期刊文献+

试卷难度对作弊甄别方法临界值的影响 被引量:2

The Effect of Test Difficulty to the Critical Value of Cheating Detection Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,在大规模考试结束后,应用作弊甄别方法对考生答卷进行作答雷同分析已经成为一项必不可少的工作。本研究提出一种全新的判定甄别方法临界值的思路,并选取试卷难度这个最主要的评价指标,分析试卷难度变化时,作弊甄别方法的临界值的变化情况,从而更准确更高效地进行作弊甄别工作。 At present, after large scale tests, it is indispensable to apply cheating detection to analyze examinee' s answers. The research here present a new idea to determine the critical value of cheating detection methods.In order to detect cheating more efficiently and more precisely, we choose the level of test difficulty as the main assessment criteria to analyze the how the thresholds of cheating detection methods vary with it.
作者 孔祥
出处 《中国考试》 2013年第8期9-15,共7页 journal of China Examinations
关键词 难度 作弊 甄别 临界值 Test Difficulty Cheating Detection Critical Value
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Bird,C. An improved method of detecting cheating in objective ex- aminations .Journal of Educational Research ,1929,19(5),341-348.
  • 2Bock,R.D. Estimation of item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories.Psychom- ereika, 1972,46,443-459.
  • 3Frary,R.B.,& Tideman,T.N. Comparison of two indices of answer copying and development of a spliced index. Educational and Psy- chological Measurment,1997,57(1),20-32.
  • 4Frary,R.B. Detection of answer copying on multiple-choice tests and interception of g: statistics. Educational Statistics,1977,2, 235-256.
  • 5Wollack,J.A. A nominal response model approach to detect answer copying. Applied Psychological Measurement,1997,21(4),307-320.
  • 6Angoff, W.H. The development of statistical indices .For detecting cheaters. Journal of the American Statistical Association,1974,69 (345):44-49.
  • 7Saupe,J.L. An empirical model for the corroboration of suspected cheating on multiple-choice tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement,1960, 20(3),475-490.
  • 8Sotaridona,L.S., &Meijer, R.R. Two new statistics to detect answer copying. Journal of Educational Measurement,2003,40,53-69.
  • 9Goldsen,R.K. What college students think. Princeton, NJ,1960. D. Van Nostrand. Holland. Assessing unusual agreement between the incorrect answers of two examinees using the K-index: Statistical theory and empirical support. Educational Testing Service. 1996.
  • 10Baker, F.B. Two parameter:The forgotten model.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Ed- ucation, San Francisco,CA. 1986b,April.

同被引文献6

  • 1高考第一天山西发现lO个无线电作弊信号[EB/OL].http ://www. xinhuanet, com/newscenter/2013 06/08/c 116081133. htm.
  • 22013年高考查处无线电作弊案件61起[EB/OL].http://www. bj. xinhuanet, eom/bjyw/2013 -07/13/c_116521982. htm.
  • 3湖北钟祥妥善处置高考点考生围堵监考老师事件[EB/OL].http ://news. xinhuanet, com/politics/2013 -06/09/c_124835971. htm.
  • 4教育部:今年高考所有考点全程监控[EB/OL].http://news.xinhuanet, com/eduf2013 -05/08/c_124677624. htm.
  • 5高考人数连续5年下降2013仅912万人考试[EB/OL].http ://epc. people, com. cn/n/2013/O606/e87228 -21761786. html.
  • 6孔祥.矩阵维度对Kappa作弊甄别方法性能的影响[J].考试研究,2013,9(6):54-58. 被引量:4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部