期刊文献+

淅川县生态服务价值估算及动态变化分析 被引量:4

Estimation and Dynamic Variation Analysis of Ecosystem Service Values in Xichuan County
下载PDF
导出
摘要 淅川县是南水北调中线工程渠首所在地,其区域经济发展和生态环境变化受到调水工程的影响,同时也对中线调水的水质有影响。基于1995年、2000年、2005年和2008年的土地利用/覆盖变化数据,估算了淅川县4个时期的生态系统服务价值并分析了其动态变化特征。结果表明:近20年来,淅川县生态服务价值最高为1995年的338 251×104元,由于受人类活动的影响,从1995年-2008年淅川县生态服务价值整体来讲减少了34 837×104元,其中农田和水域面积的减少是主要原因。林地、农田和水域产生的生态服务价值之和超过总价值的90%,并且水源涵养、废物处理和生物多样性保护分列生态服务功能的前三位,其价值之和接近总价值的50%。以调水工程未实施的2000年为界,淅川县生态服务价值1995年-2000年减少了73 650×104元。随着南水北调中线工程水源地生态环境建设的逐渐开展,2000年-2008年服务价值开始增加,2008年达到了303 413×104元,生态环境得到改善。2000年以来,淅川县生态服务价值与GDP的比值不断减小,也说明淅川县在生态环境保护的同时经济仍在不断发展。 Xichuan County is located at the headwork of the Middle Route of South-to-North Water Diversion ProJect, thus Its re- gional economic development and ecological environmental change are affected by the project, and it can also affect the water quality of the project. In this paper, based on the land use/cover maps of year 1995,2000,2005, and 2008, the ecosystem service values and their dynamic variation characteristics of Xichuan County were calculated and analyzed for the four years. The results indicated that the highest ecosystem service value of Xiehuan County was 3382.51 million RMB in 1995. Due to the effects of human activities,the ecosystem service value of Xichuan County had lost 348. 37 million RMB from 1995 to 2008, and the de- creasing of cultivated land and water body was the main reasorL The ecosystem service values of woodland, cultivated land, and water body accounted for 90 ~//0 of the total value. The water conservation, waste treatment, and hio-diversity protection were the top three ecological functions and their ecosystem service values accounted for 50% of the total value. The ecosystem service value of Xichuan County lost 736.50 million RMB from 1995 to 2000. With the gradual implementation of the ecological envi ronment construction of the Middle Route of South-to-North Water Diversion Project, the ecosystem service value of Xichuan County began to increase from 2000 and 2008 and reached 3034. 13 million RMB in 2008. Moreover, the ratio of ecosystem serv- ice value to GDP has decreased since 2000, which indicated the existence of ecological environment protection and economic de- velopment in Xichuan County.
出处 《南水北调与水利科技》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期140-144,210,共6页 South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"基于NDVI的流域产流产沙对LUCC响应的快速预测及尺度效应"(50979003)
关键词 生态服务价值 土地利用 南水北调中线工程 淅川县 ecosystem service value land use Middle Route of South-to-North Water Diversion Project~ Xichuan County
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献132

共引文献5598

同被引文献74

  • 1张伟东,王雪峰.辽宁省生态功能区划研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2007,28(2):58-62. 被引量:22
  • 2PO MES D’ ANTAN[J].法语学习,2001(3):49-51. 被引量:12
  • 3李昭阳,汤洁,孙平安,林年丰.松嫩平原西南部土地利用动态变化的分形研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006,36(2):250-258. 被引量:24
  • 4赵军,杨凯.生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].生态学报,2007,27(1):346-356. 被引量:225
  • 5徐广才,康慕谊,赵从举,赵文武,秦艳红.阜康市生态敏感性评价研究[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,43(1):88-92. 被引量:75
  • 6Bian Z F, Lu Q Q. 2013. Ecological effects analysis of land use change in coal mining area based on ecosystem service valuing: a case study in Jiawang[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 68(6) : 1619-1630.
  • 7Constanza R. 1998. Introduction special section: Forum on valuation of ecosystem services the value of the ecosystem services [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 25(2) : 1-2.
  • 8Costanza R, D'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [ J ]. Nature, 387 (6630) 253-260.
  • 9Kreuter U P, Harris H G, Matlock M D, et al. 2001. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 39(3) : 333-346.
  • 10Lambin E F, Baulies X, Bockstael N, et al. 1999. Land-use and land- cover change (LUCC) : implementation strategy [ R]. IGBP Report No. 48 and IHDP Report No. 10. Stockholm: IGBP.

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部