state examination(MMSE) were used to determine the cognitive function of all subjects.Results The patients in the study group had lower MoCA score and P300 amplitude,but longer P300 latency than the control group(P〈 0.05).Compared with the control group,the frontal lobe and temporal lobe subgroups had lower MoCA score and P300 amplitude,but longer P300 latency;The parietal lobe subgroup had lower MoCA score;The basal ganglia subgroup had lower MoCA and longer P300 latency(P〈 0.05).The frontal lobe,temporal lobe,and basal ganglia subgroups had longer P300 latency than the parietal lobe and the occipital lobe subgroups,while the frontal lobe and temporal lobe subgroups had lower MoCA score and longer P300 latency than the basal ganglia subgroup(P〈 0.05).The patients in the study group had lower scores in executive function / visual space,naming,delayed recall,and orientation than the control group(P〈 0.05).The best cutoff value of MoCA was 22 score,with a sensitivity of 91.5% and a specificity of 85.7%,and that of P300 latency was 397 ms,with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 55.3% in the identification of cognitive dysfunction in the stroke patients.The Kappa value was 0.712 and 0.654 compared with MMSE(P〈 0.01).Conclusion Stroke in the frontal and temporal lobe may cause more serious cognitive dysfunction than stroke in other areas.MoCA and P300 latency can evaluate early cognitive function in stroke patients with high sensitivity and specificity at cutoff value of 22 score and 397 ms.
作者 刘忠玲 李华
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第20期2338-2342,共5页 Chinese General Practice
基金 新疆生产建设兵团科技攻关项目(2011BA041)
关键词 脑卒中 事件相关电位 P300 蒙特利尔认知评估量表 认知障碍 Stroke Event-related potentials P300 MoCA Cognition disorders
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Biernaskie J, Chemenko G, Corbett D. Efficacy of rehabilitative expe- rience declines with time after focal is chemic brain injury [ J ]. Neu- rosc, 2004, 24 (5) : 1245 -1254.
  • 2全国第四届脑血管病学术会议.脑血管疾病分类、诊断要点、脑卒中患者临床神经功能缺损程度评分标准.中华神经科杂志,1996,29:379-381.
  • 3黄如训,郭玉璞.2000年广州全国脑血管病专题研讨会脑卒中的分型分期治疗(建议草案)[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2001,27(1):73-75. 被引量:384
  • 4刘艳艳,杨忠现,沈智威,曹震,陈薇,吴仁华.非痴呆型血管性认知功能损害和轻度认知功能损害患者颅内代谢物的定量研究[J].中华精神科杂志,2013,46(1):32-36. 被引量:3
  • 5Loewenstem IJA, Aeevedo A, Agron J, et at. 12ogmtlve proliles in Alzheimer's disease and in mild cognitive impairment of different etiolo- gies [J]. Dement Gefiatr Cogn Disord, 2006, 21 (56) : 309 -315.
  • 6于靖.益智康脑丸治疗脑卒中后认知功能障碍的临床观察[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2012,20(4):722-722. 被引量:10
  • 7Radanovic M, Mansur I.L, Azambuja MJ, et al. Contribution to the e- valuation of language disturbances in subcortical lesions: a pilot study [J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 2004, 62 (1): 51-57.
  • 8Radanovie M, Azambuja M, Mansur LL, et al. Thalamus and lan- guage: interface with attention, memory and executive functions [ J ]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 2003, 61 (1): 34-42.
  • 9Rao SM, Leo GJ, Haughton VM, et al. Correlation of magnetic reso- nance imaging with neuropsyeholagical testing in multiple sclerosis [ J ]. Neurology, 2005, 39 (21): 161-166.
  • 10Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, ktirian V, et al. The Montreal Cogni- tive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive im- pairment [J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2005, 53 (4) : 695 -699.

二级参考文献22

  • 1冯涛.血管性认知功能损害的亚型研究进展[J].中国卒中杂志,2007,2(6):497-500. 被引量:13
  • 2中国防治认知功能障碍专家共识专家组.中国防治认知功能障碍专家共识[J].中华内科杂志,2006,45(2):171-173. 被引量:557
  • 3吴恩惠.头颅CT诊断学[M](第2版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.124.
  • 4Bowler JV.The concept of vascular cognitive impairment[J].J Neuro Sci,2002,203:11.
  • 5Rockwood K.Vascular cognitive impairment and vascular dementia[J].J Neuro Sci,2002,203:23.
  • 6Pantoni L, Gorelick P. Advances in vascular cognitive impairment 2010. Stroke,2011,42:291-293.
  • 7Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment: current research and clinical implications. Semin Neurol, 2007,27 : 22 -31.
  • 8Yang ZX, Huo SS, Cheng XF, et al. Quantitative muhivoxel proton MR spectroscopy study of brain metabolites in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment : a pilot study. Neuroradiology ,2012,54:451-458.
  • 9Stephan BC, Matthews FE, Khaw KT, et al. Beyond mild cognitive impairment: vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia (VCIND). Alzheimers Res Ther,2009,1:4.
  • 10den Heijer T, Sijens PE, Prins ND, et al. MR spectroscopy of brain white matter in the prediction of dementia. Neurology ,2006, 66:540-544.

共引文献442

同被引文献144

引证文献15

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部