期刊文献+

两种路径下腹腔镜输尿管切开取石疗效对比 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经腹与后腹腔腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石术的临床意义。方法:采用经腹腹腔镜输尿管切开取石40例,结石位于左侧16例,右侧24例;经后腹腔腹腔镜输尿管切开取石36例,结石位于左侧20例,右侧16例。将手术时间、出血量、术后下床活动时间、术后止痛剂运用情况、伤口引流管留置时间、术后住院时间进行对照研究。结果:两组手术均获成功。结论:经腹和经后腹腔腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术具有出血量少、术后疼痛轻、恢复快等优点,都能达到治愈效果,两种手术方式的选择取决于术者的娴熟程度。
出处 《医学理论与实践》 2013年第15期2036-2038,共3页 The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献12

  • 1Nualyong C, Taweemonkongsap T. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteric calculi. J Med Assoc Thai, 1999,82:1028--1033.
  • 2Gaur D D, Trivedi S, Prabhudesai M R, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. BJU Int, 2002,89 : 339-- 343.
  • 3Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, et al. Ureteral stones elinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi.J Urol,1997,158,1915.
  • 4Kijoto H, Ikemoto I, Asano K, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy for impacted ureteral stone. Int J Urol, 2001,8:391.
  • 5Hemal AK,Goel A,Goel R. Minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy, J Urology,2002,169:480-482.
  • 6Raboy A,Ferzli GS,Ioffreda R,et al.Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.Urology,1992,39:223-225.
  • 7Harewood LM,Webb DR,Pope AJ.Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy:the results of an initial series,and an evaluation of its role in the management of ureteric calculi.Br J Urol,1994,74:170-176.
  • 8Feyaerts A,Rietbergen J,Navarra S,et al.Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for ureteral calculi.Eur Urol,2001,40:609-613.
  • 9Skrepetis K,Doumas K,Siafakas I,et al.Laparoscopic versus open ureterolithotomy.A comparative study.Eur Urol,2001,40:32-37.
  • 10严共全,王行环,王穗青,许宏志,陈卫彬,黄海涛.后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术10例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2001,22(12):753-753. 被引量:4

共引文献406

同被引文献32

  • 1王耀东,辛宇鹏.腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术的疗效研究[J].四川医学,2012,33(11):1952-1954. 被引量:3
  • 2杨江根,方烈奎,尹朝晖,黄东龙,肖克峰.经腹与经腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(11):883-885. 被引量:23
  • 3Elashry OM , Elgamasy AK, Sabaa MA, et al. Ureteroscopic manage-ment of lower ureteric calculi : a 15 - year single - centre experience[J]. BJU Int, 2008,102(8) : 1010 -1017.
  • 4Clarke M , Horton R. Bringing it all together; Lancet - Cochrane col-laborate on systematic reviews[ J]. Lancet, 2001, 357(9270) : 1728.
  • 5Stroup DF, Berlin JA , Morton SC , et al. Meta - analysis of observa-tional studies in epidemiology : a proposal for reporting [ J ]. JAMA ,2000,283(15) : 2008 -2012.
  • 6Dersimonian R , Laird N. Meta - analysis in clinical trials [ J ] . Con-trol Clin Trials, 1986, 7(3) : 177-188.
  • 7Singh V , Sinha RJ, Gupta DK , et al. Transperitoneal versus retroper-itoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a prospective randomized com-parison study [J]. J Urol, 2013 , 189 (3 ) : 940 - 945.
  • 8Bove P , Micali S , Miano R , et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy : acomparison between the transperitoneal and the retroperitoneal ap-proach during the learning curve [ J ]. J Endourol, 2009,23 ( 6 ):953 -957.
  • 9Wisoot K, Sahachart K, Kittinut K,et al. Extraperitoneal versustransperitoneal approach of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in selectedpatients[J]. Med Assoc Thai, 2010,93(7) : 794 -798.
  • 10Raboy A, Ferzli GS , Ioffreda R, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy[J]. Urology, 1992, 39(3):223 -225.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部