期刊文献+

三种呼吸道病毒实验室检测方法比较 被引量:14

A comparison of three methods for detecting respiratory viruses
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的在3种呼吸道多病原检测方法中筛选出敏感的实验室检测方法。方法以73份上呼道感染病例咽拭子标本作为检测对象,利用3种呼吸道多病原病毒检测方法,对17种呼吸道病毒检测指标进行平行检测,根据不同呼吸道病毒检测指标检出率,评价3种试剂检测效果。结果自建RT—PCR及PCR检测方法共检出56个阳性指标,市售多重RT-PCR检测试剂盒共检出41个阳性指标,市售多重实时荧光RT-PCR检测试剂盒共检出87个阳性指标。结论多重实时荧光RT—PCR检测试剂盒具有更高的检出率,可用于呼吸道多病原病毒的实验室检测。 Objective To screen a sensitive method for detecting respiratory viruses from three different methods of singleplex conventional PCR, multiplex conventional PCR and multiplex real-time RT- PCR. Methods Parallel examination of 17 respiratory viruses was performed on 73 throat swab specimens collected from patients with upper respiratory tract infection by the three methods. The detection rates of dif- ferent respiratory viruses were used as evaluating indicator for the three methods. Results The numbers of respiratory viruses detected by singleplex conventional PCR, muhiplex conventional PCR and multiplex real- time PCR were 56, 41 and 87, respectively. Conclusion The multiplex real-time RT-PCR might be used for the detection of respiratory viruses in laboratory as its high detection rate in comparison with the other two methods.
出处 《中华微生物学和免疫学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期541-544,共4页 Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology
关键词 呼吸道病毒 普通PCR 多重RT-PCR 多重实时荧光RT-PCR Respiratory virus Conventional PCR Multiplex RT-PCR Multiplex real-time RT- PCR
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Templeton K?, Scheltinga SA, Beersma MF,et al. Rapid andsensitive method using multiplex real-time PCR for diagnosis of in-fections by influenza a and influenza B viruses, respiratory syncyti-al virus, and parainfluenza viruses 1,2,3,and 4. J Clin Micro-biol, 2004, 42(4) : 1564-1569.
  • 2Smyth RL, Openshaw PJ. Bronchiolitis. Lancet, 2006, 368(9532) : 312-322.
  • 3Klig JE, Chen L. Lower respiratory infections in children. CurrOpin Pediatr, 2003, 15(1) : 121-126.
  • 4Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R. Mandell, Douglas, and Ben-nettes principles and practice of infectious diseases, 7th ed. Phila-delphia ,PA: Elsevier-Churchill Living stone, 2009.
  • 5Deffrasnes C, Hamelin ME, Boivin G. Human metapneumovirus.Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 2007, 28(2) : 213-221.
  • 6Fouchier RA, Rimmelzwaan GF, Kuiken T, et al. Newer respira-tory vims infections : human metapneumovirus,avian influenza vi-rus, and human coronaviruses. Curr Opin Infect Dis, 2005, 18(2): 141-146.
  • 7Kahn JS. Newly discovered respiratory viruses: significance andimplications. Curr Opin Pharmacol, 2007 , 7(5 ) : 478-483.
  • 8Raymond F, Carbonneau J, Boucher N, et al. Comparison of au-tomated microarray detection with real-time PCR assays for detec-tion of respiratory viruses in specimens obtained from children. JClin Microbiol, 2009, 47(3) : 743-750.
  • 9Storch GA. Rapid diagnostic tests for influenza. Curr Opin Pedi-atr, 2003, 15(1): 77-84.
  • 10石晶,孔晓慧.PCR技术在呼吸道病毒检测中的应用进展[J].医学综述,2011,17(17):2683-2686. 被引量:14

二级参考文献7

共引文献13

同被引文献145

引证文献14

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部