期刊文献+

网络结构模式与员工个人绩效——基于整体网络的分析 被引量:9

Network Structure Mode and Employees’ Performance——based on Whole-network Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 结构洞是社会网络的重要测度指标之一,已有关于结构洞与个人绩效之间关系的研究主要针对单一网络,缺少多种类型网络的比较分析;由结构洞所决定的中介人身份的影响范围问题也一直被国内企业员工绩效的研究所忽视。针对以上问题,本文从整体网络的视角出发,依据结构洞理论,以中国某中小企业118名员工为研究对象,通过分析其正式网络及非正式网络,探究影响企业员工个人绩效的网络结构模式。研究结果表明:(1)与正式网络相比,非正式网络显著地影响着员工的个人绩效;(2)间接跨越结构洞的资源是企业员工难以利用的,而直接中介人相比间接中介人会获得更高的个人绩效;(3)"中介人的中介人"网络结构模式才是带来企业员工获利的根本。 Structural hole is one of the important indicators of social networks. As for relationship between structural holes and individual performance, previous researches mainly focus on one type of social network, lacking of comparison of different types of social networks. Besides it, few researches have considered the reach of structural holes on Chinese SME. In this paper, considering two types of networks and the scope of power from structural holes, using data of network and performance of 118 employees of a Chinese enterprise, the authors aim to clarify the relationship between employees' performance and their social network structure in Chinese SME form whole-network perspective. The results show that the informal network, but not formal network, has a significant impact on employees' performance. Individual performance of brokerage is greater for direct contacts than indirect contacts. Broker-of-brokers will be the winner of the competition.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第7期143-155,共13页 Management Review
基金 微软亚洲研究院(MSRA)"组织结构与团队绩效"项目 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"(NCET-08-0451) 国家自然科学基金项目(71071128) 国家自然科学基金项目(71161130176) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金
关键词 正式网络 非正式网络 结构洞 网络约束 个人绩效 formal network, informal network, structural holes, network constraint, individual performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1Burt R. S. The Network Structure of Social Capital[M]//Robert I. S., Barry M. S. Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 2000.
  • 2Burt R. S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
  • 3Burr R. S. Network Duality of Social Capital[M]//Viva O. B., James H. D. Social Capital: Reaching out, Reaching in Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2009.
  • 4Barry M., Wilier D., Patton T. Power Relations in Exchange Networks[J]. American Sociological Review, 1988,53(2):220-236.
  • 5Cook K. S., Emerson R. M., Fillomre M. K., et al. The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Re- suits[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1983,89(2):275-305.
  • 6Willer D. Network Exchange Theory[M]. New York: Praeger, 1999.
  • 7Burr R. S., Guilarte M., Raider H. J., et al. Competition, Contingency, and the External Structure of Markets[M]//Paul I., Brian S.Advances in Strategic Management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 2002.
  • 8Jang H. Market Structure, Performance, and Putting-Out in the Korean Economy[D]. Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, 1997.
  • 9Yasuda Y. 'etwork Analysis of Japanese and American Markets[M]. Tokyo: Bokntakusha, 1996.
  • 10Granovetter M. S. Getting a Job. Chicago[M]. IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

二级参考文献173

共引文献742

同被引文献223

引证文献9

二级引证文献159

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部