期刊文献+

锥形束CT测量健康成年人髁突位置的研究 被引量:1

Cone-beam computed tomography study about condylar position of healthy adults
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用锥形束CT(CBCT)测量技术定量评价健康成年人的髁突位置,并对髁突位置的三维测量方法进行探讨。方法筛选50例颞下颌关节健康的成年志愿者进行头颅CBCT扫描,使用Simplant 13.0软件测量髁突在矢状位、轴位和冠状位的相对位置,并进行双侧髁突位置对称性的比较。结果关节上间隙(冠状位)的均值为(4.04±0.93)mm;髁突半径值(轴位)均值为(54.14±2.77)mm;髁突在关节窝内的相对位置(矢状位)(AE’/AC)为(49.27±4.04)%;双侧髁突位置(关节上间隙、髁突半径值及髁突在关节窝内的相对位置)测量结果 ,差异均无统计学意义(t分别=-0.69、-1.93、0.74,P均>0.05)。结论健康成年人髁突位于关节窝中位,双侧髁突位置基本对称;CBCT影像测量是评价髁突位置的有效方法之一。 Objective To evaluate the condylar position by using cone-beam computed tomography and explore the three dimensional method to measure condylar position. Methods Fifty volunteers whose temporal-mandibular joints were healthy were selected and scanned by CBCT. Simplant 13.0 software was used to measure the condylar relative position in sagittal, axial and coronal and make comparison of symmetry of bilateral condylar position. Results The mean distance of the coronal, axial, sagittal (A E'/AC ) were (4.04±0.93)mm,(54.14±2.77) mm,(49.27±4.04)%respectively. There was no statistic significance among bilateral condyles (t=-0.69,-1.93,0.74,P〉0.05). Conclusions The condylar position of healthy adults is lying the centre of glenoid fossa, and their bilateral condyles are almost symmetric. CBCT measurement is an effective method to evaluate the condylar position.
出处 《全科医学临床与教育》 2013年第4期391-393,共3页 Clinical Education of General Practice
关键词 髁突 锥形束CT 测量学 condyle cone-beam computed tomography metrology
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Adams GL, Gansky SA, Miller AJ, et al.Comparison be- tween traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-di- mensional approach on human dry skulls[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2004,126(4) : 397-409.
  • 2Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE Jr. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2011,40( 1 ) : 24-34.
  • 3王瑞永,马绪臣,张万林,柳登高.健康成年人颞下颌关节间隙锥形束计算机体层摄影术测量分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2007,39(5):503-506. 被引量:58
  • 4曹均凯,王照五,刘洪臣,胡敏,姜华.54例正常人双侧颞下颌关节CBCT测量值分析[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2008,9(4):291-294. 被引量:34
  • 5Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazto DC, et al. Accuracy and re- liability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalome- try and 3D measurements on CBCT scans[J]. Angle Orthod, 2011,81(1):26-35.
  • 6Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, et al. Observer re- liability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark iden- tification on cone-beam computerized tomography[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 107 (2) : 256-265.
  • 7Learreta JA, Barrientos EE. Temporomandibular Joint Me- thod to study the morphology and relationship of the hard structures[J]. J Craniomandibular pract, 2010, 28(4):223- 231.
  • 8姜华,王照五,刘洪臣,胡敏,曹均凯,石校伟.牙颌专用CT对颞下颌关节骨性结构的测量技术[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2008,6(2):84-86. 被引量:18
  • 9Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, et al. Tomographic as- sessment .of temporomandibular joints in patients with mal- occlusion[J]. Angle Orthod, 1996,66( 1 ) : 27-35.

二级参考文献26

共引文献96

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部