美国贸易救济案例中的裁决准则与新近变化:基于美对华太阳能“双反”案的考察

The Ruling Principles and Recent Changes in the Trade Remedy Case of Us:Based On the Study of Dumping and Subsidization of Solar Energy Case Between US and China

美国对华光伏太阳能"双反"案持续一年多,美国国际贸易委员会实质性损害的肯定裁决,意味着该案暂告一段落。但是本案中美国政府(商务部)的裁决准则和贸易政策的新近变化,却值得后续关注。尤其是案件中涉及调查范围、替代国选择、单独税率、双重救济等法律问题,颇具代表性,并且对今后的"双反"案件具有很强的指示效应。问题的关键还在于对于上述法律问题的理解,中美双方仍然存在分歧,贸易纠纷并未停息。

： The case of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells between US and China has lasted more than one years, the United States International Trade Commission （USITC） identifies the substantial damage caused by Dumping and Subsidization, which means the case come to an end temporarily. However, the ruling principles and the recent changes of the trade practice of the US govern ment （ Ministry of Commerce） in this case, deserve further attention. Especially the scope of the in vestigation, surrogate country, separate rate, double remedies. The judgment in this ease has strong indicative effect in the following cases . The key problem lies in the understanding of the legal is sues, and both sides still exist differences. The trade disputes do not cease.