期刊文献+

海马电刺激对耐药性颞叶癫痫大鼠CA1区神经元钠通道电流的影响 被引量:4

Effect of hippocampal electrical stimulation on the sodium channel current in CA~ region neurons in rats with pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立多药耐药性颞叶癫痫模型,以海马CA,区锥体细胞钠通道电流的变化为观察指标,探讨海马电刺激治疗耐药性颞叶癫痫的可能机制。方法选用Wistar大鼠80只制作慢性杏仁核点燃癫痫模型,制作成功后用经典抗癫痫药苯妥英钠和苯巴比妥进行筛选,根据癫痫大鼠对药物的反应区别出耐药癫痫大鼠及药物敏感大鼠,将筛选出的耐药性癫痫大鼠分为海马刺激组(n=6)及耐药对照组(n=6),用膜片钳全细胞记录模式观察海马电刺激后脑细胞钠通道电流的变化。结果进行海马电刺激2周后,刺激杏仁核诱发的癫痫发作明显减轻,海马刺激组与耐药对照组Racine分级分别为(2.32±0.38)级和(4.45±0.42)级,差异具有统计学意义(t=84.600,P=0.000),后放电各项参数也明显改善,膜片钳全细胞记录结果表明,海马刺激组钠通道电流峰值及激活曲线向去极化方向偏移,失活曲线向超极化方向偏移,海马刺激组钠通道失活后恢复时间[(17.94-0.6)S]较耐药对照组[(16.3±0.3)S]明显延长(t=-25.420,P=0.000)。结论海马电刺激可以抑制钠通道电流,其治疗耐药性癫痫的作用可能是通过抑制钠通道电流而降低脑细胞兴奋性,从而减少癫痫性电活动的产生而实现的。 Objective To establish a muhi-drug resistant model of temporal lobe epilepsy, and then the sodium current of pyramidal neurons in CA areas of the hippocampus was used as as index to observe the effect of hippocampal stimulation on pharmacoresistant epileptic rats. Methods Eighty Wistar rats were selected to prepare an amygdaloid kindled model of epilepsy by chronic stimulation of amygaloid basal lateral nucleus. When the kindled model of epilepsy was prepared successfully, the pharmacoresistant epileptic rats were selected according their response to phenobabital and phenytoin. The selected pharmacoresistant epileptic rats were divided into a hippocampal stimulation group (HS group) and a pharmacoresistant control group (PR group). A low-frequency hippocampal stimulation was performed in the HS group, while the PR group received sham stimulation. The whole-cell recording technique by patch-clamp was used to observe the changes of sodium current of hippocampal pyramidal neurons after the hippocampal stimulation. Results Compared with the PR group, the pharmacoresistant epileptic rats in HS group underwent low-frequency stimulation for 2 weeks showed that the amygdale stimulus-induced seizures were decreased (2. 32 ± 0. 38 in HS group and 4.45 ± 0. 42 in PR group, t = 84. 600, P = 0. 000) and the parameters of the after-discharges were improved significantly. In HS group, the peak current shifted towards depolarization, the sodium channels were difficult to activate, and were more susceptible to inactivation. Moreover, the recovery time after the sodium channel inactivation was slower in HS group ( ( 17.9±0. 6) s) than in PR group( ( 16. 3 ±0. 3 ) s, t = - 25. 420,P = 0. 000). Conclusions Hippocampal stimulation may inhibit the sodium channel current of pyramidal neurons in CA1 areas of hippocampus. The mechanism of hippocampal stimulation in the treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy might he achieved partly by inhibiting the sodium channel current so as to decrease the excitability of hippocampal neurons.
出处 《中华神经科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期513-518,共6页 Chinese Journal of Neurology
基金 基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81241129/H0913) 贵州省优秀教育科技人才省长专项资金资助项目(1065-09)
关键词 癫痫 颞叶 海马 电刺激 钠通道 抗药性 多药 点燃效应 神经病学 疾病模型 动物 Epilepsy, temporal lobe Hippocampus Electric stimulation Sodium channels Drug resistance, multiple Kindling, neurologic Disease models, animal
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1王跃峰,朴月善,卢德宏,王玮,陈莉,隗立峰,杨虹.难治性癫痫46例患者大脑半球或多脑叶切除标本的临床病理学分析[J].中华神经科杂志,2011,44(1):24-29. 被引量:11
  • 2张曼曼,丁美萍.脑深部电刺激治疗难治性癫痫研究进展[J].中华神经科杂志,2010,43(11):805-806. 被引量:1
  • 3韩燕飞,王玉平.难治性癫癎的脑部电刺激治疗[J].中华神经科杂志,2008,41(1):56-58. 被引量:3
  • 4Scoville WB, Milner B. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. 1957. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2000,12 : 103-113.
  • 5Weiss SR, Eidsath A, Li XL, et al. Quenching revisited: low level direct current inhibits amygdala-kindled seizures. Exp Neurol, 1998,154 : 185-192.
  • 6Wyckhuys T, De Smedt T, Claeys P, et al. High frequency deep brain stimulation in the hippocampus modifies seizure characteristics in kindled rats. Epilepsia ,2007 ,48 :1543-1550.
  • 7Wyckhuys T, Raedt R, Vonck K, et al. Comparison of hippocampal deep brain stimulation with high (130 Hz) and low frequency (5 Hz) on afterdischarges in kindled rats. Epilepsy Res, 2010,88:239-246.
  • 8Freeman FG, Jarvis MF. The effect of interstimulation interval on the assessment and stability of kindled seizure thresholds. Brain Res Bull,1981,7:629-633.
  • 9Racine RJ. Modification of seizure activity by electrical stimulation. I . After-discharge threshold. Electroeneephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1972,32:269-279.
  • 10Brandt C, Bethmann K, Gastens AM, et al. The multidrug transporter hypothesis of drug resistance in epilepsy: proof-of- principle in a rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurobiol Dis, 2006,24:202-211.

