2Dror. I. E, Champod. C, Langenburg. G. Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis:Inter- and Intra-expert consistency and the effect of a"arger'comparison[J]. Forensic Science Int, 2011 , (208) : 10-17.
3J. Vanderkolk. ACE+V : A model[J]. Journal of Forensic Iden- tification, 2004,54( 1 ) :45-52.
4Vanderkolk. John. R. Forensic Comparative Science:Qualitative Source Determination of Unique Impressions, Images and Objects[M]. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, 2009:90.
5Champod. C. fingerprints and other Ridge Skin Impression[M]. Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press, 2004:13.
6I. W. Evett,R. A. Williams. A review of the sixteen points fingerprint standard in England and Wales. Journal of Forensic Identification, 1996,46( 1 ) :49-73.
7SWEGFAST. Friction Ridge Examination Methodology for Latent Print Examiners[Z]. 2010.
8Robert Epstein. Fingerprints Meet Daubert:The Myth of Fingerprint "Science" Is Revealed[J]. North California Law Re- view, 2002, (3) :26-35.
9Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld,Jim Dwyer. Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make it Right[M]. New York : Doubleday Publishing, 2000 : 7-15.
10Kasey Wer theim. ACE-V: Is It Scientifically And Accurate[J]. Jounal of Forensic Identification, 2002, (52) :6-12.
