期刊文献+

双源CT Flash大螺距技术对主动脉成像的辐射剂量及升主动脉图像质量的研究 被引量:10

Study of radiation dose and image quality of aorta at dual-source Flash Spiral CT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨双源CT Flash大螺距扫描模式对主动脉的辐射剂量和升主动脉的图像质量优势。方法:将110例行主动脉CTA检查的患者随机分为A、B两组各55例,分别行传统扫描与Flash大螺距扫描,两组分别检出主动脉夹层患者45例、48例。对两种扫描模式下的主动脉辐射剂量和升主动脉图像质量进行对比评价。结果:两组患者的年龄、体重指数差异无统计学意义。两组的升主动脉图像质量评分差异有统计学意义,分别为2.1±0.7(A组)和1.4±0.6(B组)(t=5.2,P<0.05)。B组采用Flash Spiral扫描模式的辐射剂量为(2.7±0.6)mSv,低于传统扫描模式的(3.9±0.9)mSv,两组差异具有统计学意义(t=2.1,P<0.05)。结论:双源CT主动脉Flash大螺距扫描模式可以较低辐射剂量获得清晰的升主动脉图像,具有较高的临床应用价值。 Objective: To evaluate the application of dual-source Flash Spiral CT in aortography,and compare it’s image quality and radiation dose with traditional scanning mode.Methods: 110 patients suspected or known aortic dissection were divided into two groups.Group A underwent traditional scan mode and Group B underwent Flash Spiral scan mode.Both the image quality and radiation dose of the two groups were compared.Results: There was no significant difference in age and body mass index of the two groups.The average image quality score was 2.1±0.7 in group A and 1.4±0.6 in group B,with significant difference(t=5.2,P0.05).The mean radiation dose of group B was lower than that of group A((2.7±0.6) mSv,(3.9± 0.9) mSv;t=2.1,P0.05).Conclusion: Dual-source Flash Spiral CT scanning with low radiation dose and good image quality in demonstrating aortic dissection with high clinical application value.
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 CAS 2013年第7期472-475,共4页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
基金 2011年第四军医大学西京医院学科助推计划临床高新技术项目(基金编号XJZT10Y26 2011.1-2012.12)
关键词 主动脉疾病 体层摄影术 螺旋计算机 Aortic diseases Tomography spiral computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1郑敏文,赵宏亮,徐健,葛雅丽,石明国,彭勇,张劲松,宦怡.16层螺旋CT主动脉低剂量扫描研究[J].中华医学杂志,2008,88(21):1462-1466. 被引量:4
  • 2Fujioka C, Horiguchi J, Kiguchi M, et al. Survey of aorta and coronary arteries with prospective ECG-triggered 100 kV 64-MD- CT angiography[J]. AJR, 2009, 193(1): 227-233.
  • 3耿冀,俞婧,范占明,李宇,辛海燕,张楠,徐磊,张兆琪,孙立忠,朱俊明.双源CT血管造影综合评估Stanford A型主动脉夹层[J].中国医学影像技术,2011,27(10):2053-2057. 被引量:8
  • 4Smith AD, Schoenhagen P. CT imaging for acute aortic syndrome [J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2008, 75(1): 7-9; 12; 15-17.
  • 5Roos JE, Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, et al. Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and propective electrocardiography-assisted multi-detector row CT [J]. Radiology, 2002, 222(1): 271-277.
  • 6Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2008, 24(5): 535-546.
  • 7Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults[J]. Radiology, 2009, 251(1): 175- 184.
  • 8Bongartz G, Golding S, Jurik A, et al. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. Funded by the European Commission. Contract number FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP. March 2004.
  • 9薛跃君,钱农,邵燕惠,潘昌杰,荣伟良,许轶群,陶志伟.自然心率下128层双源Flash Spiral CT冠状动脉成像质量及辐射剂量的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2011,45(5):481-485. 被引量:33
  • 10Goetti R, Baumuller S, Fcuchtner G, et al. High-pith dual- source CT angiography of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: is simuhancous coronary arfery assessment possible [J]. AJR, 2010, 194(4): 938-944.

二级参考文献51

  • 1吴晓华,马大庆,张忠嘉,冀景玲,张岩松.多层螺旋CT胸部低剂量扫描发现肺结节的临床研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(7):767-770. 被引量:86
  • 2张森,杜湘珂,李剑颖.心电图调制电流对于容积CT心脏扫描图像质量及曝光剂量影响的评估[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(9):974-976. 被引量:45
  • 3Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, et al. Estimated risks of radiationinduced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2001,176: 289-296.
  • 4Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet, 2004, 363 : 345-351.
  • 5Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with fifll-body CT screening. Radiology, 2004, 232 : 735-738.
  • 6Mayo JR, Hartman TE, Lee KS, et aL CT of the chest: minimal tube current required for good image quality with the least radiation dose. AIR Am J Roentgenol ,1995, 164:603-607.
  • 7Prasad SR, Wittram C, Shepard JA, et al. Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2002,179:461-465.
  • 8Ravenel JG, Scalzetti EM, Huda W, et al. Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 2001, 177:279-284.
  • 9Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P, et aL Aortoiliac mulfidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15:334-341.
  • 10Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, et al. Lower tube voltage reduces contrast material and radiation doses on 16-MDCT aortography. AIR Am J Roentgenol,2006, 187:W490-497.

共引文献83

同被引文献91

引证文献10

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部