期刊文献+

内幕信息形成时间判断规则研究 被引量:5

The Judgment Rule of Insider Information Formation Time
下载PDF
导出
摘要 确定内幕信息形成时间是内幕交易性质与数额认定的基础。最新内幕交易犯罪司法解释并未解决内幕信息形成时间判断的核心难题与实践障碍。立法既要根据资本市场现实对内幕信息形成时间适度提前认定,又要在评估高风险信息基础上排除其具有重大性的可能。并购重组是内幕交易重灾区,有必要深度分析并购重组中内幕信息的形成规律,建构类型化司法判断规则,并以此为鉴逐步研究其他类型的内幕信息形成时间认定规则。此外,判断内幕信息形成时间应以更为接近个案专属特征的指导性案例细化例外情形。 The determination of the time when the insider information has been in shape is the foundation of qualitative and quantitative analysis of the crime of insider trading. The recently published judicial interpretation of insider trading did not solve the core and difficult problems underlying the judgment of the time when the insider information has been in shape. The estimation of this time should be moderately advanced. But the possibility of materiality should be ruled out on the basis of the high risk nature of the nonpublic information. Mergers and acquisitions (M & A) are the severely affiliated area of the crime of insider trading. It is necessary to analyze the formation pattern of the insider information in the process of M & A intensively, on which the typed judicial rules can be established. And this can provide experiences to determine the time of formation of other types of insider information. The exceptional rules should be induced from the directive precedents which can reflect the exclusive characteristics of each piece of insider information.
作者 谢杰
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期69-78,共10页 Securities Market Herald
关键词 内幕交易 内幕信息 司法规则 insider trading, insider information, judicial rules
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1谢杰.最新内幕交易犯罪司法解释的缺陷与规则优化[J].法学,2012(10):136-145. 被引量:23
  • 2谢杰.内幕交易罪若干疑难问题的实践认定[J].吉林公安高等专科学校学报,2011,26(5):93-97. 被引量:6
  • 3Nicolas Calcina Howson.Enforcement without Foundation-Insider Trading andChina’’s Administrative Law Crisis[].American Journal of Comparative Law.2012
  • 4Hazen,Thomas Lee.The Law of Securities Regulation[]..2005
  • 5Stefan Padfield.Who Should Do the Math?Materiality Issues in Disclosures that Require Investors to Calculate the Bottom Line[].Pep-perdine Law Review.2007
  • 6.SEC v.Texas Gulf Sulphur Co[].Fd.1968
  • 7.Radiation Dynamics,Inc v Goldmuntz[].Fd.1972
  • 8.S.E.C.v.Wyly[].FSuppd (SDNY ).
  • 9.In reWentz[].FedSecLRep (CCH) (AdminProcMay ).
  • 10.Tsc Industries,Inc.v.Northway,Inc[].US.1976

二级参考文献34

  • 1吕蕾.资产注入遭遇“暗礁”行政认定函能否推定其罪-专家热议证券内幕交易的“罪与非罪”[N].上海法治报.2010-07-09.
  • 2詹志强.中国“券商内幕交易第一案”内幕[N].检察日报.2009-01-22.
  • 3周浙玲.天山纺织重组内幕交易详情曝光[N].中国证券报.2011-01-18.
  • 4苏江.涨停王高淳陶瓷内幕交易真相[N].21世纪经济报道.2011-01-15.
  • 5Frank H. Easterbrook, Monopoly, Manipula- tion, and theregulation of Futures Markets [J]. 59 Journal of Business 103,106 (1986).
  • 6杨维汉,崔清新.《惩治内幕交易犯罪 维护资本市场秩序--最高人民法院有关负责人就首部证券期货犯罪司法解释答记者问》.《检察日报》2012年5月23日第2版.
  • 7张先明.《“两高”联合出台司法解释 指导司法机关正确办理内幕交易犯罪案件》.《人民法院报》2012年5月23日第1版.
  • 8《内幕交易犯罪解释》第6条.
  • 9《期货交易管理条例》第85务第11项.
  • 10《期货交易管理条例》第85条第12项.

共引文献26

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部