期刊文献+

教学学术能力:大学教师发展与评价的新框架 被引量:209

Scholarship of Teaching:A New Framework of Faculty Development and Evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 教学学术能力体现了科教融合的理念,强调大学教师的发展包括学术发展和教学发展。建构教学学术能力的主体是大学和教师,大学教师的发展是个人发展和组织变革的结合。教学学术能力不是一个静态的概念,而是一项广泛的政策议程。教学学术能力应该成为学术职业管理政策的组成部分。教学学术能力主要通过课程开发和教学设计能力来表征,这是建构大学教师胜任力特征模型的基础。教师胜任力特征模型由学术能力、教学能力和教学态度三个特征因子构成。教学学术能力概念不但是评价大学教师的有力工具,也是评价大学核心竞争力的重要指标。作为一个复杂的政策概念,教学学术能力应成为大学战略中优先考虑的重点。 Scholarship of Teaching (ST) has embodied the idea of integration of research with teaching, which has emphasized on faculty development including the academic development and teaching development. The university and faculty are the principal parts of ST construction, and the faculty development is the combination of personal development and organizational change. ST is not a static concept, but a broad policy agenda. ST should become the component of the management policy of academic occupation. ST is mainly characterized by the ability of curriculum development and teaching design, which is the basis of constructing faculty competency model. The faculty competency mode/consists of the three factors as academic ability, teaching ability and teaching attitudes. The concept of ST is not only a powerful means for faculty evaluation, but also an important index to evaluate the core competence of university. As a complex concept of policy, ST should be a priority in the strategy of university.
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期37-47,共11页 Educational Research
关键词 教学学术能力 科教融合 大学教师评价 大学教师胜任力模型 scholarship of teaching, integration of research with teaching, faculty evaluation, faculty competencymodel
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Simpson, R. O., Jackson, W. K. A Muhidimensional Holistic Approach to Faculty Renewal [A]. D. W. Wheeler & Associates. Enhancing faculty careem : Strategies for renewal [C]. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1990. 166-187.
  • 2菲利普·沃尔夫.欧洲的觉醒[M].北京:商务印书馆,1990.
  • 3Berquist W H, Phillips S R. A Handbook for Faculty Development (Vol. 2) [M]. Washington, D. C.: Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges, 1977.326.
  • 4林杰.美国大学教师发展运动的历程、理论与组织[J].比较教育研究,2006,27(12):30-34. 被引量:41
  • 5王立.美国大学教师发展理念的演变与启示[J].中国高教研究,2011(2):49-51. 被引量:25
  • 6Boyer E. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professorate [ M ]. Jossey-Bass, 1997.16.
  • 7National Education Association. Faculty Dewlopmcnt in Higher Education : Enhancing a National Resource [ M ]. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1991.11-12.
  • 8周光礼.高校人才培养模式创新的深层次探索[J].中国高等教育,2012(10):23-25. 被引量:98
  • 9Pat Hutchings, et al. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. An Annotated Bibliography [J]. Political Science and Politics, 2002, (2).
  • 10Astin, A. W. Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education [J]. Journal of College Student Development, 1999, (5).

二级参考文献28

  • 1乔连全,吴薇.大学教师发展与高等教育质量——第四次高等教育质量国际学术研讨会综述[J].高等教育研究,2006,27(11):106-109. 被引量:50
  • 2林杰.美国大学教师发展运动的历程、理论与组织[J].比较教育研究,2006,27(12):30-34. 被引量:41
  • 3明轩.世界高等教育宣言概要.教育发展研究,1999,(3).
  • 4Pareto Vilfredo. The Mind and Society(The 3rd vol )[M]. London: Jonathan Cape,1935:1422-1423.
  • 5Mosca Gaetano.The Ruling Class[M].New York: McGraw-Hill,1939:53.
  • 6[英]巴特摩尔.平等还是精英[M].尤卫军,译.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社.1989:13.
  • 7Ellwood Patterson Cubberley. Public Education in the United States [ M ]. New York : General books LLc,2009:265.
  • 8[美]刘易斯·科塞.理念人:一项社会学的考察[M].郭方,等,译.北京:中国编译出版社,2001:304.
  • 9Berquist W H, Phillips S R. A Handbook for Faculty Development(Vol 2) [ M ].Washington,D.C.:Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges,1977:326.
  • 10Mackeachie W J.What theories underlie the Practice of Faculty Development? [ G ]//Zahorski,Kenneth J.To Improve The Academy:Resource for Faculty,Institutional,and Organizational Development.Stillwater, OK:New Forums Press, 1991:3-8.

共引文献162

同被引文献1609

引证文献209

二级引证文献1762

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部