期刊文献+

经桡动脉途径行左主干介入治疗的有效性与安全性研究 被引量:2

The efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery by transradial approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经桡动脉途径行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)治疗的左主干病变的有效性及安全性。方法:选择2008年1月1日至2010年12月31日间,在我院经桡动脉途径使用6F指引导管行PCI治疗的左主干病变93例患者。记录患者住院期间和随访期间的全因病死率及症状驱动的左主干血运重建率。结果:男性占62.4%,平均年龄(62.5±15.47)岁。左主干病变狭窄程度(76.4±17.63)%,单纯开口部病变18.3%,单纯体部病变11.8%,累及远端分叉病变69.9%,Syntax积分为(23.5±12.33)分。均成功置入支架,共124枚药物洗脱支架(DES),平均直径(3.43±0.48)mm,平均长度(18.3±10.48)mm,单支架术39.8%,双支架技术共60.2%。住院期间无死亡病例。93例患者平均随访23.5个月,随访率100%,随访期间病死率3.2%。随访过程中Syntax评分低危组的患者发生终点事件的比例(4.9%)显著低于高危组(11.9%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论:经桡动脉6F指引导管处理左主干病变安全可行,能取得良好的近远期效果,其中Syntax评分<33分的患者预后更好。 Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)for left main coronary artery via 6F guiding catheter by transradial approach.Methods: A total of 93 patients with left main lesions receiving PCI via 6F guiding catheter by transradial approach were enrolled consecutively from Jan.1st,2008 to Dec.31st,2010.The primary endpoints included all-cause mortality and symptom-derived target vessel revascularization(TVR).Results: Male patients accounted for 62.4% of the cohort,and the mean age was(62.5±15.47).The stenosis severity of left main was(76.4±17.63)%.The left main ostial,shaft and bifurcation lesions accounted for 18.3%,11.8% and 69.9%of the cohort,respectively.The mean Syntax score was(23.5±12.33).All patients were stented successfully and 124 drug eluting stents were implanted.The mean diameter of the stents was(3.43±0.48)mm and mean length was(18.3±10.48)mm.There were 39.8% patients received single stent implantation and the others received double stents implantation.There were no patients died in hospital.All patients were followed up for(23.5±18.60)months with the all-cause mortality of 3.2%.The primary endpoints incidence in patients with Syntax score 33(4.9%) was significantly lower than those with Syntax score ≥33(11.9%,P 0.001).Conclusion: PCI for left main lesions via 6F guiding catheter by transradial approach is safe and feasible with good short-and long-term outcomes.And the prognosis in patients with Syntax score less than 33 is better than the others.
出处 《心肺血管病杂志》 CAS 2013年第4期422-425,433,共5页 Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases
关键词 冠状动脉介入治疗 经桡动脉 6F指引导管 左主干 Percutaneous coronary intervention 6-French guiding catheter Transradial Left main
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Tu JV,Ko DT,Guo H,et al.Determinants of variations in coro-nary revascularization practices.CMAJ,2012,184:179-186.
  • 2Chang K,Koh YS,Jeong SH,et al.Long-term outcomes of per-cutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypassgrafting for unprotected left main coronary bifurcation disease inthe drug-eluting stent era.Heart,2012,98:799-805.
  • 3Wu C,Camacho FT,Wechsler AS,et al.Risk score for predic-ting long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surger-y.Circulation,2012,125:2423-2430.
  • 4Patel MR,Dehmer GJ,Hirshfeld JW,et al.ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteriafor coronary revascularization focused update:a report of the A-merican college of cardiology foundation appropriate use criteriatask force,society for cardiovascular angiography and interven-tions,society of thoracic surgeons,American society of nuclearcardiology,and the society of cardiovascular computed tomo-graphy.J Am Coll Cardiol,2012,59:857-881.
  • 5Bertrand OF,Belisle P,Joyal D,et al.Comparison of transradi-al and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interven-tions:a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analy-sis.Am Heart J,2012,163:632-648.
  • 6Letachowicz K,Letachowicz W,Kusztal M,et al.Routine use ofthe transradial approach in primary percutaneous coronary inter-vention.Heart,2012,98:1106-1107.
  • 7Ratib K,Mamas MA,Routledge H,et al.Access site selectionfor primary PCI:the evidence for transradial access is strong.Heart,2012,98:1392-1393.
  • 8Farooq V,Vergouwe Y,Raber L,et al.Combined anatomicaland clinical factors for the long-term risk stratification of patientsundergoing percutaneous coronary intervention:the Logistic Clini-cal SYNTAX score.Eur Heart J,2012,.
  • 9Barner HB.Management of left main coronary disease.Eur JCardiothorac Surg,2011,40:1274-1275.
  • 10Fajadet J,Chieffo A.Current management of left main coronaryartery disease.Eur Heart J,2012,33:36-50b.