二级参考文献64

  • 1遇涛,李勇杰,王玉平,张国君,卢德宏,陈莉,蔡立新,杜薇.皮质发育不良导致的难治性部分性癫癎临床特征分析[J].中华神经科杂志,2006,39(3):148-151. 被引量:19
  • 2杨志仙,秦炯,常杏芝,包新华,张月华,刘晓燕,姜玉武,杨艳玲.偏侧惊厥-偏瘫和偏侧惊厥-偏瘫-癫综合征11例临床分析[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2006,21(7):522-525. 被引量:12
  • 3卢德宏,陈莉,朴月善.重视难治性癫痫的神经病理学研究[J].中华病理学杂志,2007,36(3):147-149. 被引量:35
  • 4朴月善,陈莉,付永娟,王玮,李勇杰,卢德宏.癫痫相关局灶性皮质发育不良的临床病理学研究[J].中华病理学杂志,2007,36(3):150-154. 被引量:40
  • 5Brodie MJ, Dichter MA. Established antiepileptic drugs. Seizure, 1997, 6: 159-174.
  • 6Penry JK, Dean JC. Prevention of intractable partial seizures by intermittent vagal stimulation in humans: preliminary results. Epilepsia, 1990, 31: 40-43.
  • 7A randomized controlled trial of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of medically intractable seizures. The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. Neurology, 1995, 45 : 224-230.
  • 8Cooper IS. Effect of chronic stimulation of anterior cerebellum on neurological disease. Lancet, 1973, 1 : 206.
  • 9Davis R, Emmonds SE. Cerebellar stimulation for seizure control: 17-year study. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 1992, 58: 200-208.
  • 10Velasco F, Carrillo-Ruiz JD, Brito F, et al. Double-blind, randomized controlled pilot study of bilateral cerebellar stimulation for treatment of intractable motor seizures. Epilepsia, 2005, 46: 1071-1081.

共引文献12

同被引文献64

  • 1向赟,许晓莉,董大翠,刘庆莹,朱长庚,雷皓.癫痫大鼠海马IL-1β变化的研究[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2004,25(6):630-633. 被引量:2
  • 2童武华,曹伟中,王黎恩,张继松,王海波,殳儆,陆佩文,施云超.控制性高血压对创伤性重症颅脑损伤神经预后的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2005,21(22):2513-2514. 被引量:10
  • 3张曙光,潘天鸿.颅脑损伤患者手术预后因素回归分析[J].中华神经医学杂志,2007,6(1):69-71. 被引量:8
  • 4Remy S, Beck H. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of pharmacoresistance in epilepsy. Brain, 2006 ( Pt 1 ), 129 : 18-35.
  • 5Jeub M, Beck H, Siep E, et al. Effect of phenytoin on sodium and calcium currents in hippocampal CA1 neurons of phenytoin- resistant kindled rats. Neuropharmacology, 2002, 42 : 107-116.
  • 6Duncan JS, Sander JW, Sisodiya SM, et al. Adult epilepsy. Lancet, 2006, 367 : 1087-1100.
  • 7Stables JP, Bertram E, Dudek FE, et al. Therapy discovery for pharmacoresistant epilepsy and for disease-modifying therapeutics: summary of the NIH/NINDS/AES models I] workshop. EDileDsia. 2003. 44:1472-1478.
  • 8Teichgraber LA, Lehmann TN, Meencke H J, et al. Impaired function of GABA (B) receptors in tissues from pharmacoresistant epilepsy patients. Epilepsia, 2009, 50 : 1697-1716.
  • 9Bethmann K, Fritschy JM, Brandt C, et al. Antiepileptic drug resistant rats differ from drug responsive rats in GABA A receptor subunit expression in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurobiol Dis, 2008, 31:169-187.
  • 10Jandovt K, Pasler D, Antonio LL, et al. Carbamazepine- resistance in the epileptic dentate gyrus of human hippocampal slices. Brain, 2006, 129 ( Pt 12) :3290-3306.

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部