我国博士后基金促进青年人才成长绩效分析被引量：12

The performance analysis of China postdoctoral science fund on promoting young talents growth

导出

摘要博士后科学基金自1985年设立以来,截至2011年底共资助博士后27412人,资助总额达到了6.9亿元,为我国的科技人才队伍培养了大量的人才。以我国博士后科学基金促进青年人才成长的绩效为研究对象,通过博士后科学基金资助统计分析和后续成长状况研究,验证我国博士后科学基金对稳定博士后队伍,提供"第一桶金",促进人才成长的作用;通过对首批受资助博士后发展现状的追踪和文献计量分析,以个案研究的方式,表明博士后科学基金的资助帮助科学家凝练了研究方向,为后续研究成果的取得奠定了基础。 The China Postdoctoral Science Fund （CPSF） has funding 27412 postdoctoral till 2011 since it was established in 1985, and the total funding reached 690 million yuan. In the past 25 years, the CPSF has trained a large number of talents for our country＇ s S＆T intelligent team. This paper focus on the performance of CPSF on promoting the growth of talented youth and carry out evaluation from the following aspects： 1. Verify the function of CPSF on stabilize the postdoctoral team, provide ＂ first bucket of gold＂ and pro- mote talents growth via funding statistical analysis and the subsequent growth condition of grantees; 2. Demonstrate the CPSF facilitate the grantees with extracting the research direction of scientist and lay the foundation for subsequent research results via the tracking of current situation and bibliometric analysis of first batch grantees.

作者樊威刘文澜杨芳娟宋赛赛

机构地区北京理工大学管理与经济学院清华大学经济管理学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期1171-1177,共7页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家自然科学基金重点项目(71033001)

关键词博士后基金文献计量绩效分析 postdoctoral science foundation bibliometric performance analysis

分类号 F213 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1中国博士后科学基金会.中国博士后科学基金会简介[EB/OL].http://www.chinapostdoctor.org.cn/V3/Program/Info_Show.aspx?InfoID=2814.2011-06-28.
2Pritchard A.Statistical Bibliography,an Interim Bibli-ography,Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Tech-nical Information[M].Springfield,1969.112-124.
3Pilkington A,Meredith J.The evolution of the intellec-tual structure of operations management:1980-2006:acitation/co-citation analysis[J].Journal of OperationsManagement,2009,27(3):185–202.
4Garner J,Porter A L.Assessing the human and socialdynamics program-exceptional cross-disciplinarily[C].Atlanta Conference on Science and InnovationPolicy,Atlanta,USA,2011.
5National Academies Committee on Science,Engineer-ing,and Public Policy(COSEPUP).Facilitating inter-disciplinary research[R].Washington,DC:NationalAcademies Press,2005.
6Stirling A.A general framework for analyzing diversityin science,technology and society[J].Journal of theRoyal Society Interface,2011,4(15):707–719.
7Porter A L,Rafols I.Measuring and mapping interdisci-plinarity in six research fields over time[C].2009 ISSIConference,2009,Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.
8Porter A L,Cohen A S,Roessner,J D,Perreault M.Measuring researcher interdisciplinary[J].Scientomet-rics,2007,72(1):117–147.
9Stephen Carley,Porter A L.A forward diversity index[J].Scientometrics,2012,90:407–427.
10Rafols I,Porter A L,Leydesdorff L.Overlay maps ofscience:their potential usage in science policy and re-search management[J].Journal of the American Socie-ty for Information Science and Technology,2010,61(9):1871–1887.