刑法立法拟制研究

Studies on Criminal Legal Fiction

刑法立法拟制是大陆法系国家法律拟制的主要方式之一,通过赋予原事实以相同法律后果的立法方式,刑法立法拟制满足了拟制规范的形式合理性。然而,这种决断性虚构仍难免虚置原犯罪构成、违背实质的罪刑法定、强调社会保护等有违实质正义缺陷。比较研究表明,我国现行刑法中的立法拟制类别及拟制条款过多,有损刑法的严谨性与权威性。应在尽量保持刑法稳定的前提下,根据拟制的要素内容的不同,对我国现行刑法立法拟制进行折衷的限制论视角下的发展理路拓清。

Criminal legal fiction, as an important way of legal fiction in the Continental Legal System, meets formal ra- tionality of legal norm with stipulating the same result for different acts. Moreover, this kind of decisive fiction has the de- fects of making the original criminal constitution dummy, disobeying the substantial prescription punishment and emphasi- zing social protection. Comparative studies show that there are too many fictions in kind and number in our criminal law that harm the authority of the criminal law. With the condition of stability maintenance, the direction of the criminal legal fiction should be arranged according to the fiction elements and with compromise and limitative viewpoint.