脑血管造影术后不同加压止血方法的效果及安全性的对比研究

Comparative Study of Cerebral Angiography after Different Direct Pressure Method is Effective and Safety

目的比较脑血管造影术后不同加压止血方法的效果及安全性。方法选取本院2010年12月至2012年12月行脑血管造影术患者的126例,随机分为对照组64例(传统绷带加压止血组)和观察组62例(动脉压迫器压迫止血组)。比较两组患者的效果及安全性。结果观察组鞘管部位渗血、迷走反射、血肿形成、假性动脉瘤的发生率均明显少于对照组,观察组的止血时间及制动时间均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论动脉压迫止血器止血的止血时间短,可减少术后并发症,减少患者卧床时间,是一种值得临床推广的止血方法。

Objective To compare different after cerebral angiography, efficacy, and safety of direct pressure method. Methods Our hospital from December 2010 to December 2012, 126 patients with cerebral angiography, 64 cases were randomly divided into control group （traditional bandage compression hemostasis group） and observation group 62 cases （group artery compressor compression hemostasia）. Compare the effect and safety of two groups of patients. Results The observation group ooze blood sheath tube parts, vagus reflex, the incidence rate of hematoma, false aneurysm were significantly less than the control group, the bleeding time and braking time in observation group were better than control group, the difference had statistical significance （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The artery compression hemostat hemostatic hemostatic time is short, can reduce the postoperative complications, reduce the patients lie in bed time, is a kind of hemostatic method is worthy of clinical promotion.