期刊文献+

微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术组织创伤相关血清指标的比较研究 被引量:14

COMPARISON OF TRAUMATIC RELATED INDEX IN SERUM BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR TISSUE INJURY
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,TLIF)与开放TLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病组织创伤相关血清指标差异,分析其意义。方法将2012年5月-11月符合选择标准的60例患者纳入研究,根据患者对手术方式认同度、经济条件等情况确定手术方式,行Quadrant可扩张工作通道下经椎间孔椎管减压、椎间植骨融合、Sextant椎弓根螺钉内固定手术(微创组)及传统开放TLIF手术(开放组)各30例。两组患者性别、年龄、病变类型、病变节段、病程等一般资料比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。分别记录患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间等;应用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估患者术后切口疼痛程度。检测两组患者术前及术后24 hC反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)浓度及肌酸激酶(creatine kinase,CK)活性;以及术前和术后2、4、8、24 h患者血清中IL-6、IL-10及TNF-α的浓度。结果微创组手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间及术后1~3 d切口VAS评分均少于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术前血清CRP浓度、CK活性、IL-6、IL-10及TNF-α浓度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后24 h,微创组CRP浓度、CK活性及术后各时间点IL-6、IL-10浓度均低于开放组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组TNF-α浓度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论微创TLIF导致的组织创伤及系统炎性反应较开放TLIF轻,对患者造成的手术创伤较小。 Objective To compare the difference of traumatic related index in serum and its significance between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF) and open TLIF. Methods Sixty patients were enrolled by the entry criteria between May and November 2012,and were divided into MIS-TLIF group(n=30) and open TLIF group(n=30).There was no significant difference in gender,age,type of lesions,disease segment,and disease duration between 2 groups(P 0.05).The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and postoperative hospitalization time were recorded,and the pain severity of incision was evaluated by visual analog scale(VAS).The serum levels of C-reactive protein(CRP) and creatine kinase(CK) were measured at preoperation and at 24 hours postoperatively.The levels of interleukin 6(IL-6),IL-10,and tumor necrosis factor α(TNF-α) in serum were measured at preoperation and at 2,4,8,and 24 hours after operation. Results The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and postoperative hospitalization time of MIS-TLIF group were significantly smaller than those of open TLIF group(P 0.05),and the VAS score for incision pain in MIS-TLIF group was significantly lower than that of open TLIF group at 1,2,and 3 days after operation(P 0.05).The levels of CRP,CK,IL-6,and IL-10 in MIS-TLIF group were significantly lower than those in open TLIF group at 24 hours after operation(P 0.05),but there was no significant difference between 2 groups before operation(P 0.05).No significant difference was found in TNF-α level between 2 groups at pre-and post-operation(P 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the open-TLIF,MIS-TLIF may significantly reduce tissue injury and systemic inflammatory reactions during the early postoperative period.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期960-964,共5页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 组织创伤 炎性反应 经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术 微创手术 开放手术 腰椎退行性疾病 Tissue injury Inflammatory reaction Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Minimally invasive surgery Open surgery Lumbar degenerative disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Cutler AR, Siddiqui S, Mohan AL, et al. Comparison of polyetherether- ketone cage with emoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece inter- body spacer in tranaforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. ! Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 5(6): 534-539.
  • 2Lowe TG, Tahernia AD, O'Brien MF, et al. Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2 year results. ] Spinal Disord Tech, 2002, 15(1): 31-38.
  • 3李兵,胡朝晖,卓祥龙.经椎间孔椎体间融合治疗退行性腰椎间盘病[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2008,22(8):914-917. 被引量:6
  • 4Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, et al. Minimally invasive mi- croendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine, 2005, 3(2): 98-105.
  • 5Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, et al. Minimally invasive trmas-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18 Suppl 1: S1-6.
  • 6Seheufler KM, Dohmen H, Vougioukas VI. Percutaneous transforami- nal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery, 2007, 60(4 Suppl 2): 203-213.
  • 7Thelander U, Larsson S. Quantitation of C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1997, 17(i): 400-404.
  • 8Takahashi J, Ebara S, Kamimura M, et al. Early-phase enhanced in- flammatory reaction after spinal in-strumentation surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26(15): 1698-1704.
  • 9Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H, et al. Back muscle injury after poste- rior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996, 21(8): 941-944.
  • 10Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back musde injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evlanation of intramuscular pres- sure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996, 21(22): 2683-2688.

二级参考文献60

  • 1杨维权,刘大雄,郑和平,王魁,郑朝晖,孙荣华.腰椎间盘突出症后路微创手术的应用解剖学研究[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2004,19(9):588-589. 被引量:21
  • 2彭宝淦,孙金烈,王晓宁,张健,李振宙,吴闻文,侯树勋.腰椎间盘造影一致性疼痛反应和纤维环破裂程度的相关性研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(3):190-192. 被引量:29
  • 3郝定均,刘团江,吴起宁,周劲松,贺宝荣.腰椎间盘造影在椎间盘源性腰痛诊治中的应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(21):1647-1649. 被引量:11
  • 4王锡阳,胡朝晖,胡建中,李康华,张宏其.椎间盘源性腰痛的手术治疗[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2006,31(4):607-609. 被引量:9
  • 5郭钧,陈仲强,郭昭庆,齐强,杨民.椎间盘源性腰痛的临床特点与治疗[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(3):177-181. 被引量:36
  • 6Kotil K, Tunckale T, Tatar Z, et al. Serum creatine phosphokinase ac- tivity and histological changes in the multifidus muscle: a prospective randomized controlled comparative study of discectomy with or with- out retraction. 1 Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 6(2): 121-125.
  • 7Kim CW. Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery: preven- tion of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(26 Suppl): S281-286.
  • 8Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, et al. The quantitative analysis of tissue in- jury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(6): 712-716.
  • 9Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong Z, et al. Minimally invasive transforami- nal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(17): 1615-1620.
  • 10Fan S, Hu Z, Zhao F, et al. Multifidus musde changes and clinical ef- fects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally inva- sive procedure versus conventional open approach. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(2): 316-324.

共引文献76

同被引文献122

引证文献14

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部