期刊文献+

长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗非小细胞肺癌 被引量:7

Treatment of non small cell lung cancer with vinorelbine plus cisplatin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 观察长春瑞滨 (诺维本 ,NVB)联合顺铂 (DDP)治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效。方法 :6 0例患者分别用NP(NVB加DDP)方案和MNP[丝裂霉素 (MMC)联合NVB与DDP]方案治疗。结果 :NP和MNP组有效率分别为42 9% (12 2 8)和 46 9% (15 32 ) ,两者无显著差异 (P >0 0 5 )。分析诸多因素对疗效的影响发现 ,病期早较病期晚疗效好 ,鳞癌比腺癌疗效好。骨髓抑制为限制性毒性 ,白细胞下降NP组为 82 1% ,MNP组为 87 5 % ,P >0 0 5 ,无其他严重毒副反应。结论 :治疗非小细胞肺癌 ,NP方案能获得与MNP方案相似的疗效 。 Purpose:To observe the therapeutic effects of vinorelbine (NVB) plus cisplatin (DDP) (NP regimen) for the treatment of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods:60 cases were treated with NP (NVB plus DDP) or MNP[mitomycin (MMC) plus NVB and DDP] regimen. Results:Response rates were 42.9% (12/28) and 46.9%(15/32),respectively for these two regimens. No statistical difference was noted in responses between these two groups (P>0 05). Neutropenia was the dose limiting toxicity and occurred in 82.1% of cases in the NP regimen and 87.5% in the MNP regimen (P>0 05). No other serious side reactions occurred in either groups. Conclusions:The NP regimen can obtain results just as good as with the MNP regimen in the treatment of NSCLC.
出处 《中国癌症杂志》 CAS CSCD 2000年第4期312-313,共2页 China Oncology
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 长春瑞滨 顺铂 联合用药 lung tumor non small cell lung cancer vinorelbine combination chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1ChevalierTL,BriggandD,DouillardJY,etal.Randomizedstudyofvinorelbineandcisplatinversusvindesineandcisplatinversusvinorelbinealoneinadvancednon-small-celllungcancer:resultsofaEuropeanmulticentertrialincluding612patients[J].ClinOncol,1944,12(2):360-364.
  • 2DepierreA,ChastangC,Quoxic,E,etal.Vinorelbineversusvinorelbinepluscisplatininadvanccdnon-small-celllungcancer:arandomizedtrial[J].AnnOncol,1994,5(1):37-42.
  • 3管忠震,张力,张湘茹,孙燕.Navelbine治疗晚期肺癌的Ⅱ期临床研究报告[J].癌症,1993,12(3):217-219. 被引量:92

共引文献91

同被引文献28

  • 1唐桂棣,孙晓峰,曹国春,吴罕利.顺铂联合植物碱类抗癌药治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌96例临床分析[J].癌症,1997,16(3):230-231. 被引量:23
  • 2[1]Crawford J. Update: Vinorelbine (navelbine) in non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol,1996,23(2 Suppl 5)∶2-7.
  • 3[2]Le Chevalier T, Brisgand D, Douillard JY, et al. Randomized study of vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vindesine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a European multicenter trial including 612 patients. J Clin Oncol,1994,12(2)∶360-367.
  • 4[6]Krikorian A. Pharmacokinetics of navelbine. In: Pierre Fabine Oncologie,eds. Update and new trends. 1st edition. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext Ltd,1991.43-52.
  • 5[7]Depierre A, Chastang C, Quoix E, et al. Vinorelbine versus vinorebine plus cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. Ann Oncol,1994,5(1)∶37-42.
  • 6[8]Baldini E, Tibaldi C, Ardizzoni A, et al. Cisplatin-vindesine-mitomycin (MVP) vs cisplatin-ifosfamide-vinorelbine (PIN) vs carboplatin-vinorelbine (CaN) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A FONICAP randomized phase Ⅱ study. Italian Lung Cancer Task Force (FONICAP). Br J Cancer,1998,77(12)∶2367-2370.
  • 7Jeffrey Crawford. Update:Vinorebine(Navebine) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Seminars in Oncology,1996;23(Snpp15) :2-7.
  • 8LeChevalier T, Pujol JL, DouiUard JY, et al.Randomizized Study of Vinorelbine and Cisplatin Versus Vindesine and Cisplatin Versus Vinorelbine Alone in Advanced NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer:. Results of a European Multicenter Trial Including 612 Patients. J CAin Oncol; 1994; 12:360-367.
  • 9Krikofian A.Phannacokinetics of Navelbine.In:Pierre Fabine Oncologie, eds Update and New Trends 1 st Edition. John Libbey Eurotext Lid: France, 1991:43-52.
  • 10Depierre A, Chastang C, Quoix E, et al:Vinorelbine versus vinorebine plus cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol, 1994:5 37-42.

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部