二级参考文献25

  • 1崔然,马宝,李占全,高阳.无保护左主干病变支架置入术的近、远期疗效[J].临床心血管病杂志,2006,22(2):120-121. 被引量:3
  • 2Sorin J B, John M G, Roosevelt MD, et al. Comparison of percutaneous versus surgical revaseularization of severe unprotected left main coronary stenosis in matched patients. Am J Cardiol, 2008, 101:169-172.
  • 3Lee MS, Kapoor N,Jamal F, et al. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery with percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006, 47 : 864-870.
  • 4Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, et al. Task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the european society of cardiology guildlines for percutaneous coronary interventions of the european society of cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2005, 26: 804-847.
  • 5Pawel E B, FACC Stefan R K, FACC A B, et al. Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 51: 538-545.
  • 6Jiro A, Andrew T L, Chourmouzios A, et al. Comparison of three-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with muhivessel coronary disease. Am J Cardiol, 2004, 94:627-631.
  • 7Favaloro RG. Saphenous vein autograft replacement of severe segmental coronary artery occlusion: operative technique. Ann Tho-rac Surg, 1968,5:334-339.
  • 8Smith SC, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervenfion:a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart associatlon task force on practice guidelines ( ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coil Cardiol, 2006, 47: el-el21.
  • 9Bittl JA. Advances in coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med, 1996, 335: 1290-1302.
  • 10Serruys PW, Kutryk MJB, Ong ATL. Engl J Med, 2006, 354:483-495.

共引文献18

同被引文献14

  • 1Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery ap-proach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1993,30 : 173-178.
  • 2Eichhtifer J, Horlick E, Ivanov J, et al. Decreased complication rates using the transradial compared to the transfemoral approach in percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of routine stent- ing and glycoprotein platelet IIb/Illa inhibitor use : a large single- center experience. Am Heart J, 2008,156:864-870.
  • 3Cruden NL, Teh CH, Starkey IR, et al. Redut::d vascular com- plications and length of stay with transradial rescue angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Irtterv, 2007, 70:670-675.
  • 4Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoceai GG, de Benedietis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures, Systematic overview and recta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2004,44:349-356.
  • 5Jiang W, Krishnan RR, O' Connor CM. Depression and heart disease: evidence of a link, and its therapeutic implications.CNS Drags, 2002, 16:111-127.
  • 6Ormel J, Von Korff M, Burger H, et al. Mental disorders among persions with heart disease-results from world. Gen Hosp Psychi- atry, 2007, 29: 325-334.
  • 7Pedersen SS, Ong AT, Sonuenschein K, et al. Type D personal- ity and diabetes predict the onset of depressive symptoms in pa- tients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J, 2006,151:367. el-367, e6.
  • 8Pedersen SS, Smith OR, De Vries J, et al. Course of anxiety symptoms over an 18-month period in exhausted patients post per- cutaneous coronary intervention. Psychosom Med, 2008,70:349- 355.
  • 9Dudek D, Datka W, Iwek MS, et al. The quality of life related to depressive symptoms in coronary artery disease patients after successful coronary angioplasty: one-year follow up. Psychiatr Pol, 2007, 41:229-242.
  • 10Pedersen SS, Denollet J, Daemen J, et al. Fatigue, depressive symptoms, and hopelessness as predictors of adverse clinical e- vents following percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel- eluting stents. J Psychosom Res, 2007,62:455-461.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部