期刊文献+

直接冠脉内注射替罗非班在急性心肌梗死患者急诊PCI中治疗疗效的研究 被引量:27

Safety and efficacy study of direct intra-coronary injection of Tirofiban in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在急性心肌梗死(包括ST段抬高及非ST段抬高心肌梗死)患者行急诊PCI的过程中,冠脉内注射替罗非班继之静脉内持续泵入使用的安全性,以及能否进一步改善患者的急诊PCI疗效及减少术后近期心血管事件的发生率。方法回顾性分析2008年12月—2010年12月,37例急性心肌梗死患者行急诊PCI治疗时冠脉内注射了替罗非班继之静脉持续维持,另将同期的37例急性心肌梗死行急诊PCI时仅静脉内使用替罗非班的患者作为对照组,比较两组间的基础临床状况,术前术后梗死相关血管(IRA)的TIMI血栓积分(TIMI Thrombus Score)、TIMI血流分级(TIMI Flow Grades)、校正的TIMI血流帧数计数(Corrected TIMI Frame Count)、TIMI心肌灌注(TIMI Myocardial Perfusion)情况以及术后90 min心电图ST段回落百分比(sum-STR),以及住院期间主要心血管事件、出血事件及左室射血分数等。结果两者基础临床情况差异无显著性(P>0.05),冠脉内注射替罗非班继之静脉维持组术后达到TMP分级2级以上获得率(分别为94.6%和67.6%,P=0.003)、校正的TIMI帧数<25帧获得率(分别为91.9%和64.9%,P=0.005)、术后90 min心电图ST段回落百分比(sumSTR)(分别为67.6%和27.0%,P=0)、术后1周的射血分数[(56.62±6.897)和(51.59±6.817),P=0.002)]高于对照组,而两组的TIMI 3级血流的获得率以及两组住院期间的主要心血管事件发生率、出血事件发生率差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论在急性心肌梗死患者行急诊PCI治疗中冠脉内注射替罗非班继之静脉维持是安全的,可以提高心肌微血管水平的灌注,从而改善患者的短期临床预后,长期预后情况仍需进一步研究。 Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of direct intra-coronary injection of tirofiban followed by transfusion via vein in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI) undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods Between Dec 2008 and Dec 2010,74 patients with AMI were randomly assigned into tirofiban group and conventional PCI group,37 patients were given tirofiban intra coronary artery undergoing emergency PCI in tirofiban group,followed with continuous transfusion via vein,while the other 37 patients were treated by conventional PCI during the same period,who were only given tirofiban via vein undergoing emergency PCI.The basic clinic condition,TIMI thrombus score,TIMI flow grades,corrected TIMI frame count,TIMI myocardial perfusion and the resolution of the sum of ST-segment elevation(sumSTR) at 90 minutes after the procedure,recent cardiaovascular events,bleeding events before and after the procedure and left ventricular ejection fraction(EF) were compared between the two groups.Results No significant differences were shown in basic clinic condition,TIMI Ⅲ flow grades acquirtion,recent major cardiaovascular events and bleeding events between the two groups(P 0.05),but the former group acquire more TMP Grade 2 or 3 than the latter group(94.6% vs 67.6%,P = 0.003) and lower corrected TIMI frame count(91.9% vs 64.9%,P = 0.005),and patients received tirofiban from direct injection into coronary artery were more likely to achieve higher sumSTR(67.6% vs 27.0%,P = 0) and EF after one week [(56.62 ± 6.897) vs(51.59 ±6.817),P =0.002) ].Conclusion The study demonstrates that direct injection of tirofiban into crornary artery can be safe and efficient,which can improve the myocardial microcirculation reperfusion and patients’short-time prognosis,but long-time prognosis still needs more investigations.
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2013年第7期1209-1211,共3页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 替罗非班 急性心肌梗死 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 梗死相关血管 tirofiban acute myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) infarction related artery(IRA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, Fox KA, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-seg- ment elevation [ J ]. Eur Heart J,2002,23 ( 3 ) : 1809 - 1840.
  • 2Silber S, Albertsson P, Fernandez-Aviles F, et al. Guidelines for per- cutaneous coronary interbentions : the task force for percutaneous cor- onary interventions of the European society of cardiology [ J ]. Eur Heart J,2005,26 ( 16 ) : 804 - 847.
  • 3Eitel I, Desch S, Fuernau G, et al. Prognostic signifiacance and de- terminants of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in acute reperfused myocaridial infarction [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55(2) :2470-2479.
  • 4杨体霞,陈金国,周利民,陶春明,张军,王东平,沈童童,王三刚,李峰.易化PCI对比直接PCI治疗ST段抬高性心肌梗死的有效性及安全性分析[J].安徽医药,2011,15(2):169-171. 被引量:11
  • 5盛建龙,赵利华.急性心肌梗死范围影响因素分析[J].安徽医药,2011,15(8):986-987. 被引量:14
  • 6王玉平,丁明霞,赵树武.冠脉内注射替罗非班对STEMI患者急诊PCI术中无复流的疗效观察[J].天津医药,2012,40(2):159-160. 被引量:16
  • 7Liu CP,Lin MS,Chiu YW,et al. Additive benefit of glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲa inhibition and adjunctive thrombus aspiration during primary coronary intervention: Results of the Initial Thrombosuction and Tirofiban Infusion(ITYI) trial[ J]. International Journal of Cardiolo- gy ,2012,156 ( 11 ) : 174 - 179.
  • 8De Luca G, Ucci G, Gassetti E, et al. Benefits from small molecule administration as compared with abciximab among patients with ST- segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angio- plasty : a meta analysis[ J]. J Am Coll Cardio1,2009,53 ( 2 ) : 1668 - 1673.
  • 9Eitel I, Desch S, Schindler K, et al. Aborted myocardial infarction in introcoronary compared with standard intravenous abcimab adminis- tration in patients undergoing primary pereutaneous coronary inter- vention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction [ J ]. International Journal of Cardiology ,2011,153 (5) :21 - 25.
  • 10Eitel I, Fridenberger J, Fuernau G, et al. Intracoronary versus intra- venous bolus abciximab application in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary in- tervention:6-month effects on infarct size and left ventricular func- tion[J]. Clin Res Cardiol,2011,100(2) :425 -432.

