期刊文献+

局部进展期宫颈癌同步放化疗的临床随机对照研究 被引量:3

Clinical randomized study of concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy with local advanced cervical cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较强调的两种放疗方式并同步化疗治疗局部进展期宫颈癌,评价其治疗反应情况和疗效。方法符合入组条件的Ⅱa-Ⅲb。期宫颈癌患者采用信封法随机分组,研究组制定IMRT放疗计划,对宫颈原发病灶予以45Gy/22次,盆壁淋巴引流区50Gy/22次;对照组靶区设定标准同研究组,采用四野盒式照射45Gy/22次,其后予以盆壁补充6Gy/3次。两组患者同期化疗方案相同,给予奈达铂30mg/m2,每周1次,共6周期化疗。后装治疗于外照射3~4周开始,每次6Gy,共6次,A点总剂量36Gy。结果自2006年9月至2009年9月,共招募72例患者,其中研究组36例,对照组36例。两组在恶心呕吐、血红蛋白下降、中性粒细胞下降等差异均无统计学意义;研究组Ⅲ级腹泻发生率为5.6%;对照组Ⅲ级腹泻发生率为30.6%,两组Ⅲ-Ⅳ级腹泻发生率比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=31.35,P〈0.05)。1、2、3年生存率分别为94.4%、86.1%、77.8%,1、2、3年无瘤生存率分别为91.7%、75.0%、72.2%,对照组1、2、3年生存率分别为91.7%、86.1%、75.0%,1、2、3年无瘤生存率分别为91.7%、72.2%、69.4%,差异无统计学意义。结论宫颈癌调强放疗并同步化疗可以明显减少急性直肠炎的发生率,总生存率与无病生存率与四野盒式照射相似。 Objective To study two different methods of radiotherapy and their side-effects in treating local advanced cervical cancer. Methods Eligible patients with stage Ⅱa-Ⅲb cervical cancer were randomly divided into the study group and the control group. The patients in the study group were irradiated to 45 Gy/22 fractions at primary lesions and 50 Gy/22 fractions at lymphatic drainage using IMRT followed by high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (36 Gy/6 fractions). The control group had the same target range sizes as the study group, and the patients were irradiated to 45 Gy/22 fractions at pelvic cavity and additional 6 Gy/3 fractions at pelvic wall using four-field cassette technique followed by high- dose rate (HDR) braehytherapy (36/6 fractions ). Both groups were treated with concurrent chemotherapy, by nedaplatin 30 mg/m2 weekly for a total of 6 cycles. Results Between Sep 2006 and Sep 2009, 72 patients were enrolled into the study, and 36 cases were assigned in the study group and 36 cases in the control group. Nausea and vomiting, decline of hemoglobin and neutrophil were similar in two groups. Grade diarrhea in the study group and the control group was 5.6% and 30. 6% , respectively, with significant difference in diarrhea. 1-, 2-and 3-year overall survival rates of the study group were 94.4% , 86.1% , 77.8% , and 1-, 2-and 3-year disease-free survival rate were 91.7% , 75.0% , 72.2% in the study group, and 1-, 2-and 3-year overall survival rate were 91.7% , 86. 1% , 75.0% , and 1-, 2- and 3-year disease-free survival rate were 91.7% , 72.2% , 69.4% in the control group, respectively. There were no significant differences for overall survival and disease-free survival between two groups. Conclusions Intensity modulated radiation therapy with cervical cancer can reduce significantly the rate of acute proctitis. Overall survival and disease-free survival might be similar in two groups.
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期286-289,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
关键词 子宫颈癌 调强放疗 毒性反应 临床疗效 Cervical cancer Intensity-modulated radiotherapy Toxicity Clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献58

  • 1张书旭,徐海荣,林生趣,李文华.宫颈癌调强放疗和三维适形放疗剂量对比研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2004,21(5):252-254. 被引量:23
  • 2陈真云,盛修贵,李慧芹,李庆水,李大鹏,马志芳,马悦冰,李庆菊.调强放射治疗在宫颈癌术后治疗中的临床研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(7):539-542. 被引量:16
  • 3[1]Jewett HJ. The present status of radical prostatectomy for stages A and B prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am, 1975, 2:105
  • 4[2]Ravery V, Boccon-Gibod LA, Dauge-Geffroy MC, et al. Systematic biopsies accurately predict extracapsular extension of prostate cancer and psistent/recurrent detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy. Urology, 1994, 44:371
  • 5[3]Kestin LY, Goldstein NS, Vicini FA, et al. Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: Should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002, 54:686
  • 6[4]Bagshaw M. Radiotherapeutic treatment of prostate cancer with pelvic node Involvement. Urol Clin North Am, 1984, 11:297
  • 7[5]Asbell SO, Martz KL, Shin KH, et al. Impact of surgical stage in evaluating the radiotherapeutic outcome in RTOG 77-06,aphase Ⅲ study forT1BN0Mo (A2) AndT2N0M0 (B) prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1998, 40:769
  • 8[6]Roach Ⅲ M, DeSilvio M, Lawton C, et al. Phase Ⅲ trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression:Radiation therapy oncology group 9413. J Clin, Oncol, 2003,21:1904
  • 9[7]Haken RKT, Forman JD, Heimburger DK, et al. Treatment planning issues related to prostate movement in response to differential filling of the rectum and bladder. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 20:1991, 1317
  • 10[8]Langen KM., Jones TL, et al. Organ motion and its management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2001, 50:265

共引文献31

同被引文献56

  • 1陈涛利,卞翠翠,杨雷,刘子玲.早期高危宫颈癌患者术后不同治疗方案的临床疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(1):55-57. 被引量:25
  • 2Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014,64(1) :9-29.
  • 3Sakurai H, Mitsuhashi N, Takahashi M, et al. Analysis of recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiation therapy alone: patterns of recurrence, latent periods, and prognosis[ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2001, 50(5) :1136-1144.
  • 4Niibe Y, Kenjo M, Kazumoto T, et al. Multi-institutional study of radiation therapy for isolated para-aortie lymph node recurrence in uterine cervical carcinoma: 84 subjects of a population of more than5,000[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006,66(5): 1366-1369.
  • 5Hong JH, Tsai CS, Lai CH, et al. Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of cervix after definitive radiotherapy[ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004,60( 1 ) :249-257.
  • 6Liu SP, Huang X, Ke GH, et al. 3D radiation therapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy for recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer: the Shanghai Cancer Hospital experience [J]. PLoS One, 2012,7 :e40299.
  • 7Ahmed RS, Kim RY, Duan J, et al. IMRT dose escalation for positive para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer while reducing dose to bone marrow and other organs at risk[ J]. Int J Radiat Onco| Biol Phys, 2004,60 (2): 505 -51-2.
  • 8Singh AK, Grigsby PW, Rader JS, et al. Cervix carcinoma, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and salvage of isolated paraaortic lymph node recurrence[ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005, 61 (2) :450-455.
  • 9Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, et al. (2003) CTCAE v3.0: Development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment [ J ]. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2013,13 (3) :176-181.
  • 10Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline ( version 1. 1 ) [ J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009,45 (2) :228-247.

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部