期刊文献+

英国高等教育系统科研评估制度最新改革及评鉴 被引量:6

下载PDF
导出
摘要 英国作为长期开展全国高等教育系统科研工作评估的国家,计划在2010—2014年实施新的高等教育系统科研评估制度(REF)。介绍了REF的产生背景、工作思路、实施程序、工作方法、评审内容及标准,并对该项制度体现的科技政策导向、工作目标定位、工作模式转变、社会对该项制度的认识等进行了梳理和分析。
作者 刘娅
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第15期150-156,共7页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1HEFCE,et al. History of the RAE[EB/OL]. http://www. rae. ac. uk/aboutus/background, asp. [2012-04-11].
  • 2ROBERTS G. Review of research assessment[EB/OL], http://www, ra-review, ac. uk/reports/roberts/roberts sum mary. pdf. [2012-06-11].
  • 3GEUNA A,B R MARTIN. University research evaluation and funding: an international comparison[J]. Minerva, 2003(41) : 277-304.
  • 4OECD. Governance of public research: toward better prac tice[R]. 2003.
  • 5HICKS D. Evolving regimes of multi-university research e- valuation[R]. March, 2008.
  • 6徐洁.英国RAE大学科研评估制度述评[J].高等工程教育研究,2008,56(3):137-140. 被引量:7
  • 7HEFCE. Annual report and accounts 2008-09 [R]. 2009.
  • 8HEFCE. Annual report and accounts 2009-10 [R]. 2010.
  • 9HEFCE. Annual report and accounts 2010-11 [R]. 2011.
  • 10HEFCE. Annual report and accounts 2011-12 [R]. 2012.

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1]Higher education funding council.Funding higher education in England.http://www.hefce.ac.uk/Pubs/hefce/2006/06_17/c6_17.pdf2006-05.17/2006-11-02.
  • 2[3]Hefcw.The QR funding formula.http://194.81.48.132/SectorManagement.Docs/QR funding formula.pdf.2004-06-23/2006-10-22.
  • 3[4]HEFCE.How HEFCE allocates its fundshttp://www.hefce.ac.uk/Pubs/hefce/2005/05_34/05_34.pdf.2005-06-02/2006-10-10.
  • 4[5]Gorard,Stephen.Is there a shortage of quantitative work in education research?,Oxford Review of Education,Vol.30,No.3,2004,(9):371~395.
  • 5[6]Gareth Roberts.Review of Research Asaesment.http://www.ra-review.ac.uk/reports/roberts/ruberts-summary.pdf.2003-05-10/2006-11-01.
  • 6[7]V.LynnMeek/JeannetJ.van derLee.Performance indicators for assessing and benchmarking research capacities in university.http://www2.unescobkk.org/dib/publications/05APEIDseriea/APEIDseries.No2.Pdf.2005-05-10/2006-10-10.

共引文献6

同被引文献80

  • 1朱继光.英国高等教育质量保障机制特点及启示[J].南昌教育学院学报,2009,24(1):20-22. 被引量:1
  • 2王兵,程永元,黄红富.学科评估的技术与理念关系的辩证思考[J].学位与研究生教育,2005(11):51-54. 被引量:7
  • 3郝连科,王以宁,王永锋.中国高等网络教育质量问题:英国的启示[J].现代教育技术,2007,17(11):55-57. 被引量:7
  • 4HEFCE 2009. Report on the pilot exercise to develop bib- liometric indicators for the Research Excellence Framework [EB/OL]. (2009 -09). http'J/www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce 1/pubs/ hefce/2009/O939/O9_39.pdf.
  • 5REF. 2014:Assessment framework and guidance on submis- sions[EB/OL]. (2011-02 ). http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/ eontent/pub/assessmenfframeworkandguidanceonsubmissions/ GOS%20including%20addendum.pdf.
  • 6ROSENSTREICH D,WOOLISCROFT B. Measuring the im- pact of accounting journals using Google Scholar and the g- index[J]. The British Accounting Review , 2009 , 41 (g) :227-239.
  • 7SGROI D,OSWALD A J. How should peer-review panels behave?[J]. The Economic Journal,2013,123(570):F255- F278.
  • 8TREVORROW P,VOLMER D A. Dispelling the myths sur- rounding the Research Excellence Framework[J]. Rapid Com- munications in Mass Spectrometry, 2012,26 (4) : 399-402.
  • 9MAHDI S,D'ESTE P,NEELY A. Citation counts:are they good predictors of RAE scores? a bibliometric analysis of RAE 2001[EB/OL]. (2008). https://dspace.lib.cranfieid.ac. uk/bitstream/1826/2248/1/citation% 20Counts% 20Are% 20 They% 20Good% 20Predictors% 20Of% 20RAE% 20Scores - 2008.pdf.
  • 10REF 2014:a brief guide for research users[EB/OL]. (2012- 12-12). http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/researchusers/ REF%20guide.pdf.

引证文献6

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部