期刊文献+

Non-dominated sorting quantum particle swarm optimization and its application in cognitive radio spectrum allocation 被引量:4

Non-dominated sorting quantum particle swarm optimization and its application in cognitive radio spectrum allocation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In order to solve discrete multi-objective optimization problems, a non-dominated sorting quantum particle swarm optimization (NSQPSO) based on non-dominated sorting and quantum particle swarm optimization is proposed, and the performance of the NSQPSO is evaluated through five classical benchmark functions. The quantum particle swarm optimization (QPSO) applies the quantum computing theory to particle swarm optimization, and thus has the advantages of both quantum computing theory and particle swarm optimization, so it has a faster convergence rate and a more accurate convergence value. Therefore, QPSO is used as the evolutionary method of the proposed NSQPSO. Also NSQPSO is used to solve cognitive radio spectrum allocation problem. The methods to complete spectrum allocation in previous literature only consider one objective, i.e. network utilization or fairness, but the proposed NSQPSO method, can consider both network utilization and fairness simultaneously through obtaining Pareto front solutions. Cognitive radio systems can select one solution from the Pareto front solutions according to the weight of network reward and fairness. If one weight is unit and the other is zero, then it becomes single objective optimization, so the proposed NSQPSO method has a much wider application range. The experimental research results show that the NSQPS can obtain the same non-dominated solutions as exhaustive search but takes much less time in small dimensions; while in large dimensions, where the problem cannot be solved by exhaustive search, the NSQPSO can still solve the problem, which proves the effectiveness of NSQPSO. In order to solve discrete multi-objective optimization problems, a non-dominated sorting quantum particle swarm optimization (NSQPSO) based on non-dominated sorting and quantum particle swarm optimization is proposed, and the performance of the NSQPSO is evaluated through five classical benchmark functions. The quantum particle swarm optimization (QPSO) applies the quantum computing theory to particle swarm optimization, and thus has the advantages of both quantum computing theory and particle swarm optimization, so it has a faster convergence rate and a more accurate convergence value. Therefore, QPSO is used as the evolutionary method of the proposed NSQPSO. Also NSQPSO is used to solve cognitive radio spectrum allocation problem. The methods to complete spectrum allocation in previous literature only consider one objective, i.e. network utilization or fairness, but the proposed NSQPSO method, can consider both network utilization and fairness simultaneously through obtaining Pareto front solutions. Cognitive radio systems can select one solution from the Pareto front solutions according to the weight of network reward and fairness. If one weight is unit and the other is zero, then it becomes single objective optimization, so the proposed NSQPSO method has a much wider application range. The experimental research results show that the NSQPS can obtain the same non-dominated solutions as exhaustive search but takes much less time in small dimensions; while in large dimensions, where the problem cannot be solved by exhaustive search, the NSQPSO can still solve the problem, which proves the effectiveness of NSQPSO.
出处 《Journal of Central South University》 SCIE EI CAS 2013年第7期1878-1888,共11页 中南大学学报(英文版)
基金 Foundation item: Projects(61102106, 61102105) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Project(2013M530148) supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project(HEUCF120806) supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China
关键词 粒子群优化算法 量子计算 频谱分配 认知无线电 应用 排序 网络利用率 多目标优化问题 cognitive radio spectrum allocation multi-objective optimization non-dominated sorting quantum particle swarmoptimization benchmark function
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1SRINIVAS N, DEB K. Mutiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms [J]. Evolutionary Computation, 1994,2(3): 221-248.
  • 2DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, MEYARIVAN T. A fast and elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization: NSGA II [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197.
  • 3ZITZLER E, THIELE L. Multiobjective^volutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1999, 3(3): 257-271.
  • 4ZITZLER E, LAUMANNS M, THIELE L. SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithms [C]// Evolutionary for Design, Optimization and Control with Application to an Industrial Problems (EUROGEN2001). Barcelona, Spain, 2002: 95-100.
  • 5高成,黄姣英,孙悦,刁胜龙.Particle swarm optimization based RVM classifier for non-linear circuit fault diagnosis[J].Journal of Central South University,2012,19(2):459-464. 被引量:5
  • 6MONTES DE OCA M A, STUTZLE T, BIRATTARI M, DORIGO M. Frankenstein’s PSO: A composite particle swarm optimization algorithm [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2009, 13(5): 1120-1132.
  • 7COIN A. Ant colony algorithms [J], Dr Dobb’s Journal, 2006, 31(9): 46-51.
  • 8Mahdiyeh Eslami,Hussain Shareef,Azah Mohamed.Power system stabilizer design using hybrid multi-objective particle swarm optimization with chaos[J].Journal of Central South University,2011,18(5):1579-1588. 被引量:9
  • 9ZHANG Jun, CHUNG H S H, LO A W L, HUANG Tao. Ended ant colony optimization algorithm for power electronic circuit design [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2009, 24(1): 147-162.
  • 10HEY T. Quantum computing: An introduction [J]. Computing & Control Engineering Journal, 1999, 10(3): 105—112.

二级参考文献34

  • 1BASLER M J, SCHAEFER R C. Understanding power system stability [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2008, 44(2): 463-474.
  • 2KUNDUR P, KLEIN M, ROGERS G, ZYWNO M S. Application of power system stabilizers for enhancement of overall system stability [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2002, 4(2): 614-626.
  • 3CAI L, ERLICH I. Simultaneous coordinated tuning of PSS and FACTS damping controllers in large power systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2005, 20(1): 294-300.
  • 4ABDEL-MAGID Y L, ABIDO M A. Optimal multi-objective design of robust power system stabilizers using genetic algorithms [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2003, 18(3): 1125-1132.
  • 5SEBAA K, BOUDOUR M. Optimal locations and tuning of robust power system stabilizer using genetic algorithms [J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2009, 79(2): 406-416.
  • 6ABIDO M A. Robust design of multimachine power system stabilizers using simulated annealing [J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2002, 15(3): 297-304.
  • 7ABIDO M A. A novel approach to conventional power system stabilizer design using tabu search [J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 1999, 21 (6): 443-454.
  • 8ABIDO M A, ABDEL-MAGID Y L. Optimal design of power system stabilizers using evolutionary programming [J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2002, 17(4): 429-436.
  • 9MISHRA S, TRIPATHY M, NANDA J. Multi-machine power system stabilizer design by rule based bacteria foraging [J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2007, 77(12): 1595-1607.
  • 10KENNEDY J, EBERHART R. Particle swarm optimization [C]// IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. Perth, Australia. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, 1995: 1942-1948.

共引文献12

同被引文献12

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部