期刊文献+

不同光照及采食条件对薇甘菊和鸡屎藤叶片形态可塑性的影响 被引量:4

Effects of Different Light and Herbivory Conditions on Leaf Morphological Plasticity of Mikania micrantha and Paederia scandens
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨薇甘菊在生物控制的情况下对不同光照环境的入侵能力,本研究比较了不同光照强度(相对光强100%,14.72%)和模拟采食(每片叶片剪掉50%的叶面积,不剪叶)条件下薇甘菊叶片形态可塑性的变化,并将其与本地形态相似的藤本植物鸡屎藤进行对比。结果表明:遮阴显著增加了薇甘菊和鸡屎藤的叶面积,而模拟采食降低了薇甘菊的叶片面积和重量,却没有降低鸡屎藤的叶片面积和重量。遮阴显著增加了薇甘菊和鸡屎藤的比叶面积,增幅达近一倍,说明薇甘菊和鸡屎藤对光照条件的变化都有较强的可塑性反应。模拟采食并没有降低薇甘菊和鸡屎藤的这种表型可塑性的表达。本研究表明,尽管引入天敌可降低薇甘菊的生长,但薇甘菊仍可能通过调节自身的叶片形态特征来维持其对不同光照环境的入侵能力。 To explore the i nvasi on potential of Mikania micrantha that is under biological control into environments with different levels of light availability,this study examined the effects of light availability(100% and 14.72% of full sunlight) and simulated herbivory(50% leaf area removal and no leaf area removal) on the leaf morphological plastic changes in M.micrantha and a comparative native species Paederia scandens.The results showed that shading significantly increased the leaf area of M.micrantha and P.scanden,and simulated herbivory decreased the leaf area and weight of M.micrantha but not those of P.scanden.Shading nearly doubled the specific leaf area of M.micrantha and P.scanden,indicating that M.micrantha and P.scanden are all plastic in response to light availability.Simulated herbivory did not reduce the expression of this plasticity.This study suggests that although natural enemy introduction could reduce the growth of M.micrantha,M.micrantha may remain its invasion potential into environments with diverse light levels through adjusting its leaf morphological traits.
出处 《热带农业科学》 2013年第7期11-16,共6页 Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(No.31071699) 公益性行业(农业)科研专项(No.201103027) 科技部国际合作项目(No.2011DFB30040) 中国热带农业科学院环境与植物保护研究所中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费(No.2012hzs1J007-1)
关键词 薇甘菊 鸡屎藤 光照 采食 叶片 可塑性 入侵 Mikania micrantha Paederia scandens light herbivory leaf plasticity invasion
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Huang Q Q,Wu J M, Bai Y Y, et al. Identifying themost noxious invasive plants in China: role of ge-ographical origin, life form and means of intro-duction [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2009,18(2): 305-316.
  • 2Van Kleunen M, Dawson W,Schlaepfer D, et al. Areinvaders different. A conceptual framework of com-parative approaches for assessing determinants ofinvasiveness [J]. Ecology Letters, 2010, 13 (8):947-958.
  • 3黄乔乔,沈奕德,李晓霞,程汉亭,宋鑫,范志伟.外来入侵植物在中国的分布及入侵能力研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(5):977-985. 被引量:43
  • 4Davidson A M, Jennions M, Nicotra A B. Do invasivespecies show higher phenotypic plasticity than na-tive species and, if so, is it adaptive. Ameta-analysis [J], Ecology letters,2011, 14(4):419-431.
  • 5Palacio L6pez K, Gianoli E. Invasive plants do notdisplay greater phenotypic plasticity than theirnative or non-invasive counterparts: a meta—anal-ysis[J]. Oikos,2011, 120(9): 1 393-1 401.
  • 6耿宇鹏,张文驹,李博,陈家宽.表型可塑性与外来植物的入侵能力[J].生物多样性,2004,12(4):447-455. 被引量:152
  • 7Richards C L, Bossdorf 0,Muth N Z,et al. Jack ofall trades, master of some. On the role of pheno-typic plasticity in plant invasions [J]. EcologyLetters, 2006,9(8): 981-993.
  • 8Bossdorf 0,Auge H, Lafuma L, et al. Phenotypic andgenetic differentiation between native and intro-duced plant populations [J]. Oecologia, 2005,144(1) : 1-11.
  • 9Pan X, Geng Y, Zhang W, et al. The influence ofabiotic stress and phenotypic plasticity on thedistribution of invasive Alternanthera philoxeroidesalong a riparian zone [J]. Acta Oecologica, 2006,30(3) : 333-341.
  • 10Van Kleunen M, Fischer M. Constraints on the evo-lution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity inplants[J]. New Phytologist, 2005, 166(1): 49-60.

二级参考文献181

共引文献344

同被引文献67

引证文献4

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部