摘要
海外中国人大制度研究形成了以制度范式和权力范式为代表的两种研究范式。制度范式关注的是人大的制度建设以及人大代表、选民等制度行动者对制度建设的能动作用,而权力范式关注的是人大的权力变化对人大与其他机构的关系的影响。合作模式、制衡模式、磨合模式、网络模式和垃圾桶模式是权力范式下的五种主要模型。在研究趋势上,海外人大制度研究经历了从制度范式向权力范式的转换,这种研究范式的转换与中国人大角色的变化密切相关。
The overseas study of the People's Congress has formed the institutional paradigm and power paradigm. The institutional paradigm focuses on the PC' institutionalization and the role of the institutional actors, while the power paradigm focuses on how the change of the PC' power influences the relationship between the CPC and the other's powerful institutions. Under the power paradigm, it has developed the Cooperation Model, the Check and Balance Model, the "Mohe" (run-in) Model, the Network Model and the Garbage Can Model. In the tendency of the PC' overseas study, it has experienced the paradigm transition, which is from institutional paradigm to power paradigm. The role's change of the CPC may account to this tendency.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第8期26-36,共11页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“扩大公民有序政治参与:战略、路径与对策”(项目编号:12&ZD040)的阶段性成果
关键词
制度范式
权力范式
中国人大制度
海外视角
The Institutional Paradigm
the Overseas Perspective Power Paradigm
People's Congresses of China