期刊文献+

巨猿牙齿釉质厚度及对食性适应与系统演化的意义 被引量:4

Enamel Thickness of Gigantopithecus blacki and Its Significance for Dietary Adaptation and Phylogeny
下载PDF
导出
摘要 步氏巨猿(Gigantopithecus blacki)是更新世时期生活于我国华南地区的一种超大型猿类,它的体态特征和演化分类倍受关注。牙齿釉质厚度在探讨灵长类食性、环境适应以及系统演化方面具有重要意义。本文利用显微CT技术构建18颗巨猿臼齿虚拟模型,测量其釉质厚度。将巨猿釉质厚度与现代人、现生类人猿、古人类、中新世古猿及其他现生灵长类进行比较,从牙齿釉质厚度探讨巨猿的食性适应和系统演化问题。结果发现巨猿的实测釉质厚度是目前所有已知现生和化石灵长类中最厚的,只有傍人、南非早期人属及奥兰诺古猿三种化石灵长类与之接近;如果考虑不同物种牙齿与身体大小的关联因素,相对釉质厚度指数显示巨猿属于"厚"釉质类型,但非"超厚"类型,低于奥兰诺古猿、傍人、南非早期人属;巨猿与某些中新世古猿(如原康修尔猿尼安萨种、非洲古猿)、南方古猿、东非早期人属、亚洲直立人以及现代人、现生卷尾猴的相对釉质厚度指数相近。巨猿的厚釉质特征与其食性和环境适应密切相关,使得牙齿具有非常强的抗磨损功能,能够适应长时间的咀嚼和研磨食物。从釉质厚度的系统演化角度推测,厚釉质应该是人类祖先的特征性状,巨猿有可能是早期人类支系演化过程中的一个特化旁支,同时也不排除巨猿是从某种具有厚釉质的中新世古猿旁支平行演化而来的可能性。 Gigantopithecus blacki, a large Pleistocene hominoid from South China and Vietnam, is a very special taxon in any discussion of primate dietary proclivity and evolutionary phylogeny. In this study, 18 teeth of G. blacki, unworn or slightly-worn, are reconstructed using micro-CT in order to measure enamel thickness, and compared with extant and extinct humans and other primates. We find that, in absolute dimensions, G. bIacki has the thickest enamel thickness of any fossil or extant primates, while Paranthropus, early Homo and Ouranopithecus macedoniensis possess relatively closer values with it. With considerations of body and tooth size, the enamel measurements indicate that G. blacki belongs to a category of"thick-enamel" primate along with modern humans, Cebus, Australopithecus, East African Early Homo, Asian Homo erectus and some Miocene fossil apes (eg Proconsul nyanzae and Afropithecus turkanensis), but thinner than South African early Homo, Paranthropus and Ouranopithecus macedoniensis. The extremely thick enamel of G. blacki molars are evidently well used for grinding and crushing for a long period. The dietary proclivities may primarily focus on tough or fibrous vegetation. Human ancestors probably have thick enamel. G. blacki may be a side branch of hominids during the evolution. Meanwhile, G. blacki can be also evolved from one branch of Miocene fossil ape whose teeth enamel is thick. The thick enamel, common characteristic of G. blacki and human, is the result of parallel evolution.
出处 《人类学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期365-376,共12页 Acta Anthropologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(41072016) 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所"十二五"重点部署项目资助
关键词 步氏巨猿 釉质厚度 演化分析 食性适应 显微CT Gigantopithecus blacki Enamel thickness Phylogeny Functional adaptation Micro-CT
  • 相关文献

参考文献58

  • 1Von Koenigswald G. Eine fossile Saugetierfauna mit Simia aus Siidchina [J]. Proc Kon Nederl Akad Weten Ser C, 1935,38: 872-879.
  • 2Von Koenigswald G. Gigantopithecus blacki, a giant fossil hominoid from the Pleistocene of southern China [J]. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, 1952,43: 295-325.
  • 3裴文中 吴汝康.华南新发现的巨猿牙齿化石[J].古生物学报,1956,4(4):477-490.
  • 4张银运 吴茂霖 刘金荣.广西武鸣新发现的巨猿牙齿化石[J].科学通报,1973,18(3):130-133.
  • 5许春华 韩康信 王令红.鄂西巨猿化石及其共生的动物群[J].古脊椎动物与古人类,1974,12(4):293-309.
  • 6张银运 王令红 董兴仁 陈文俊.广西巴马发现的巨猿牙齿化石[J].古脊椎动物与古人类,1975,13(3):148-153.
  • 7赵凌霞,金昌柱,秦大公,潘文石.广西崇左三合大洞新发现的巨猿牙齿化石及其演化意义[J].第四纪研究,2008,28(6):1138-1144. 被引量:5
  • 8王頠,田丰,莫进尤.广西布兵盆地么会洞发现的巨猿牙齿化石[J].人类学学报,2007,26(4):329-343. 被引量:10
  • 9Wang W. New discoveries of Gigantopithecus blacki teeth from Chuifeng Cave in the Bubing Basin, Guangxi, south China [J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2009. 57(3): 229-240.
  • 10Zhao LX, Zhang LZ. New fossil evidence and diet analysis of Gigantopithecus blacki and its distribution and extinction in South China [J]. Quaternary International, 2013, 286: 69-74.

二级参考文献107

共引文献46

同被引文献80

  • 1顾玉珉,黄万波,宋方义,郭兴富,陈大远.两广部分地区猩猩化石的研究[J].人类学学报,1987,6(4):272-283. 被引量:7
  • 2原思训,陈铁梅,高世君.华南若干旧石器时代地点的铀系年代[J].人类学学报,1986,5(2):179-190. 被引量:61
  • 3LI MingQi,YANG XiaoYan,WANG Hui,WANG Qiang,JIA Xin,GE QuanSheng.Starch grains from dental calculus reveal ancient plant foodstuffs at Chenqimogou site, Gansu Province[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2010,53(5):694-699. 被引量:11
  • 4Gantt DO. Enamel of primate teeth: its structure with reference to functional and phyletic implication [D]. PhD. Dissertation, Washington University, St.Louis, 1977.
  • 5Warren KS, Verschoor E J, Langenhuijzen S, et al. Speciation and intrasubspecifie variation of Bornean orangutans, Pongopygmaeus pygmaeus[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2001, 18(4): 472-480.
  • 6Zhang Y, Ryder OA, Zhang Y. Genetic divergence of orangutan subspecies (Pongo pygmaeus) [J]. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 2001, 52(6): 516-526.
  • 7Locke DP, Hillier LW, Warren WC, et al. Comparative and demographic analysis of orang-utan genomes[J]. Nature, 2011, 469(7331): 529-533.
  • 8Groves CP, Westwood C, Shea BT. Unfinished business: Mahalanobis and a clockwork orang[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1992, 22:327-340.
  • 9Uchida A. Variation in tooth morphology of Pongopygmaeus[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1998, 34(1): 71-79.
  • 10Courtenay J, Groves C, Andrews P. Inter- or intra-island variation? An assessment of the differences between Bomean and Sumatran orang-utans[A]. In: Schwartz JH ed. Orang-utah Biology[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988:19-29.

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部