期刊文献+

血清淀粉样蛋白A在缺血性及扩张型心肌病患者中的鉴别及临床意义 被引量:3

The Value of Serum Amyloid Ain Identification and Assessment between Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Dilated Cadiomyopathy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:缺血性心肌病心力衰竭与扩张型心肌病心力衰竭均表现为充血性心力衰竭,在临床中不易鉴别。本文探讨血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)在二者鉴别中的临床价值。方法:选取60例住院患者,应用临床表现、心脏超声和部分患者冠脉造影检查作为金指标确定缺血性心肌病患者(A组,30例),扩张型心肌病患者(B组,30例),并选取健康对照组(C组,15例)。测定各组血清SAA浓度。比较各组SAA水平的差异,并绘制ROC曲线。结果:A组SAA水平明显高于C组,[(2.3805±1.267)ng/ml vs(0.9936±0.276)ng/ml,P<0.01],B组亦高于C组[(1.7567±0.2448)ng/ml vs(0.9936±0.276)ng/ml],P<0.01,但A组SAA水平明显高于B组,二者比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.0126)。ROC曲线显示,采用SAA浓度为1.929ng/ml作为界值诊断缺血性心肌病的灵敏度为60%,特异度为83.3%。所得阳性似然比为3.5928。结论:缺血性心肌病时SAA水平明显升高,而扩张型心肌病则不同,有鉴别诊断意义。 Objective:To discuss the clinical value of SAA in distinguishing ischemic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy both which present as congestive heart failure.Methods:We determined the levels of SAA in each patient when they are admitted and calculated the sensitivity,specificity,positive likelihood ration in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.We also describe the ROC curve,and compare the difference of SAA among the groups.Results:SAA were much higher in ICM and DCM patients than normal control [(2.3805±1.267,(1.7567±0.2448) vs.(0.9936±0.276))ng/ml,P〈0.01.But the level of SAA in ICM was also much higher than DCM(P=0.0126).Using the concentration of SAA for 1.929 ng/ml as the boundary to diagnosis the ischemic cardiomyopathy,the sensitivity is 60%,and the specificity is 83.3%,and the positive likelihood ration are 3.5928.Conclusions:The level of SAA elevates obviously in ischemic cadiomyopathy.SAA could use as a clinical screening examination.
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2013年第6期925-927,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词 血清淀粉样蛋白A 充血性心力衰竭 缺血性心肌病 扩张型心肌病 Serum amyloidA(SAA) Congestive heart failure Ischemic cadiomyopathy Dilated cadiomyopathy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献98

  • 1马丽萍,秦永文,郑兴,吴弘,丁继军,赵仙先,郭品娥.高敏感C反应蛋白和淀粉样物质A与冠状动脉病变程度的关系[J].第二军医大学学报,2004,25(7):763-765. 被引量:4
  • 2王旋,程龙献,崔天盆,张红梅,何美安,廖玉华,邬堂春.血清淀粉样蛋白A与冠心病及冠心病危险因素的关系[J].临床心血管病杂志,2004,20(12):745-747. 被引量:15
  • 3范乐明.动脉粥样硬化炎症机制的再认识[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2005,13(3):249-253. 被引量:73
  • 4吴惠玲,何国祥,刘建平,冉擘力,李永华,仝识非,姚青,唐波.血浆超敏C反应蛋白水平与冠心病及粥样斑块的关系[J].临床心血管病杂志,2006,22(7):405-407. 被引量:30
  • 5Kullo lJ ,Edwards WD,Schwartz RS. Vulnerable plaque pathobiology and clinical implications[J]. Am Intern Med, 1998,129( 12): 1050- 1060.
  • 6Schroedcr S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A, et al. Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2001 ,37(5) : 1430 - 1435.
  • 7Naghavi M,Libby P,Falk E,el al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: A call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies:part Ⅱ[J].Cilculation,2003,108 (15):1772-1778.
  • 8Calabro P, Willerson JT, Yeh ET. Inflammatory cytokines stimulated C - reactive protein production by human coronary artery smooth muscle cells[J]. Circulation,2003,108(16) : 1930 - 1932.
  • 9Verma S,Szmitko PE,Ridker PM. C - reactive protein comes of age [J]. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med,2005,2(1):29-36.
  • 10O'Brien KD. Chait A. Serum amyloid A:The other inflammatory protein[J]. Curr Atheroscler Rep,2006,8(1):62-68.

共引文献28

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部