基层公务员绩效问责的困境--基于“街头官僚”理论的分析被引量：30

Performance-based Accountability Predicament of Street-level Bureaucrats—From the Perspective of Street-level Bureaucrats Theory

原文传递

导出

摘要通过绩效目标的达成情况来控制基层公务员的行为是一种新型的问责模式,与新公共管理"结果导向"的管理理念具有内在契合之处。但达成绩效目标所要求的基层公务员能够根据具体情境自由裁量的权力,同样蕴含着潜在的风险,在问责过程中带来"可计量任务‘驱逐’不可计量任务"、"选择性执行"以及"绩效悖论"等困境。此外,环境的复杂性、"运动式治理"方式以及冲突性的问责要求等不可控因素,使基层公务员的绩效问责充满不确定性。因此,有必要对"绩效"与"问责"的假设关系进行更深入的反思。 Performance--based accountability is a new accountability model which is derived from ＂result--oriented＂ ideas of NPM. There are some predicament such as ＂ measurable tasks drive out immeasurable task＂, ＂selective en-forcement＂ and performance paradox during the process of performance--based accountability due to the environmental uncertainty and substantial discretion. Furthermore, the outcome of performance--based accountability is deeply affected by a lot of uncertain factors, eg. the complexity of governance environment, ＂mobilized governance＂ model and competing accountability requirements. Thus, it＇s necessary to think deeply about the relationship between ＂performance＂ and ＂accountability＂.

作者颜海娜聂勇浩

机构地区华南师范大学政治与行政学院副教授中山大学资讯管理学院讲师

出处《中国行政管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期58-61,共4页 Chinese Public Administration

基金国家社科基金重大项目“公众幸福指数导向下的我国政府绩效评价体系研究”(项目编号:11&ZD057) 教育部青年基金项目“治理转型导向的地方政府绩效评估体系创新”(项目编号:12YJC630261) 广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划青年项目“网格化服务监管背景下的工商部门绩效评估指标体系构建”(项目编号:GD10YZZ03)的阶段性成果

关键词绩效问责基层公务员街头官僚 performance-- based accountability, local servant, street-- level bureaucrats

分类号 D035 [政治法律—政治学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1Lipsky, M. Street- Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Indi- vidual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2004.
2Bohte, J. & Meier, J. Goal Displacement: Assessing the Motivation for Organizational Cheating. Public Administration Review, 2000,60 (2).
3Stone, D. Policy Paradox & Political Reason. NY: Harper Collins, 1998.
4Hupe, P. & Hill, M. Street--level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability. Public Administration, 2007,85(2).
5Carrington, K. Street--level Discretion: Is There a Need for Control? Public Administration Quarterly, 2005,29(2).
6Keiser, L.R. Street Bureaucratic Discretion and the Administration of Social Welfare Programs: The Case of Social Security Disability. Journal of Public Ad- ministration Research &Theory, 1999,9(1).
7Brodkin, E.Z. Accountability in Street--level Organi- zations. International Journal of Public Administra- tion, 2008,31(3).
8Wilson, J.Q. Bureaucracy : What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do it?. New York: Basic Books, 1989.
9O'Brien, K. J & Li, L. Selectively Policy Imple- mentation in Rural China. Comparative Politics, 1999,31(2).
10Thiel, S. V & Leeuw, F.L. The Per- formance Paradox in the Public Sector. Public Per-formance & Management Review, 2002,25(3).

二级参考文献20

1吴建南,阎波.谁是“最佳”的价值判断者:区县政府绩效评价机制的利益相关主体分析[J].管理评论,2006,18(4):46-53. 被引量：69
2周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007,42(7):36-50. 被引量：5671
3Mark Bovens, Thomas Schillemans, Hart PT. Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool [ J ]. Public Administration, 2008, 86 ( 1 ).
4Bovens M. Analyzing and Assessing Public Accountability: A Conceptual Framework [ J ]. European Law Journal, 2007,13 (4).
5Philp M. Delimiting Democratic Accountability [ J ]. Political Studies, 2009, 57 ( I ).
6Lindberg SI. Accountability: The Core Concept and Its Subtypes [ J ]. The Africa Power and Politics Programme Discussion Paper UK Department for International Development & Irish Aid, 2009.
7Melvin Dubnick, Yang K. The Pursuit of Accountability : Promise, Problems, and Prospects [ A ]. In: Donald Menzel, White H, editors. THE STATE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION[C]. M.E. Sharpe, 2010.
8Heroes T. Four Ideal-Type Organizational Responses to New Public Management Reforms and Some Consequences [ J ]. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2005, 71 ( 1 ).
9Koppell JG. Pathologies of Accountability : ICANN and the Challenge of "Multiple Accountabilities Disorder" [J]. Public Administration Review, 2005, 65 ( 1 ).
10Gwyn Bevan, Hood C. What's Measured is What Matters : Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System [ J ]. Public Administration, 2006, 84(3).