二级参考文献26

  • 1陈跃峰,杨跃进.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后的无再流现象[J].心血管病学进展,2005,26(1):4-8. 被引量:48
  • 2陈明,蒋若瑜,解冰,洪涛,霍勇.溶栓联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略的效果和安全性[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2005,13(3):135-137. 被引量:3
  • 3Cantor WJ,Ohman EM.Facilitated PCI for acute MI:PCI with lysis and platelet inhibition[J].Curr interv cardial Rep,2001,3(4):321-9.
  • 4Gibson CM.A union in reperfusion:the concept of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,36(5):1497-9.
  • 5Thiele H,Engelmann L,Elsner K,et al.Comparison of pre-hospital combination-fibrinolysis plus conventional care with pre-hospital combination-fibrinolysis plus facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction[J].Eur Heart J,2005,26:1956-63.
  • 6La Scala E,Steffenino G,Dellavalle A,et al.Half-dose thrombolysis to begin with,when immediate coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction is not possible[J].Ital Heart J,2004,5(9):678-83.
  • 7Ross AM,Coyne KS,Reiner JS,et al.A randomized trial comparing primary angioplasty with a strategy of short-acting thrombolysis and immediate planned resue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction:the PACT trial.PACT investigators.Plasminogen-activator Angioplasty Compatibility Trial[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,34(7):1954-62.
  • 8McKay RG,Dada MR,Mather JF,et al.Comparison of outcomes and safety of "facilitated"versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segement elevation myocardial infarction[J].Am J Cardiol,2009,103(3):316-21.
  • 9Miller TD,Christian TF,Hopfenspirger MR,et al.Infarct size after acute myocardial infarction measured by quantitative tomographic 99mTc sestamibi imaging predicts subsequent mortality[J].Circulation,1995,92(3):334-41.
  • 10Burns RJ,Gibbons RJ,Yi Q,et al.The relationships of left ventricular ejection fraction,end-systolic volume index and infarct size to six-month mortality after hospital discharge following myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,39(1):30-6.

共引文献36

同被引文献221

引证文献27

二级引证文献218

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部