期刊文献+

人格判断的准确性:特质特性的作用 被引量:9

The Accuracy of Personality Judgment: The Effects of Trait Properties
下载PDF
导出
摘要 特质特性是影响人格判断准确性的重要调节变量。已有的研究表明,可观察性高的特质容易判断,判断的准确性和一致性也更高;特质的可评估性干扰了自我知觉的准确性,与中性特质相比,可评估性特质的自我—他人一致性更低;与清晰特质相比,模糊特质的自我—同伴判断间的一致性更低,且随特质模糊性的增加而递减。不仅如此,特质特性经常与其他因素如熟悉度交互作用于人格判断的准确性,在考查特质特性的作用时,必须提高研究的生态效度,将该变量与特性匹配、特质分类、个体差异及文化差异等因素综合起来考虑。 The properties of traits are important moderator variables which influence the accuracy of personality judgment. The previous researches have showed that the higher observability the traits are, the easier be judged, and the higher accuracy and agreement they have. The evaluativeness of traits interfere the accuracy of self-perception. Comparing with the neutral traits, the self-other agreement of evaluativeness traits is lower; Comparing with unambiguous traits, the self-peer inter-judgment agreement is lower in ambiguous traits, and this is reducing with the increasing of traits ambiguous gradually. Furthermore, the properties of traits often interact on the accuracy of personality judgment with other factors, such as acquaintanceship. When examining the effects of traits properties on the personality judgment accuracy, we must take the ecological validity of experimental research into account, as well as integrate it with the matching of trait properties, types and contents of traits, the individual differences, and the cultural differences and so on.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期1441-1449,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 广州市哲学社会科学规划课题(2012GJ42)
关键词 人格判断 准确性 可观察性 可评估性 模糊性 personality judgment accuracy observability evaluativeness ambiguity
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1陈少华.人格分化的智力假设[J].心理学探新,2008,28(1):77-81. 被引量:4
  • 2陈少华,赖庭红,吴颢.关系质量对人格判断的影响及其对教育的启示[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2012,34(2):55-59. 被引量:7
  • 3黄希庭,张蜀林.562个人格特质形容词的好恶度、意义度和熟悉度的测定[J].心理科学,1992,15(5):17-22. 被引量:54
  • 4Funder,D.C.(2009).久移谜题(第4版,许燕等译,pp.127-143).北京:世界图书出版公司.
  • 5Larsen,R.J.,&Buss,D.M.(2011).人格心理学:人性的科学探索(第2版,郭永玉等译,pp.56-85).北京:人民邮电出版社.
  • 6Myers,G.(2012).我们是自己的陌生人(沈德灿译,pp.100-132).北京:人民邮电出版社.
  • 7Allik, J., Realo, A., Mottus, R., Borkenau, P., Kuppens, P., & Hi'ebickova, M (2010a). How people see others is different from how people see themselves: A replicable pattern across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 870-882.
  • 8Allik, J., Realo, A., MiSttus, R., Esko, T., Pullat, J., & Metspalu, A. (2010b). Variance determines self-observer agreement on the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 421-426.
  • 9Allik, J., Realo, A., M6ttus, R., & Kuppens, P. (2010c). Generalizability of self-other agreement from one personality trait to another. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 128-132.
  • 10Allport, G. W. (1925). Social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Riverside.

二级参考文献44

  • 1陈少华,曾毅.人格与智力:一种交互作用的模型[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(1):87-92. 被引量:4
  • 2陈少华,曾毅.整合人格与智力:个体差异研究的新思路[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(3):125-128. 被引量:2
  • 3FUNDER D C,KOLAR D C,BLACKMAN M C.Agreementamong judges of personality:Interpersonal relations,similarity,and acquaintanceship[J].Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology,1995,69:656–672.
  • 4BEER A,BROOKS C.Information quality in personalityjudgment:The value of personal disclosure[J].Journal ofResearch in Personality,2011,45:175–185.
  • 5VAZIRE S.Who knows what about a person?The self–otherknowledge asymmetry(SOKA)model[J].Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology,2010,98:281–300.
  • 6WATSON D,HUBBARD B,WIESE D.Self-other agreementin personality and affectivity:The role of acquaintanceship,trait visibility,and assumed similarity[J].Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology,2000,78:546–558.
  • 7LETZRING T D,WELLS S M,FUNDER D C.Informationquantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personalityjudgment[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006,91:111–123.
  • 8FUNDER D C,COLVIN C R.Friends and strangers:Acquaintanceship,agreement,and the accuracy of personalityjudgment[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1988,55:149–158.
  • 9BORKENAU P,LIEBLER A.Convergence of stranger ratingsof personality and intelligence with self-ratings,partnerratings,and measured intelligence[J].Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology,1993,65:546–553.
  • 10FUNDER D C.On the accuracy of personality judgment:arealistic approach[J].Psychological Review,1995,102:652–670.

共引文献60

同被引文献90

  • 1任国华,刘继亮.大五人格和工作绩效相关性研究的进展[J].心理科学,2005,28(2):406-408. 被引量:40
  • 2王登峰,崔红.行为的跨情境一致性及人格与行为的关系——对人格内涵及其中西方差异的理论与实证分析[J].心理学报,2006,38(4):543-552. 被引量:60
  • 3王彬,李宝花,胡峻梅.累犯人格障碍的相关研究[J].精神医学杂志,2007,20(2):81-83. 被引量:3
  • 4Aronson,E.,Wilson,T.D.,&Akert,R.M.(2012).社会心理学(第7版).侯玉波等译.北京:世界图书出版公司,100-133.
  • 5Funder,D.(2009).人格谜题(第4版).许燕等译.北京:世界图书出版公司,132-147.
  • 6Ames, D. R. (200g). Strategies for social inference : A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prev- alence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 573 -585.
  • 7Anderson, S. M. (1984). Self-knowledge and social inference: II. The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46,294 -307.
  • 8Beer, A. , & Brooks, C. (2011). Information quality in personality judgment: The value of personal disclosure. Journal of Re- search in Personality, 45, 175 -185.
  • 9Beer, A. , & Watson, D. (2008). Asymmetry in judgments of personality: Others are less differentiated than the self. Journal of Personality, 76, 535 -560.
  • 10Beer, A. , & Watson, D. (2010). The effects of information and exposure on self-other agreement. Journal Research in Personality, 44, 38 -45.

引证文献9

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部