形式解释论在中国司法实践中的倡导

Introducing Formalistic Interpretation to Judicial Practice

形式解释论和实质解释论，作为两种不同的解释立场，在中国刑法领域中引起了不同程度的纷争。学者关注的焦点主要是两种解释是否能坚守罪刑法定原则。从对司法实践中的案例的分析看，形式解释论有利于维护刑法中行为主义、有利于恪守罪刑法定原则、有利于引进德日阶层犯罪论体系，在目前中国的司法实践中应该倡导形式解释论。

Formalistic interpretation theory and substantive interpretation theory are, to a respectively different extent, controverial as the criterion for explanatroy stand in the field of China＇s criminal law. The present writer primarily focuses on the point as to whether the principle of a prescribed punishment for a specified crime can be implemented by adopting the above two explanations. An analysis of the judicial cases in the paper shows that formalistic interpretation theory is beneficial in three ways., first, to the defense of behaviorism occured in criminal law cases, second, to the observation of the principle of a prescribed punishment for a specified crime and finally to the introduction of Germany and Japan＇s hierarchical criminology system. Therefore, it is suggested that formal explanation theory be adovated in current judicial practice of China.