期刊文献+

企业异质性与出口:基于中国制造业企业数据的检验 被引量:2

Firm Heterogeneity and Export: an Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Manufacturing Firm - level Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于异质企业模型,运用1998—2007年中国制造业14个行业的企业数据,从两方面检验企业异质性与出口行为之间的关系,即企业异质性与出口状态(出口与否)之间关系的检验和企业异质性与出口规模之间关系的检验。研究结果表明,总体上看,中国企业出口行为基本符合异质企业模型的预测,即生产率高的企业选择出口,且生产率越高出口规模越大,而生产率低的企业仅仅或主要服务于国内市场,但这一关系在内外资企业之间存在较大差别。此外,虽然人力资源、技术创新等因素亦对企业出口规模有显著作用,但总体上看生产率仍然是我们所考虑的变量中最为稳定、重要的因素。 This paper uses 1998 -2007 firm -level data of 14 manufacturing industries in China and heterogeneous firm model to make empirical analysis on relationship between firm heterogeneity and export behavior from two perspectives, i. e. the relationship between firm heterogeneity and export state (export or not) and the relationship between firm heterogeneity and export scale. Empirical evidence demonstrates that Chinese firms act in accordance with the expectation of heterogene- ous firm model on the whole, that is, the firms with higher TFP (total factor productivity) tend to enter and sell more in the foreign market and the firms with lower TFP mainly or merely sell in domestic market, but a great difference exists between domestic and foreign invested firms. In addition, although the factors such as human resources and technology innovation have significant effects on export scale, TFP still plays the most stable and important role among the variables in our empiri- cal model on average.
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第15期111-116,共6页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"后危机时代全球分工发展趋势及其对我国经济发展的影响"(09AZD015) 广东省教育厅人文社科重大攻关项目"全球分工模式的演变与广东产业新的竞争优势培育研究"(10ZGXM79005)
关键词 异质企业 全要素生产率 出口 制造业 firm heterogeneity total factor productivity export manufacturing
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献98

  • 1江小涓.我国出口商品结构的决定因素和变化趋势[J].经济研究,2007,42(5):4-16. 被引量:194
  • 2Bernard, Andrew B., Jonathan Eaton, J. Bradford Jensen, and Samuel S. Kortum.2003. "Plants and Productivity in International Trade" American Economic Review,93(4): 1286-90.
  • 3Bernard, Andrew B., J. Bradford Jensen, and Peter K. Schott.2006. "Trade Costs, Firms, and Productivity." Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(5):917-37
  • 4Bernard, Andrew B., Stephen J. Redding, and Peter K. Schott. 2006a. "Multi-product Firms and Product Switching." NBER Working Paper 12293.
  • 5Bernard, Andrew B., Stephen J. Redding, and Peter K. Schott.2006b. "Multi-product Firms and Trade Liberalization." NBER Working Paper 12782.
  • 6Bernard, Andrew B., Stephen J. Redding, and Peter K. Schott.2007. "Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Finns." Review of Economic Studies, 74(1):31-66.
  • 7Helpman, Elhanan (2006) "Trade, FDI and the Organization of firm" NBER Working Papers 12091
  • 8Melitz, Marc J. 2003. "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity." Econometrics, 71 (6):1695-1725.
  • 9Stephen Yeaple, (2005) "Firm Heterogeneity, International Trade and Wages" , Journal of International Economics 65, 1-20.
  • 10AW B Y, CHUNG, SUKKYUN,ROBERTS M J. 1999. Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro Evidence from Taiwan and South Korea. [ A ]. The World Bank Economic Review, (2).

共引文献694

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部