期刊文献+

间接性话语的冲突回应及说话人权势的非对称现象 被引量:12

Asymmetric relation between the conflict response strategies and speakers' power
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文在介绍间接性话语的冲突回应策略基础上,探讨了医患工作会话中间接性话语的冲突回应及说话人权势关系,分析了现象背后隐含的语篇中权势与语篇后权势非对称现象的原因。研究表明,在应对潜在冲突时,医生更多使用间接的防御性冲突回应方式,而患者及其家属主要使用直接的攻击性冲突回应方式。尽管医生语篇后的权势大于患者和患者家属,但在医患冲突语篇中,医生比患者和患者家属表现得更为礼貌;医患之间的冲突回应与双方权势关系之间呈现大量非对应现象。 The present paper explores the response strategies in offending situations which have been inflamed by indirect speech acts,with special reference to the power relation between doctors and patients in institutional discourse.Focusing on the imbalance of power relation within discourse and in reality,this study shows that doctors in China tend to adopt an indirect defensive response strategy when handling conflict situations,while patients and their family are inclined to use a direct offensive response strategy.Though the doctors seem to have more institutional power than the patients,they are not more impolite than the patients in conflict talk.There exists an asymmetric relation between speakers' power and the degree of politeness for their response strategies.
作者 韩艳梅
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期254-261,329-330,共8页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目(GD12CWW08)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Archer, D. 2011. Cross-examining lawyers, facework and the adversarial courtroom [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3216-3230.
  • 2Bousfield, D. 2007a. Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges [ J]. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 2185-2216.
  • 3Bousfield, D. 2007b. Impoliteness, preference organization and conductivity [J]. Multilingua 26:1-33.
  • 4Bousfield, D. 2008a. Impoliteness in Interaction [M]. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • 5Bousfield, D. 2008b. Impoliteness in the struggle for power [A]. In D. Bousfield & M. A. Locher( eds.). Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice [C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 127-154.
  • 6Culpeper, J., D. Bousfield & A. Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 35 : 1545-1579.
  • 7Drew P. & J. Heritage. 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Grice, H. P. 1975.
  • 8Logic and conversation [A]. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics, Vol.3: Speech. Acts [C]. New York: Academic Press, 43-58.
  • 9Heritage, J. & D. Maynard. 2006. Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Huston, S.& G. Thompson. 2000.
  • 10Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

二级参考文献150

共引文献454

同被引文献128

引证文献12

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部