期刊文献+

艺术品市场的定价机制——关于美学价值与艺术声誉的理论讨论 被引量:5

The Pricing Mechanism of Art Market:A Theoretical Discussion of Aesthetic Value and Artistic Reputation
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为高度专业化的市场,艺术品的定价与信息问题密切相关,但传统经济学分析工具却未能给出令人满意的解释。本文试图通过考察艺术品市场在信息经济学模型分析中的悖论,来反思其交易和运作的本质特征。艺术品市场没有出现"逆向选择"困境并非因为存在信号传递的积极作用,而是由于不可(独立)确定的艺术价值使得多数买家只能通过社会评价结果来确定所获效用大小。艺术品市场定价机制的核心在于艺术声誉的生产与交换。这一分析结果表明对艺术品市场的考察不能局限于交易过程本身,而应当关注广义的建构艺术常规的集体行动过程。 As a highly specialized market, the pricing ot art is ctosety retaLeu of information, but traditional economics analytical tools cannot provide a satisfactory expla- nation. This paper tries to explore the paradox of art market through the analysis of infor- mation economics models to reflect on the nature and characteristics of its trading and opera- tion. The absence of adverse selection in art market is not because of the active role of signal transduction, just because of the determination of utility done by the majority of buyers only through social evaluation results owing to uncertain artistic value. The production and ex- change of artistic reputation is at the very core of the pricing mechanism of art market. It im- plies that the research on art market cannot be limited in the transaction process, but should focus on broad collective process of constructing art convention.
作者 严俊
出处 《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期19-26,共8页 Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
关键词 定价机制 信号传递 美学价值 艺术声誉 艺术常规 pricing mechanism signal transduction aesthetic value artistic reputatlon art convention
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1詹姆斯·海尔布伦,查尔斯·M·格雷.艺术文化经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:61-74.
  • 2加里·S.贝克尔.口味的经济学分析[M],北京:首都经贸大学出版社,2000:PIII.
  • 3弗兰克·道宾.经济社会学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2008.
  • 4DiMaggio, Paul. Culture and Economy[A]. in The Handbook of Economic Sociology[C]. edited by Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg. NJ. Princeton University Press, 1994: 27-57.
  • 5Chanel,Olivier. Is Art Market Behaviour Predictable? [J]. European Economic Review, 1995,39:519-527.
  • 6Grampp, William D. Pricing the Priceless: Art, Artists, and Economics[M]. New York. Basic Books, 1989 : 46.
  • 7中央美术学院艺术市场分析研究中心.艺术财富:全球艺术市场新格局[M].长沙:湖南美术出版社,2007:53,53,44,44.
  • 8Akerlof,George A. The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970,84(3) : 488-500.
  • 9Rothschild M. ,Stiglitz J. Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Market[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1976,90: 629-649.
  • 10Stiglitz J. ,Weiss A. Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect in formation[J]. American Economic Re- view, 1981,71 . 393-410.

共引文献35

同被引文献20

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部