期刊文献+

不同知识位势下知识获取方式与突变创新的关系研究 被引量:41

Research on the Relationship of Knowledge Acquisition Modes and Radical Innovation under Different Levels of Knowledge Potential
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文主要研究了在不同知识位势下,内部知识共享和外部市场获取两种知识获取方式对突变创新的影响。根据对西安市高新区103家高技术企业的调查研究,对相关数据进行了回归分析,认为当企业在知识宽度足够"宽"的时候,对突变创新影响大的是企业内部知识共享能力,当企业的知识深度足够"深"的时候,对突变创新影响大的是企业外部知识获取能力。所以本研究对于进行突变创新的企业,在了解自身知识宽度和深度的同时,是加强内部知识共享还是强化从外部获取异质知识提供了相应的理论指导。 This paper mainly studied the effect of knowledge integration mechanisms between internal knowledge sharing and external knowledge access on radical innovation under different intellectual potential. According to the investigation of 103 high technology enterprise from Xi'an the high-tech area and regression analysis, we find that when the knowledge width of enterprise is "wider", the effect of internal knowledge sharing on radical innovation is greater; when the knowledge depth of enterprise is "deeper", the effect of external knowledge access on radical innovation is greater. The results provide theoretical guidance for enterprises to balance internal knowledge sharing and external knowledge access according to the width and depth of knowledge.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第7期88-98,共11页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70972051 71172201 71172200) 教育部人文社科规划项目(10YJA630072) 陕西省重点学科建设专项资金项目(10700X901)
关键词 知识位势 知识获取方式 突变创新 knowledge potential, knowledge acquisition modes, radical innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1陈傲,柳卸林.突破性技术从何而来?——一个文献评述[J].科学学研究,2011,29(9):1281-1290. 被引量:27
  • 2Nelson R., Winter S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change[M]. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1982.
  • 3Sosa M. L. Application-specific R&D Capabilities and the Advantage of Incumbents: Evidence from the Anticancer Drug Market[J]. Management Science, 2009,55(8):1409-1422.
  • 4陈宁,常鹤.企业创新决策与成长路径——基于资源学派视角的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2012,30(3):458-465. 被引量:9
  • 5Von Hippel E. Democratizing Innovation[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.
  • 6Anderson P., Tushman M. L. Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990,35(4):604-633.
  • 7Christina Schmickl, Alfred Kieser. How Much do Specialists Have to Learn From Each Other When They Jointly Develop Radical Product Innovations?[J]. Research Policy, 2008,37(6/7): 1148-1163.
  • 8Reinders Machiel J., Frambach Ruud T., Schoormans Jan P. L. Using Product Bundling to Facilitate the Adoption Process of Radical Innovations[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010,27(7): 1127-1140.
  • 9Cassiman B., Veugelers R. In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisi- tion[J]. Management Science, 2006,52(1):68-82.
  • 10Liao S. H., Wu C. C., Hu D. C., et al. Relationships Between Knowledge Acquisition, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study on Taiwan's Financial and Manufacturing Industries[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2010,36(1):19-35.

二级参考文献256

共引文献609

同被引文献796

引证文献41

二级引证文献387

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部