期刊文献+

免疫型肠内营养在食管癌患者术后的应用比较 被引量:2

Clinical research on enteral immunonutrition in postoperative patients with esophageal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价食管癌术后患者早期肠内营养对患者营养状态、免疫功能、炎症反应和感染并发症的影响。方法将120例食管癌患者随机分为IEN组(免疫肠内营养组)和SEN组(标准肠内营养组)。所有患者均于术前和术后第1、4、9天分别检测营养指标(ALB、PA、TF)、免疫指标(IgA、IgG、IgM)和炎症指标(c3、C4、CRP),并观察记录术后肠道功能恢复时间及感染性并发症的发生情况。结果两组患者的胃肠道功能恢复时间比较差异无统计学意义,IEN组感染并发症少于SEN组。术后第9天,两组患者的营养指标比较差异无统计学意义(P〉O.05):IEN组的IgA、IgM和IgG水平显著高于SEN组,而IEN组C4、CRP水平显著低于SEN组(P〈0.05)。结论食管癌患者术后早期应用IEN能维持营养状态、恢复免疫功能、降低全身炎症反应,可能减少术后感染的发生。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of postoperative early enteral nutrition on nutrient status, immune function, stress status and infectious complications in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods Total 120 patients with esophageal cancer were randomly divided into two groups: IEN group(immune-enhancing enteral nutrition)and SEN group (standard enteral nutrition). The levels of nutrition status (HGB, ALB, TF), immune function (IgA, IgG, IgM) and stress status (C3, C4, CRP) were detected before operation and on postoprative 1, 4, 9 days. The postoperative infection and bowel function were observed. Results There was no statistic difference between the two groups on bow- el function, but the postoperative infection in IEN group was less than in SEN group. On the 9th day after operation, there was no statistic difference between each group on the serum levels of nutrition index ( P 〉 0.05 ). The serum levels of tgA, IgM and IgG in IEN group were significantly higher than those in SEN group, while the serum levels of C4 and CRP in IEN group were significantly lower than those in SEN group (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions The application of postoperative early IEN with esophageal cancer can maintain normal nutrition status, enhance immune function, lower systemic inflammatory reaction in patients.
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2013年第16期42-44,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 肠内免疫营养 食管癌 营养状态 免疫功能 炎症反应 Enteral immunonutrition Esophageal cancer Nutrition status Immune function Inflammatory reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献108

  • 1Qiang Pu Chen Department of Heptobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou 256603, Shandong Province, China.Enteral nutrition and acute pancreatitis[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2001,7(2):185-192. 被引量:15
  • 2陈伟,蒋朱明,张永梅,王秀荣,陈春明,史轶蘩.欧洲营养不良风险调查方法在中国住院患者的临床可行性研究[J].中国临床营养杂志,2005,13(3):137-141. 被引量:216
  • 3谢天鹏,赵雍凡,李强,彭林.食管癌术后早期全肠内营养支持的实施及并发症防治[J].中国临床营养杂志,2006,14(2):134-135. 被引量:10
  • 4郑春鹏,傅俊惠,郑海波,吴智勇.食管癌贲门癌术后早期肠内营养治疗的临床研究[J].中国医师进修杂志(外科版),2007,30(7):51-53. 被引量:8
  • 5August DA, Huhmann MB. A. S. P. E. N. clinical guidelines: nutrition support therapy during adult anticancer treatment and in hematopoietic cell transplantation [ J ]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2009, 33(5):472-500.
  • 6Bozzetti F, Arends J, Lundholm K, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: non-surgical oncology[ J]. Clin Nutr, 2009, 28(4) :445 -454.
  • 7Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition : surgery[ J]. Clin Nutr, 2009, 28 (4) :378 - 386.
  • 8Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition : Surgery including organ transplantation[J]. Clin Nutr, 2006, 25(2) :224 -244.
  • 9Arends J, Bodoky G, Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition : Non-surgical oncology [J]. Clin Nutr, 2006, 25 (2) :245 -259.
  • 10Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2011, 12(5) :489 -495.

共引文献426

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部