期刊文献+

图尔敏的逻辑观述略 被引量:7

An Outline of S.Toulmin's View on Logic
原文传递
导出
摘要 在1958年出版的《论证的运用》(TheUsesofArgument)一书中,英国哲学家史蒂芬·图尔敏(StephenToulmin,1922--2009)试图通过对当时逻辑学研究方式和学科性质的理论反思,来揭示哲学与认识论研究中所潜藏的理论问题。由于书中对数学化、形式化研究方法提出质疑与挑战,该书一出版即遭到了形式逻辑学家的激烈批评,并最终被评定为一本包含理论偏见与错误的“反逻辑著作”。然而,半个世纪以来,图尔敏的逻辑思想尽管被放逐于哲学领域之外,但它在当代论证理论、修辞学、言语交际研究等领域备受推崇。同样,现代逻辑的发展虽然一直持守着其数学化、形式化的研究传统,但图尔敏当年所揭示的论证要素、推论强度、领域依赖等诸多议题,都以不同的方式重新得到当代形式逻辑学家的关注与探讨。这一略显吊诡的历史发展,既促发了当今学者重拾图尔敏著作的理论兴趣,同时也为我们重新审视其逻辑思想提供了更为全面的历史证据。 In spite of a poor reception of The Uses of Argument among formal logicians,Stephen Toulmin's ideas about argument and logic have continuously influenced contemporary argumentation studies in a significant way.This paper gives a comprehensive interpretation of Toulmin's view on logic.It is argued that Toulmin has rightly diagnosed the Practical Discontinuity of current logical studies,and his proposal of re-conceptualizing Logic as Generalized Jurisprudence is of special value and importance in reclaiming the discipline from losing its practical application in ordinary life.On that basis,it is also indicated,from a historical point of view,that Toulmin's view of logic has been misjudged,and its merits are indeed underestimated.
作者 谢耘 熊明辉
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期66-71,129,共6页 Philosophical Research
基金 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(编号12JJD720006) 2011年广东省高层次人才项目(编号粤财教[2011]431-24) 中山大学高校基本科研业务费青年教师培育项目资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Aristotle, 1925, Nichomachean Ethics, trans, by W. D. Ross, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 2Johnson, R. & Blair, J. , 2002, "Informal logic and the reconfiguration of logic", in D. Gabbay, R. Johnson, H. J. Ohlbach and J. Woods (eds.) , Handbook of the Logic of Argument and Inference: The Turn Towards the Practical, Amsterdam: Kluwer.
  • 3, 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Toulmin, S. E.1972, Human Understanding, Princeton : Princeton University Press.
  • 5Toulmin, S. E.1976, "Logic and the criticism of arguments", in J. Golden, G. Berquist and W. Coleman (eds.), The Rhetoric of Western Thought, Dubuque, IA : Kendall-Hunt.
  • 6Toulmin, S. E.2001, Return to Reason, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • 7Toulmin, S. E.2004, "Reasoning in theory and practice", in Informal Logic 24.
  • 8van Benthcm, J. , 2009. "One logician's perspective on argumentation", in Cogency 1.

同被引文献46

引证文献7

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部