期刊文献+

探讨BI-RADS分级在超声诊断乳腺癌中的应用价值 被引量:35

The role of BI-RADS classification in ultrasonic diagnosis of breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨超声乳腺影像报告和数据系统对诊断乳腺癌的应用价值。方法:选择患乳腺疾病并将行外科手术患者71例,应用高频彩色多普勒对双侧乳房进行扫查。根据BI-RADS对乳腺病灶进行分级,选择BI-RADS 3~5级的患者61例(78个病灶),将乳腺BI-RADS分级情况和病理切片结果进行比较和分析,评估BI-RADS分级对于鉴别乳腺癌的效能。结果:在61例患者(78个病灶)中,病理学活检结果显示:24个BI-RADS 3级的病灶中,良性20个(83.33%),恶性4个(16.67%);29个BI-RADS 4级的病灶中,良性3个(10.34%),恶性26个(89.66%);25个BI-RADS 5级的病灶中,良性0个(0),恶性25个(100%)。BI-RADS分级诊断乳腺癌的敏感度和特异度分别为92.73%、86.96%。BI-RADS 3~5级病灶在病变边缘、边界、回声、周围组织、钙化、血管分布、血流RI值间的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:BI-RADS分级诊断乳腺癌的敏感性和特异性较高。在高频彩色多普勒超声检查乳腺中,应用BI-RADS分级对于诊断乳腺癌和指导治疗方案具有重要的临床意义。 Objective: To study the role of BI-RADS classification(Breast imaging reporting and data system) in ultrasonic diagnosis of breast cancer.Methods: A total of 71 patients with breast diseases who would undergo surgery were selected for study.All the patients underwent bilateral breast examination with high-frequency color Doppler ultrasonography.According to BI-RADS classification,61 patients(78 breast lesions) with BI-RADS grade 3~5 were recruited.The diagnostic characteristics of high-frequency color Doppler ultrasonography about breast lesions with different BI-RADS were compared with the histopathological diagnosis.Then the efficacy of BI-RADS classification for the identification of breast cancer was assessed.Results: In all the 61 patients(78 breast lesions),confirmed by histopathology,24 were BI-RADS grade 3,in which 20(83.33%) were benign,4(16.67%) were malignant.Twenty-nine breast lesions were BI-RADS grade 4,and histopathology confirmed 3(10.34%) were benign,26(89.66%) were malignant.Twenty-five lesions were BI-RADS grade 5,and all the lesions were malignant confirmed with histopathology(100%).Sensitivity and specificity were 92.73% and 86.96% respectively in the diagnosis of breast cancer by BI-RADS classification.Statistical difference was found in BI-RADS grade 3,4,5 in margin,lesion boundary,acoustic feature,the changes of surrounding tissue,calcification in mass,vascularity in lesion blood flow and resistance index(RI).Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of the BI-RADS classification were high in diagnosing breast cancer.It has important clinical significance for high-frequency color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast cancer and treatment planning.
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 CAS 2013年第7期465-468,共4页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 超声检查 乳房 Breast neoplasms Ultrasonography mammary
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Tirmners JM, van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, Zonderland HM, et al. The breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme: its role as an assessment and stratification tool [J]. Eur Radiol, 2012, 22(8): 1717-1723.
  • 2Calas M J, Almeida RM, Gutfilen B, et al. Interobserver concordance in the BI-RADS classification of breast ultrasound exams[J]. Clinies(Sao Panlo), 2012, 67(2): 185-189.
  • 3Taylor K, Britton P, O'Keeffe S, et al. Quantification of the UK 5-point breast imaging classification and mapping to BI-RADS to facilitate comparison with international literature [J]. Br J Radiol. 2011, 84(1007): 1005-1010.
  • 4Hille H, Vetter M, Hackeler BJ. The accuracy of BI-RADS classification of breast ultrasound as a first-line imaging method [J]. Uhraschall Med, 2012, 33(2): 160-163.
  • 5Sohns C, Scherrer M, Staab W, et al. Value of the BI-RADS classification in MR-mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors[J]. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(12): 2475-2483.
  • 6Raza S, Goldkamp AL, Chikannane SA, et al. US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management [J]. Radiographics, 2010, 30(5): 1199-1213.
  • 7Kennedy G, Markert M, Alexander JR, et al. Predictive value of BI-RADS classification for breast imaging in women under age 50[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2011, 130(3): 819-823.
  • 8Dzono-Boban A, Mratovi MC, Masanovi M. Analysis of the results of mammography screening in Dubrovnik-Neretva County in the 2006-2009 period [J]. Acta Med Croatica, 2010, 64(5): 453-459.
  • 9Prosch H, Halbwachs C, Strobl C, et al. Automated breast ultrasound vs. handheld ultrasound: BI -RADS classification, duration of the examination and patient comfort [J]. Uhraschall Med, 2011, 32(5): 504-510.
  • 10Baum JK, Hanna LG, Acharyya S, et al. Use of BI-RADS 3- probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial [J]. Radiology, 2011, 260(1): 61-67.

同被引文献240

引证文献35

二级引证文献212

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部