期刊文献+

自身对照的病例系列研究方法在疫苗安全性评价中的应用 被引量:2

Self-controlled case-series (SCCS) method as a tool for the evaluation on the safety of vaccine
原文传递
导出
摘要 疫苗安全性备受关注。评估罕见发生的不良事件与疫苗接种的关联时,采用经典流行病学研究设计通常面临可行性不足的问题。自身对照的病例系列研究(sccs)方法是队列研究设计的一种衍生形式,其优点是只需收集病例的暴露史等信息,估计暴露和特定事件在风险期与对照期的相对危险度;由于以自身作为对照,所有固定的混杂变量自然得到控制,因而具有较高的检验效能,且具有高效、经济的特性,适用于发生率极低的严重预防接种不良事件因果关联评估。该方法最重要的限制条件是要求结局事件不对后继暴露产生影响。 Safety on vaccine issues has been under greater concern. Epidemiologically, classical study designs on investigating the association between a rare adverse event and vaccine inoculation usually confronted with lower feasibility in practice. Self-controlled case series (SCCS) method was derived from cohort studies. The key advantage of this method is that it only uses data related to cases and trying to find relative incidence of events in the ' at risk' periods relative to the 'controlled' periods. A further benefit of this method is that all the fixed confounders are controlled implicitly, by self-control, thus provides high statistic powers. With these advantages, SCCS is suitable for the causality assessment on rare but severe adverse events caused by immunization, which has been widely used, abroad. However, the methodology of SCCS is still being developed, and the areas in use have been expanded to the studies related to the safety and effectiveness of drugs, efficacy of vaccines as well as risk factors of disease.
出处 《中华流行病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期836-839,共4页 Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
基金 基金项目:浙江省医药卫生科技计划(2012zDA008)
关键词 病例系列研究 疫苗安全性 因果关联评估 Case series Vaccine safety Causality assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Farrington CP. Relative incidence estimation from case series for vaccine safety evaluation. Biometrics, 1995,51 ( 1 ) : 228-235.
  • 2Farrington P, Pugh S, Colville A, et al. A new method for active surveillance of adverse events from diphtheria/tetanus/pertussis and measles/mumps/rubella vaccines. Lancet, 1995,345 (8949) : 567-569.
  • 3Musonda P, Farrington CP, Whitaker HJ. Sample sizes for self- controlled case series studies. Star Med, 2006, 25 (15) : 2618-2631.
  • 4Musonda P. The self-controlled case series method: performance and design in studies of vaccine safety. Department of Statistics, Vol. Doctoral Milton Keynes: The Open University, 2006.
  • 5Whitaker HJ,Hocine MN,Farrington CP. The methodology of self-controlled case series studies. Stat Methods Med Res, 2009, 18(1):7-26.
  • 6Whitaker HJ,Farrington CP, Spiessens B, et al. Tutorial in biostatistics: the self-controlled case series method. Stat Med, 2006,25(10) : 1768-1797.
  • 7Farrington CP. Control without separate controls: evaluation of vaccine safety using case-only methods. Vaccine, 2004, 22 (15-16) :2064-2070.
  • 8Glanz JM, McClure DL, Xu S, et al. Four different study designs to evaluate vaccine safety were equally validated with contrasting limitations. J Clin Epidemiol, 2006,59 (8) : 808-818.
  • 9McClure DL, Glanz JM, Xu S, et al. Comparison of epidemiologic methods for active surveillance of vaccine safety. Vaccine, 2008, 26(26) :3341-3345.
  • 10Mullooly JP, Pearson J, Drew L, et al. Wheezing lower respiratory disease and vaccination of full-term infants. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2002,11 ( 1 ) : 21-30.

二级参考文献21

共引文献33

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部